Ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service in Victoria: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.
continuity of patient care
home care services
hospital-based
midwifery
perinatal mortality
Journal
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
ISSN: 1479-828X
Titre abrégé: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 0001027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
01
12
2021
accepted:
05
03
2022
pubmed:
24
3
2022
medline:
19
10
2022
entrez:
23
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rates of homebirth in Australia remain low, at less than 0.3% of all births. To report maternal and neonatal outcomes of ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service, 2009-2019. Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome data including neonatal outcomes of women who requested a homebirth at a large metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia. The primary outcomes included: maternal outcomes (mortality, transfer to hospital, place and mode of birth, perineal status, type of third stage of labour, postpartum haemorrhage), and neonatal outcomes (mortality, Apgar score at five minutes, birthweight, breastfeeding initiation, significant morbidity, transfer to hospital). Referrals for 827 women were reviewed; 633 remained eligible at 36 weeks gestation, and 473 (57%) birthed at home. Compared to women who did not, women who had a homebirth were significantly more likely to be multiparous, have a normal vaginal birth and an intact perineum, less likely to require suturing and less likely to have blood loss of more than 500 mL. Compared to infants not born at home, infants born at home were significantly less likely to require resuscitation, more likely to be of normal birthweight and exclusively receive breastmilk on discharge. There were no maternal deaths and one neonatal death of a baby born at home before the arrival of a midwife. The outcomes for women accepted into the publicly funded homebirth program suggest appropriate triaging and case selection. A publicly funded homebirth program, with appropriate governance and clinical guidelines, appears to be a safe option for women experiencing low-risk pregnancies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rates of homebirth in Australia remain low, at less than 0.3% of all births.
AIMS
To report maternal and neonatal outcomes of ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service, 2009-2019.
METHOD
Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome data including neonatal outcomes of women who requested a homebirth at a large metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia. The primary outcomes included: maternal outcomes (mortality, transfer to hospital, place and mode of birth, perineal status, type of third stage of labour, postpartum haemorrhage), and neonatal outcomes (mortality, Apgar score at five minutes, birthweight, breastfeeding initiation, significant morbidity, transfer to hospital).
RESULTS
Referrals for 827 women were reviewed; 633 remained eligible at 36 weeks gestation, and 473 (57%) birthed at home. Compared to women who did not, women who had a homebirth were significantly more likely to be multiparous, have a normal vaginal birth and an intact perineum, less likely to require suturing and less likely to have blood loss of more than 500 mL. Compared to infants not born at home, infants born at home were significantly less likely to require resuscitation, more likely to be of normal birthweight and exclusively receive breastmilk on discharge. There were no maternal deaths and one neonatal death of a baby born at home before the arrival of a midwife.
CONCLUSIONS
The outcomes for women accepted into the publicly funded homebirth program suggest appropriate triaging and case selection. A publicly funded homebirth program, with appropriate governance and clinical guidelines, appears to be a safe option for women experiencing low-risk pregnancies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35318640
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13518
pmc: PMC9790430
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
664-673Subventions
Organisme : Mavis Mitchell Scholarship at Western Health
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Références
Med J Aust. 2013 Jun 17;198(11):616-20
pubmed: 23919710
Midwifery. 2021 Jul;98:102977
pubmed: 33751929
Women Birth. 2016 Jun;29(3):223-33
pubmed: 26631349
Women Birth. 2022 Feb;35(1):23-30
pubmed: 33541812
Women Birth. 2012 Dec;25(4):152-8
pubmed: 22104264
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):228-234
pubmed: 29787638
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):221-230
pubmed: 30104172
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 29;9(10):e029192
pubmed: 31662359
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49(6):631-6
pubmed: 20070712
Med J Aust. 2013 Dec 16;199(11):742-3
pubmed: 24329630
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 29;14:179
pubmed: 24886482
Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 18;192(2):76-80
pubmed: 20078406
Midwifery. 2016 Apr;35:24-30
pubmed: 27060397
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):357
pubmed: 30176816
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):99
pubmed: 28351344
Women Birth. 2022 Jul;35(4):413-422
pubmed: 34518118
Midwifery. 2016 May;36:61-9
pubmed: 27106945
Med J Aust. 2013 Dec 16;199(11):743
pubmed: 24329631
Midwifery. 2014 Jul;30(7):892-8
pubmed: 24690129
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400
pubmed: 22117057
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4:CD004667
pubmed: 27121907
Med J Aust. 2013 Dec 16;199(11):742
pubmed: 24329629
Med J Aust. 2013 Jun 17;198(11):574-5
pubmed: 23919687
Aust Health Rev. 2012 May;36(2):140-7
pubmed: 22624633