Interactive Visualization Applications in Population Health and Health Services Research: Systematic Scoping Review.
data visualization
health services research
interactive visualization
population health
public health informatics
secondary health care data
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 02 2022
18 02 2022
Historique:
received:
27
01
2021
accepted:
08
10
2021
revised:
27
04
2021
entrez:
18
2
2022
pubmed:
19
2
2022
medline:
31
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Simple visualizations in health research data, such as scatter plots, heat maps, and bar charts, typically present relationships between 2 variables. Interactive visualization methods allow for multiple related facets such as numerous risk factors to be studied simultaneously, leading to data insights through exploring trends and patterns from complex big health care data. The technique presents a powerful tool that can be used in combination with statistical analysis for knowledge discovery, hypothesis generation and testing, and decision support. The primary objective of this scoping review is to describe and summarize the evidence of interactive visualization applications, methods, and tools being used in population health and health services research (HSR) and their subdomains in the last 15 years, from January 1, 2005, to March 30, 2019. Our secondary objective is to describe the use cases, metrics, frameworks used, settings, target audience, goals, and co-design of applications. We adapted standard scoping review guidelines with a peer-reviewed search strategy: 2 independent researchers at each stage of screening and abstraction, with a third independent researcher to arbitrate conflicts and validate findings. A comprehensive abstraction platform was built to capture the data from diverse bodies of literature, primarily from the computer science and health care sectors. After screening 11,310 articles, we present findings from 56 applications from interrelated areas of population health and HSR, as well as their subdomains such as epidemiologic surveillance, health resource planning, access, and use and costs among diverse clinical and demographic populations. In this companion review to our earlier systematic synthesis of the literature on visual analytics applications, we present findings in 6 major themes of interactive visualization applications developed for 8 major problem categories. We found a wide application of interactive visualization methods, the major ones being epidemiologic surveillance for infectious disease, resource planning, health service monitoring and quality, and studying medication use patterns. The data sources included mostly secondary administrative and electronic medical record data. In addition, at least two-thirds of the applications involved participatory co-design approaches while introducing a distinct category, embedded research, within co-design initiatives. These applications were in response to an identified need for data-driven insights into knowledge generation and decision support. We further discuss the opportunities stemming from the use of interactive visualization methods in studying global health; inequities, including social determinants of health; and other related areas. We also allude to the challenges in the uptake of these methods. Visualization in health has strong historical roots, with an upward trend in the use of these methods in population health and HSR. Such applications are being fast used by academic and health care agencies for knowledge discovery, hypotheses generation, and decision support. RR2-10.2196/14019.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Simple visualizations in health research data, such as scatter plots, heat maps, and bar charts, typically present relationships between 2 variables. Interactive visualization methods allow for multiple related facets such as numerous risk factors to be studied simultaneously, leading to data insights through exploring trends and patterns from complex big health care data. The technique presents a powerful tool that can be used in combination with statistical analysis for knowledge discovery, hypothesis generation and testing, and decision support.
OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this scoping review is to describe and summarize the evidence of interactive visualization applications, methods, and tools being used in population health and health services research (HSR) and their subdomains in the last 15 years, from January 1, 2005, to March 30, 2019. Our secondary objective is to describe the use cases, metrics, frameworks used, settings, target audience, goals, and co-design of applications.
METHODS
We adapted standard scoping review guidelines with a peer-reviewed search strategy: 2 independent researchers at each stage of screening and abstraction, with a third independent researcher to arbitrate conflicts and validate findings. A comprehensive abstraction platform was built to capture the data from diverse bodies of literature, primarily from the computer science and health care sectors. After screening 11,310 articles, we present findings from 56 applications from interrelated areas of population health and HSR, as well as their subdomains such as epidemiologic surveillance, health resource planning, access, and use and costs among diverse clinical and demographic populations.
RESULTS
In this companion review to our earlier systematic synthesis of the literature on visual analytics applications, we present findings in 6 major themes of interactive visualization applications developed for 8 major problem categories. We found a wide application of interactive visualization methods, the major ones being epidemiologic surveillance for infectious disease, resource planning, health service monitoring and quality, and studying medication use patterns. The data sources included mostly secondary administrative and electronic medical record data. In addition, at least two-thirds of the applications involved participatory co-design approaches while introducing a distinct category, embedded research, within co-design initiatives. These applications were in response to an identified need for data-driven insights into knowledge generation and decision support. We further discuss the opportunities stemming from the use of interactive visualization methods in studying global health; inequities, including social determinants of health; and other related areas. We also allude to the challenges in the uptake of these methods.
CONCLUSIONS
Visualization in health has strong historical roots, with an upward trend in the use of these methods in population health and HSR. Such applications are being fast used by academic and health care agencies for knowledge discovery, hypotheses generation, and decision support.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
RR2-10.2196/14019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35179499
pii: v24i2e27534
doi: 10.2196/27534
pmc: PMC8900899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e27534Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
©Jawad Chishtie, Iwona Anna Bielska, Aldo Barrera, Jean-Sebastien Marchand, Muhammad Imran, Syed Farhan Ali Tirmizi, Luke A Turcotte, Sarah Munce, John Shepherd, Arrani Senthinathan, Monica Cepoiu-Martin, Michael Irvine, Jessica Babineau, Sally Abudiab, Marko Bjelica, Christopher Collins, B Catharine Craven, Sara Guilcher, Tara Jeji, Parisa Naraei, Susan Jaglal. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 18.02.2022.
Références
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;3(2):89-99
pubmed: 25083228
Public Health Rep. 2011 Sep-Oct;126 Suppl 3:115-26
pubmed: 21836744
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6
pubmed: 26134548
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014 Feb 07;2:3
pubmed: 25825667
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Nov;27(11):1307-1316
pubmed: 30312110
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 30;14(9):
pubmed: 28867782
Am J Public Health. 2017 Nov;107(11):1760-1763
pubmed: 28933938
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):330-9
pubmed: 25336597
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):314-323
pubmed: 30840080
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Feb;34(2):169-79
pubmed: 26660349
Bioinformatics. 2015 Mar 15;31(6):969-71
pubmed: 25380962
Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Oct;33(10):417-26
pubmed: 26468967
Online J Public Health Inform. 2017 Dec 30;9(3):e197
pubmed: 29403576
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 03;3(1):
pubmed: 23293241
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2012 Dec;18(12):2431-40
pubmed: 26357151
Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):139-61
pubmed: 17319809
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):7-9
pubmed: 11949927
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 05;15(6):
pubmed: 29874883
Reprod Health. 2016 Jul 22;13(1):88
pubmed: 27449128
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Sep 15;3(3):503-15
pubmed: 26374807
Online J Public Health Inform. 2014 Feb 05;5(3):223
pubmed: 24678376
Online J Public Health Inform. 2016 Dec 28;8(3):e195
pubmed: 28210416
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:1600-3
pubmed: 26736580
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Jul-Aug;9(4):320-30
pubmed: 12087113
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;32(1):81-84
pubmed: 28921707
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 08;16:951
pubmed: 27609056
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6
pubmed: 27005575
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 May 03;4(2):e42
pubmed: 29724710
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;13(1):ijerph13010018
pubmed: 26703677
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):312-7
pubmed: 25336592
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3
pubmed: 27366130
Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:2579848
pubmed: 28529537
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108
pubmed: 19490148
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):318-23
pubmed: 25656514
Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(1):e15-21
pubmed: 24669409
AIDS Educ Prev. 2018 Feb;30(1):26-34
pubmed: 29481299
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9:14-20
pubmed: 25123716
Environ Health Insights. 2011;5:71-85
pubmed: 22174586
Online J Public Health Inform. 2015 Dec 30;7(3):e225
pubmed: 26834938
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2019 Jan;31(1):8-16
pubmed: 30383550
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Inj Prev. 2016 Apr;22 Suppl 1:i27-33
pubmed: 26728006
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Dec;42(12):1977-1986
pubmed: 30470805
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 23;19(1):515
pubmed: 31337391
Online J Public Health Inform. 2013 Jul 01;5(2):212
pubmed: 23923097
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(8):1848-1852
pubmed: 29641277
Proc 2015 Workshop Vis Anal Healthc (2015). 2015 Oct;2015:
pubmed: 29177250
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 May 23;6(2):
pubmed: 29882866
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;56:46-52
pubmed: 30032027
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Aug 06;2(2):e16
pubmed: 25599727
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;1(2-3):143-50
pubmed: 22749470
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(sup1):1440783
pubmed: 29974823
Am J Public Health. 2003 Mar;93(3):380-3
pubmed: 12604476
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1731-5
pubmed: 20445186
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Oct 28;8(10):e14019
pubmed: 31661081
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:1-8
pubmed: 29887229
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 01;15(3):
pubmed: 29494555
J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1135-52
pubmed: 21541691
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e17892
pubmed: 33270029
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Feb 06;11:130300
pubmed: 24503340
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 15;6(2):e14683
pubmed: 21347221
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Oct;51:287-98
pubmed: 24747356
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):354-375
pubmed: 30736710