Navigating the Regulatory Pathway for Medical Devices-a Conversation with the FDA, Clinicians, Researchers, and Industry Experts.

Medical device regulation Regulatory science Translational science

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular translational research
ISSN: 1937-5395
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Transl Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101468585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2022
Historique:
received: 19 12 2021
accepted: 04 03 2022
pubmed: 16 3 2022
medline: 3 11 2022
entrez: 15 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Successful translation of new and innovative medical products from concept to clinical use is a complex endeavor that requires understanding and overcoming a variety of challenges. In particular, regulatory pathways and processes are often unfamiliar to academic researchers and start-ups, and even larger companies. Growing evidence suggests that the successful translation of ideas to products requires collaboration and cooperation between clinicians, researchers, industry, and regulators. A multi-stakeholder group developed this review to enhance regulatory knowledge and thereby improve translational success for medical devices. Communication between and among stakeholders is identified as a critical factor. Current regulatory programs and processes to facilitate communication and translation of innovative devices are described and discussed. Case studies are used to highlight the importance of flexibility when considering evidence requirements. We provide a review of emerging strategies, opportunities, and best practices to increase the regulatory knowledge base and facilitate medical device translation by all stakeholders. Clinicians, regulators, industry, and researchers require regulatory knowledge and collaboration for successful translation of innovative medical devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35288821
doi: 10.1007/s12265-022-10232-1
pii: 10.1007/s12265-022-10232-1
pmc: PMC8920055
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

927-943

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002529
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Butler, D. (2008). Translational research: Crossing the valley of death. Nature, 453(7197), 840–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/453840a
doi: 10.1038/453840a pubmed: 18548043
Mankoff, S. P., Brander, C., Ferrone, S., & Marincola, F. M. (2004). Lost in translation: Obstacles to translational medicine. J Transl Med, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-2-14
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-2-14
Ren, Y., Fagette, P. H., Hall, C. L., Broers, H., Grainger, D. W., Ven Der Mei, H. C., & Busscher, H. J. (2019). Clinical translation of the assets of biomedical engineering - A retrospective analysis with looks to the future. Expert Rev Med Devices, 16(11), 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1685869
doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1685869 pubmed: 31657961
Brightman, A. O., Coffee, R. L., Garcia, K., Lottes, A. E., Sors, T. G., Moe, S. M., & Wodicka, G. R. (2021). Advancing medical technology innovation and clinical translation via a model of industry-enabled technical and educational support: Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute’s Medical Technology Advance Program. J Clin Transl Sci, 5(1), e79.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.1 pubmed: 34007464 pmcid: 8111604
Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) Virtual Retreat. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://engineering.purdue.edu/BME/AboutUs/News/allevents/indiana-clinical-and-translational-science-ctsi-virtual-retreat
United States Food and Drug Administration. (February 2, 2021). CDRH Patient Engagement. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/cdrh-patient-science-and-engagement-program/cdrh-patient-engagement
Johnston, J. L., Dhruva, S. S., Ross, J. S., & Rathi, V. K. (2020). Early experience with the FDA’s Breakthrough Devices program. Nat Biotechnol, 38(8), 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0636-7
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0636-7 pubmed: 32704171
United States Food and Drug Administration. (March 15, 2021). Safer Technologies Program (SteP) for medical devices. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/how-study-and-market-your-device/safer-technologies-program-step-medical-devices
United States Food and Drug Administration. (January 6, 2021). Requests for feedback and meetings for medical device submissions: The Q-Submission Program - guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/114034/download
United States Food and Drug Administration. (September 23, 2020). Payor Communication Task Force. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/cdrh-innovation/payor-communication-task-force
United States Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Examples of real-world evidence (RWE) used in medical device regulatory decisions. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/146258/download
Bernad, D. M. (2009). Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption regulatory programs: Pros and cons. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 6(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.6.2.137
doi: 10.1586/17434440.6.2.137 pubmed: 19298161
United States Food and Drug Administration. (January 2018). 2018–2020 strategic priorities, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/files/about%20fda/published/2018-2020-Strategic-Priorities.pdf
United States Food and Drug Administration. (November 16, 2021). Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP). Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/cdrh-international-programs/medical-device-single-audit-program-mdsap
Richmond, F. J., & Church, T. D. (2020). Graduate training capacity for regulatory professionals at US universities: Are we facing a talent crisis? Ther Innov Regul Sci, 54(4), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00111-9
doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00111-9 pubmed: 31925701
United States Food and Drug Administration. (October 1, 2013). Investigational Device Exemptions (IDEs) for early feasibility medical device clinical studies, including certain first in human (FIH) studies - Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/81784/download
Holmes, D. R., Farb, A. A., Hance, R. C., Leon, M. B., Goldberg, P., Zuckerman, B. D., Kaplan, A. V., Rincon-Gonzalez, L., Hunt, J., Walkowiak, J., & Mack, M. J. (2020). Early feasibility studies for cardiovascular devices in the United States: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol, 76(23), 2786–2794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.019
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.019 pubmed: 33272373
Takahashi, S., Ibrahim, N., Yasukochi, S., et al. (2020). Partnership between Japan and the United States for early development of pediatric medical devices - Harmonization By Doing for children. Circ J, 84(5), 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1092
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1092 pubmed: 32238666
Drury C. (January 12, 2021). Indiana CTSI launches preclinical innovation pathway “Think Tank” to help principal investigators advance their novel ideas to the market. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://indianactsi.org/news_/indiana-ctsi-launches-preclinical-innovation-pathway-think-tank-to-help-principal-investigators-advance-their-novel-ideas-to-the-market/
United States Food and Drug Administration. (September 16, 2019). Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) program - Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/74307/download
United States Food and Drug Administration. (October 4, 2021). De Novo Classification Request. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions/de-novo-classification-request
United States Food and Drug Administration, (June 21, 2016). Leveraging existing clinical data for extrapolation to pediatric uses of medical devices - Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/91889/download
United States Food and Drug Administration. (June 6, 2017). PMA P160035: EXCOR® Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf16/P160035B.pdf
United States Food and Drug Administration. (January 27, 2015). PMA P140017 Melody™ transcatheter pulmonary valve FDA summary of safety and effectiveness data. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf14/p140017b.pdf
Fischer, G. A., Wells, S. M., Rebuffoni, J. F., Peterson, B. M., & LeBien, T. W. (2019). A model for overcoming challenges in academic pediatric medical device innovation. J Clin Transl Sci, 3(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.370
doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.370 pubmed: 31404158 pmcid: 6676500
Ulrich, L. C., Joseph, F. D., Lewis, D. Y., & Koenig, R. L. (2013). FDA’s pediatric device consortia: National program fosters pediatric medical device development. Pediatrics, 131(5), 981–985. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1534
doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1534 pubmed: 23569100
United States Food and Drug Administration. (September 27, 2019). Medical device data systems, medical image storage devices, and medical image communications devices - Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/88572/download
United States Food and Drug Administration. (January 2021). Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based software as a medical device (SaMD) Action Plan. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/145022/download
United States Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, and Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. (October 2021). Good machine learning practice for medical device development: Guiding principles. Retrieved February 14, 2022, from https://www.fda.gov/media/153486/download
United States Food and Drug Administration. (January 15, 2020). K192004 - Eko Analysis Software. Retrieved November 17, 2021, from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf19/K192004.pdf
Yao, X., Rushlow, D. R., Inselman, J. W., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms for identification of patients with low ejection fraction: A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial. Nat Med, 27(5), 815–819.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01335-4 pubmed: 33958795

Auteurs

Aaron E Lottes (AE)

Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, USA. lottes@purdue.edu.

Kenneth J Cavanaugh (KJ)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Yvonne Yu-Feng Chan (YY)

Agile Science Consulting, New York, NY, USA.

Vincent J Devlin (VJ)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Craig J Goergen (CJ)

Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Ronald Jean (R)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Jacqueline C Linnes (JC)

Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Misti Malone (M)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Raquel Peat (R)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

David G Reuter (DG)

Seattle Children's Hospital, Allegro Pediatrics, Seattle, WA, USA.

Kay Taylor (K)

Becton Dickinson & Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

George R Wodicka (GR)

Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Articles similaires

Climate Change Social Media Humans Communication Canada

You won't believe this.

Kai Kupferschmidt
1.00
Humans Communication COVID-19

Public attitudes towards social media field experiments.

Vincent J Straub, Jason W Burton, Michael Geers et al.
1.00
Social Media Humans Public Opinion Attitude Ethics, Research

Classifications MeSH