Anatomically and physiologically informed computational model of hepatic contrast perfusion for virtual imaging trials.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
revised: 02 02 2022
received: 16 06 2021
accepted: 02 02 2022
pubmed: 24 2 2022
medline: 12 5 2022
entrez: 23 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Virtual (in silico) imaging trials (VITs), involving computerized phantoms and models of the imaging process, provide a modern alternative to clinical imaging trials. VITs are faster, safer, and enable otherwise-impossible investigations. Current phantoms used in VITs are limited in their ability to model functional behavior such as contrast perfusion which is an important determinant of dose and image quality in CT imaging. In our prior work with the XCAT computational phantoms, we determined and modeled inter-organ (organ to organ) intravenous contrast concentration as a function of time from injection. However, intra-organ concentration, heterogeneous distribution within a given organ, was not pursued. We extend our methods in this work to model intra-organ concentration within the XCAT phantom with a specific focus on the liver. Intra-organ contrast perfusion depends on the organ's vessel network. We modeled the intricate vascular structures of the liver, informed by empirical and theoretical observations of anatomy and physiology. The developed vessel generation algorithm modeled a dual-input-single-output vascular network as a series of bifurcating surfaces to optimally deliver flow within the bounding surface of a given XCAT liver. Using this network, contrast perfusion was simulated within voxelized versions of the phantom by using knowledge of the blood velocities in each vascular structure, vessel diameters and length, and the time since the contrast entered the hepatic artery. The utility of the enhanced phantom was demonstrated through a simulation study with the phantom voxelized prior to CT simulation with the relevant liver vasculature prepared to represent blood and iodinated contrast media. The spatial extent of the blood-contrast mixture was compared to clinical data. The vascular structures of the liver were generated with size and orientation which resulted in minimal energy expenditure required to maintain blood flow. Intravenous contrast was simulated as having known concentration and known total volume in the liver as calibrated from time-concentration curves. Measurements of simulated CT ROIs were found to agree with clinically observed values of early arterial phase contrast enhancement of the parenchyma ( The computational methods presented here furthered the development of the XCAT phantoms allowing for multi-timepoint contrast perfusion simulations, enabling more anthropomorphic virtual clinical trials intended for optimization of current clinical imaging technologies and applications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35195901
doi: 10.1002/mp.15562
pmc: PMC9547339
mid: NIHMS1782996
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2938-2951

Subventions

Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB028744
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB001838
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01EB001838
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P41EB028744
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Radiology. 2017 Jun;283(3):749-757
pubmed: 28287916
Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Dec;28(10):714-9
pubmed: 21191735
J Ultrasound. 2007 Mar;10(1):5-11
pubmed: 23396216
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61
pubmed: 20574084
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):327-31
pubmed: 7839963
Med Phys. 2011 Jun;38(6):3165-76
pubmed: 21815391
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Mar;37(3):693-702
pubmed: 29533891
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Jul;25(6):915-21
pubmed: 10461719
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):379-89
pubmed: 24834487
World J Hepatol. 2016 Jun 8;8(16):665-72
pubmed: 27326313
Acta Radiol. 1997 May;38(3):416-21
pubmed: 9191433
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e185474
pubmed: 30646401
Mod Pathol. 2016 May;29(5):489-99
pubmed: 26916069
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Aug;151(2):300-2
pubmed: 3293374
J Anat. 2018 Mar;232(3):485-496
pubmed: 29205328
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1589-94
pubmed: 18941106
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):043701
pubmed: 23556927
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Dec;205(6):1167-72
pubmed: 26587921
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5064-78
pubmed: 19994517
Hepatogastroenterology. 1996 Jan-Feb;43(7):199-202
pubmed: 8682462
Radiographics. 2009 Oct;29(6):1615-35
pubmed: 19959511
Cleve Clin J Med. 2020 Oct 1;87(10):595-598
pubmed: 33004318
Ter Arkh. 2014;86(2):90-5
pubmed: 24772515
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2018 Jul-Sep;28(3):315-319
pubmed: 30319208
Acad Radiol. 2005 Dec;12(12):1542-50
pubmed: 16321743
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Jun;9(6):1037-1046
pubmed: 31367557
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct 28;11(40):6348-53
pubmed: 16419164
J Neuroradiol. 2015 Feb;42(1):21-9
pubmed: 25636991
Radiology. 1998 Jun;207(3):657-62
pubmed: 9609887
Acta Radiol. 1992 Nov;33(6):600-5
pubmed: 1449889
Radiology. 2017 Jun;283(3):739-748
pubmed: 28092496
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3375-85
pubmed: 22755718
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1996 Oct;24(5):293-9
pubmed: 8938512
Radiology. 1989 Mar;170(3 Pt 1):795-800
pubmed: 2916031
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Jan;58(1):25-35
pubmed: 20709637
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2006 Dec;15(4):343-6
pubmed: 17205145
J Pharm Sci. 1968 Jan;57(1):117-23
pubmed: 5652110
Jpn J Radiol. 2009 Apr;27(3):143-50
pubmed: 19412682
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):510-8
pubmed: 25714279
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2003 Mar;30(1):57-61
pubmed: 27285156
Radiology. 1998 Feb;206(2):455-64
pubmed: 9457200
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Jan;3(1):47-53
pubmed: 31559375
J Anat. 2014 Apr;224(4):509-17
pubmed: 24433401
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med. 2003;58(1):286-90
pubmed: 15315000
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):679-85
pubmed: 10954450
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Sep;35(9):e3229
pubmed: 31368204
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Aug;72(3):339-340
pubmed: 32936681
Jpn J Radiol. 2015 Apr;33(4):194-200
pubmed: 25673431
Radiology. 1998 Jun;207(3):647-55
pubmed: 9609886
Int J Artif Organs. 2004 Mar;27(3):222-30
pubmed: 15112888
Br J Radiol. 2019 Jan;92(1093):20180153
pubmed: 30182750
Am J Physiol. 1990 Feb;258(2 Pt 2):H460-5
pubmed: 2309911
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jun;38(6):1457-1465
pubmed: 30561344
Semin Liver Dis. 2007 Nov;27(4):390-400
pubmed: 17979075
Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2345-54
pubmed: 18491094

Auteurs

Thomas J Sauer (TJ)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.

Ehsan Abadi (E)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.

Paul Segars (P)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.

Ehsan Samei (E)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials (CVIT), Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, #302, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Cerebrospinal Fluid Animals Liver Glymphatic System Spinal Cord

Kupffer cell reverse migration into the liver sinusoids mitigates neonatal sepsis and meningitis.

Bruna Araujo David, Jawairia Atif, Fernanda Vargas E Silva Castanheira et al.
1.00
Animals Kupffer Cells Mice Liver Cell Movement

Classifications MeSH