Safety, feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of the Neurofenix platform for Rehabilitation via HOMe Based gaming exercise for the Upper-limb post Stroke (RHOMBUS): results of a feasibility intervention study.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 02 2022
Historique:
entrez: 1 3 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 23 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To investigate the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the Neurofenix platform for home-based rehabilitation of the upper limb (UL). A non-randomised intervention design with a parallel process evaluation. Participants' homes, South-East England. Thirty adults (≥18 years), minimum 12-week poststroke, not receiving UL rehabilitation, scoring 9-25 on the Motricity Index (elbow and shoulder), with sufficient cognitive and communicative abilities to participate. Participants were trained to use the platform, followed by 1 week of graded game-play exposure and 6-week training, aiming for a minimum 45 min, 5 days/week. Safety was determined by assessing pain and poststroke fatigue at 8 and 12 weeks, and adverse events (AEs). Impairment, activity and participation outcomes were measured. Intervention feasibility was determined by the amount of specialist training and support required to complete the intervention, time and days spent training, and number of UL movements performed. Acceptability was assessed by a satisfaction questionnaire and semistructured interviews. Participants (14 women; mean (SD) age 60.0 (11.3) years) were a median of 4.9 years poststroke (minimum-maximum: 1-28 years). Twenty-seven participants completed the intervention. The odds of having shoulder pain were lower at 8 weeks (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.83, p=0.010) and 12 weeks (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.86, p=0.014) compared with baseline. Fugl-Meyer upper extremity, Motor Activity Log and passive range of movement improved. No other gains were recorded. Poststroke fatigue did not change. Thirty mild and short-term AEs and one serious (unrelated) AE were reported by 19 participants. Participants trained with the platform for a median of 17.4 hours over 7 weeks (minimum-maximum: 0.3-46.9 hours), equating to a median of 149 min per week. The median satisfaction score was 36 out of 40. The Neurofenix platform is a safe, feasible and well accepted way to support UL training for people at least three months poststroke. ISRCTN60291412.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35228279
pii: bmjopen-2021-052555
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052555
pmc: PMC8886425
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e052555

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: GS-B and DAA are employed by Neurofenix (United Kingdom), a digital therapeutics company developing a therapy platform and sensor-based devices to augment rehabilitation. Neurofenix provided the Neurofenix platforms and technical support to the research therapists. Neurofenix had no influence on the design of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data or manuscript preparation. KB and DJMS were employed by Brunel University London during the period of the study, and are now Neurofenix employees.

Références

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Feb;24(2):113-24
pubmed: 19861591
Games Health J. 2020 Feb;9(1):1-10
pubmed: 32027185
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Mar;43(5):640-647
pubmed: 31311348
Phys Ther. 2015 Mar;95(3):350-9
pubmed: 25212521
Trials. 2015 May 05;16:205
pubmed: 25939584
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 21;8(11):e026620
pubmed: 30467137
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jan;82(1):14-9
pubmed: 11239280
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Feb;31(2):173-185
pubmed: 26975313
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8
pubmed: 22169081
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1692-8
pubmed: 19801058
Stroke. 2004 Jun;35(6):1410-4
pubmed: 15087552
Stroke. 2011 Aug;42(8):2276-9
pubmed: 21680905
J Physiother. 2010;56(1):7-17
pubmed: 20500132
Disabil Rehabil. 1999 Aug;21(8):357-64
pubmed: 10503976
Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1606-10
pubmed: 6622535
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Apr;16(3):332-339
pubmed: 31684776
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7
pubmed: 3809245
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Mar;123:11-22
pubmed: 30654899
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):78-90
pubmed: 17704352
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(3):240-50
pubmed: 23077144
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Jan;17(1):100-106
pubmed: 32421460
BMC Neurol. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):219
pubmed: 27835977
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:317-326
pubmed: 32430189
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):784-792
pubmed: 28934918
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Oct;48(10):1258-65
pubmed: 21414620
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
Clin Rehabil. 2000 Jun;14(3):288-99
pubmed: 10868724
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Mar;29(3):295-305
pubmed: 25125442
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jul 15;39(3):431-8
pubmed: 27589513
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):557
pubmed: 27716179
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Aug;22(6):781-3
pubmed: 22541607
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1234-43
pubmed: 25568073
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15
pubmed: 22867780
Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):791-8
pubmed: 22282773
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2016 May 09;3:2055668316643644
pubmed: 31186903
Lancet. 2002 Mar 2;359(9308):781-5
pubmed: 11888606
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Mar 11;4(1):
pubmed: 26732690
BMJ. 2012 Feb 27;344:e1119
pubmed: 22371859
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Apr;13(4):244-255
pubmed: 28303914
Int J Stroke. 2013 Jan;8(1):25-32
pubmed: 23280266
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 20;11:CD008349
pubmed: 29156493
J Rehabil Med. 2011 Feb;43(3):181-9
pubmed: 21305232
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):413-22
pubmed: 25391221
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Apr;75(4):394-8
pubmed: 8172497
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2053-8
pubmed: 24867924

Auteurs

Cherry Kilbride (C)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK Cherry.Kilbride@brunel.ac.uk.

Daniel J M Scott (DJM)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.
Neurofenix, London, UK.

Tom Butcher (T)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Meriel Norris (M)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Alyson Warland (A)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Nana Anokye (N)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Elizabeth Cassidy (E)

Freelance Academic and Research Supervisor, London, UK.

Karen Baker (K)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.
Neurofenix, London, UK.

Dimitrios A Athanasiou (DA)

Neurofenix, London, UK.

Guillem Singla-Buxarrais (G)

Neurofenix, London, UK.

Alexander Nowicky (A)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Jennifer Ryan (J)

Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.
Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH