A pathway of the generation of acid mine drainage and release of arsenic in the bioleaching of orpiment.


Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 19 08 2021
revised: 06 03 2022
accepted: 07 03 2022
pubmed: 15 3 2022
medline: 7 5 2022
entrez: 14 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Arsenic in acid mine drainage (AMD) is commonly associated with the bioleaching of arsenic sulfide minerals. Orpiment is iron free and one of the most common arsenic sulfide minerals, but no studies are involved with the relationship between the iron free bioleaching of orpiment and the generation of arsenic-containing AMD. In this study, the iron free bioleaching experiments with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (T.t) or Acidithiobacillus caldus (A.c) were carried out. In the experiments with T.t, the pH value decreased with time, and the leached arsenic increased significantly. Meanwhile, the density of planktonic bacteria increased gradually, suggesting that T.t survived in the orpiment pulp. However, in the experiments with initial pH of 1, pH changed little and arsenic was nearly not leached, implying that the bioleaching of orpiment can be inhibited when the initial pH was too low. The XRD patterns and the TFESEM-EDS analyses showed that no elemental sulfur was detected on the orpiment surface. It was supposed that the sulfur was converted to sulfuric acid in the bioleaching process. The CFESEM images showed that no corrosion pits were formed though a few cells adhered to the orpiment surface, and the TEM images showed that no extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) were excreted by the attached cells on the orpiment particles. In the experiments with A.c, similar results were obtained. It is inferred that the bioleaching of orpiment under iron deficient conditions in mining areas generates arsenic-containing AMD, but can be inhibited when the initial pH is too low.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35283152
pii: S0045-6535(22)00780-9
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134287
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Arsenicals 0
Minerals 0
Sulfides 0
arsenic trisulfide 44SIJ800OX
Sulfur 70FD1KFU70
Iron E1UOL152H7
Arsenic N712M78A8G

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

134287

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Cailong Shen (C)

State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

Guangji Zhang (G)

State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China. Electronic address: gjzhang@ipe.ac.cn.

Kexin Li (K)

School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.

Chao Yang (C)

State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Shantou, 515031, China. Electronic address: chaoyang@ipe.ac.cn.

Articles similaires

Oryza Soil Pollutants Risk Assessment Metals, Heavy Humans
Soil Pollutants Cadmium Arsenic Soil Microbiology Iron
Colorimetry Captopril Humans Alloys Limit of Detection

Classifications MeSH