Exploration of the dynamic interplay between lipids and membrane proteins by hydrostatic pressure.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2022
Historique:
received: 22 03 2021
accepted: 14 03 2022
entrez: 2 4 2022
pubmed: 3 4 2022
medline: 6 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cell membranes represent a complex and variable medium in time and space of lipids and proteins. Their physico-chemical properties are determined by lipid components which can in turn influence the biological function of membranes. Here, we used hydrostatic pressure to study the close dynamic relationships between lipids and membrane proteins. Experiments on the β-barrel OmpX and the α-helical BLT2 G Protein-Coupled Receptor in nanodiscs of different lipid compositions reveal conformational landscapes intimately linked to pressure and lipids. Pressure can modify the conformational landscape of the membrane protein per se, but also increases the gelation of lipids, both being monitored simultaneously at high atomic resolution by NMR. Our study also clearly shows that a membrane protein can modulate, at least locally, the fluidity of the bilayer. The strategy proposed herein opens new perspectives to scrutinize the dynamic interplay between membrane proteins and their surrounding lipids.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35365643
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29410-5
pii: 10.1038/s41467-022-29410-5
pmc: PMC8975810
doi:

Substances chimiques

Lipid Bilayers 0
Membrane Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1780

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Engelman, D. M. Membranes are more mosaic than fluid. Nature 438, 578–580 (2005).
pubmed: 16319876 doi: 10.1038/nature04394
Andersen, O. S. & Koeppe, R. E. Bilayer thickness and membrane protein function: an energetic perspective. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 107–130 (2007).
pubmed: 17263662 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132643
Mondal, S., Khelashvili, K. & Weinstein, H. Not just an oil slick: how the energetics of protein-membrane interactions impacts the function and organization of transmembrane proteins. Biophys. J. 106, 2305–2316 (2014).
pubmed: 24896109 pmcid: 4052241 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.032
Cooper, R. A. Abnormalities of cell-membrane fluidity in the pathogenesis of disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 297, 371–377 (1977).
pubmed: 327326 doi: 10.1056/NEJM197708182970707
Lenaz, G. “Membrane Fluidity and Its Alterations in Disease”. In Biomembranes: Basic and Medical Research. (eds. G. Benga, J. M. Tager) pp 13–49 (Springer, 1988).
Desay, A. J. & Miller, L. J. Changes in the plasma membrane in metabolic disease: impact of the membrane environment on G protein-coupled receptor structure and function. Br. J. Pharmacol. 175, 4009–4025 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/bph.13943
Sinensky, M. Homeoviscous adaptation - a homeostatic process that regulates the viscosity of membrane lipids in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 522–525 (1974).
pubmed: 4360948 pmcid: 388039 doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.2.522
Budin, I. et al. Viscous control of cellular respiration by membrane lipid composition. Science 362, 1186–1189 (2018).
pubmed: 30361388 doi: 10.1126/science.aat7925
Bartlett, D. H. Pressure effects on in vivo microbial processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1595, 367–381 (2002).
pubmed: 11983409 doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(01)00357-0
Kung, C. A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation. Nature 436, 647–654 (2005).
pubmed: 16079835 doi: 10.1038/nature03896
de Meyer, F. & Smit, B. Effect of cholesterol on the structure of a phospholipid bilayer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3654–3658 (2009).
pubmed: 19225105 pmcid: 2656135 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809959106
van Meer, G., Voelker, D. R. & Feigenson, G. W. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 112–124 (2008).
pubmed: 18216768 pmcid: 2642958 doi: 10.1038/nrm2330
Stoorvogel, J., vanBussel, M. J. & vandeKlundert, J. A. Biological characterization of an Enterobacter cloacae outer membrane protein (OmpX). J. Bacteriol. 173, 161–167 (1991).
pubmed: 1702778 pmcid: 207170 doi: 10.1128/jb.173.1.161-167.1991
Yokomizo, T., Kato, K., Terawaki, K., Izumi, T. & Shimizu, T. A second leukotriene B(4) receptor, BLT2. A new therapeutic target in inflammation and immunological disorders. J. Exp. Med. 192, 421–432 (2000).
pubmed: 10934230 pmcid: 2193217 doi: 10.1084/jem.192.3.421
Denisov, I. G. & Silgar, S. G. Nanodiscs in membrane biochemistry and biophysics. Chem. Rev. 117, 4669–4713 (2017).
pubmed: 28177242 pmcid: 5805400 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00690
Günsel, U., Hagn, F. Lipid nanodiscs for high-resolution NMR studies of membrane proteins. Chem. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00702 (2021).
Jonas, J. & Jonas, A. High-pressure NMR spectroscopy of proteins and membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23, 287–318 (1994).
pubmed: 7919784 doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001443
Akasaka, K. Probing conformational fluctuation of proteins by pressure perturbation. Chem. Rev. 106, 1814–1835 (2006).
pubmed: 16683756 doi: 10.1021/cr040440z
Kitahara, R. High-pressure NMR spectroscopy reveals functional sub-states of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Subcell. Biochem. 72, 199–214 (2015).
pubmed: 26174383 doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9918-8_10
Roche, J., Royer, C. A. & Roumestand, C. Exploring protein conformational landscapes using high-pressure NMR. Methods Enzymol. 614, 293–320 (2019).
pubmed: 30611428 doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.07.006
Winter, R. & Jeworrek, C. Effect of pressure on membranes. Soft Matter 5, 3157–3173 (2009).
doi: 10.1039/b901690b
Brooks, N. J. Pressure effects on lipids and bio-membrane assemblies. IUCrJ 1, 470–477 (2014).
pubmed: 25485127 pmcid: 4224465 doi: 10.1107/S2052252514019551
Dalmasso, C. et al. Thermococcus piezophilus sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic and piezophilic archaeon with a broad pressure range for growth, isolated from a deepest hydrothermal vent at the Mid-Cayman Rrise. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 39, 440–444 (2016).
pubmed: 27638197 doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2016.08.003
Hagn, F., Etzkorn, M., Raschle, T. & Wagner, G. Optimized phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs facilitate high-resolution structure determination of membrane proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1919–1925 (2013).
pubmed: 23294159 pmcid: 3566289 doi: 10.1021/ja310901f
Hanson, M. A. et al. A specific cholesterol binding site is established by the 2.8 angstrom structure of the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Structure 16, 897–905 (2008).
pubmed: 18547522 pmcid: 2601552 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.05.001
Winter, R. Pressure effects on artificial and cellular membranes. Subcell. Biochem. 72, 345–370 (2015).
pubmed: 26174390 doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9918-8_17
Fuentes, E. J. & Wand, A. J. Local stability and dynamics of apocytochrome b562 examined by the dependence of hydrogen exchange on hydrostatic pressure. Biochemistry 37, 9877–9883 (1998).
pubmed: 9665691 doi: 10.1021/bi980894o
Quinlan, R. J. & Reinhart, G. D. Baroresistant buffer mixtures for biochemical analyses. Anal. Biochem. 341, 69–76 (2005).
pubmed: 15866529 doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.03.002
Czeslik, C., Reis, O., Winter, R. & Rapp, G. Effect of high pressure on the structure of dipalmitoyphosphatidylcholine bilayer membranes: a synchrotron-X-ray diffraction and FT-IR spectroscopy study using the diamond anvil technique. Chem. Phys. Lipids 91, 135–144 (1998).
doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(97)00104-7
Winter, R. & Pilgrim, W.-C. A SANS study of high pressure phase transitions in model biomembranes. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 93, 708–717 (1989).
doi: 10.1002/bbpc.19890930611
Marsh, D. Lateral pressure in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1286, 183–223 (1996).
pubmed: 8982283 doi: 10.1016/S0304-4157(96)00009-3
Vogt, J. & Schulz, G. E. The structure of the outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli reveals possible mechanisms of virulence. Structure 7, 1301–1309 (1999).
pubmed: 10545325 doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)80063-5
Hagn, F. & Wagner, G. The structure of the outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli reveals possible mechanisms of virulence. J. Biomol. NMR 61, 249–260 (2015).
pubmed: 25430058 doi: 10.1007/s10858-014-9883-6
Kitahara, R., Hata, K., Li, H., M. P., W. & Akasaka, K. Pressure-induced chemical shifts as probes for conformational fluctuations in proteins. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 71, 35–58 (2013).
pubmed: 23611314 doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2012.12.001
Refaee, M., Tezuka, T., Akasaka, K. & M. P., W. Pressure-dependent changes in the solution structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 327, 857–865 (2003).
pubmed: 12654268 doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00209-2
Kitahara, R. et al. A delicate interplay of structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics for function: a high pressure NMR study of outer surface protein A. J. Mol. Biol. 102, 916–926 (2012).
Frey, L., Hiller, S., Riek, R. & Bibow, S. Lipid- and cholesterol-mediated time-scale-specific modulation of the outer membrane protein X dynamics in lipid bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 15402–15411 (2018).
pubmed: 30289706 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09188
Bockaert, J. & J. P., P. Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success. EMBO J. 18, 1723–1729 (1999).
pubmed: 10202136 pmcid: 1171258 doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.7.1723
Latorraca, N. R., Venkatakrishnan, A. J. & Dror, R. O. GPCR dynamics: structures in motion. Chem. Rev. 117, 139–155 (2017).
pubmed: 27622975 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00177
Casiraghi, M. et al. NMR analysis of GPCR conformational landscapes and dynamics. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 484, 69–77 (2019).
pubmed: 30690069 doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.12.019
Wootten, D., Christopoulos, A., Marti-Solano, M., M. M., B. & P. M., S. Mechanisms of signalling and biased agonism in G protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 638–653 (2018).
pubmed: 30104700 doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0049-3
Lane, J. R., May, L. T., Parton, R. G., Sexton, P. M. & Christopoulos, A. A kinetic view of GPCR allostery and biased agonism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 929–937 (2017).
pubmed: 28820879 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2431
Dawaliby, R. et al. Allosteric regulation of G protein-coupled receptor activity by phospholipids. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 35–39 (2016).
pubmed: 26571351 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1960
Strittmatter, W. J., Hirata, F. & Axelrod, J. Phospholipid methylation unmasks cryptic beta-adrenergic receptors in rat reticulocytes. Science 204, 1205–1207 (1979).
pubmed: 221977 doi: 10.1126/science.221977
Gimpl, G., Burger, K. & Fahrenholz, F. Cholesterol as modulator of receptor function. Biochemistry 36, 10959–10974 (1997).
pubmed: 9283088 doi: 10.1021/bi963138w
Villar, V. A., Cuevas, S., Zheng, X. & Jose, P. A. Localization and signaling of GPCRs in lipid rafts. Methods Cell. Biol. 132, 3–23 (2016).
pubmed: 26928536 doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2015.11.008
Amero, C. et al. Fast two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy of high molecular weight protein assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3448–3449 (2009).
pubmed: 19243101 doi: 10.1021/ja809880p
Ballesteros, J. A. & Weinstein, H. Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci. 25, 366–428 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/S1043-9471(05)80049-7
Kooistra, A. J. et al. GPCRdb in 2021: integrating GPCR sequence, structure and function. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D335–D343 (2021).
pubmed: 33270898 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1080
Casiraghi, M., Damian, M., Lescop, E., J.-L., Banères & Catoire, L. J. Illuminating the energy landscape of GPCRs: the key contribution of solution-state NMR associated with Escherichia coli as an expression host. Biochemistry 57, 2297–2307 (2018).
pubmed: 29607648 doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00035
Casiraghi, M. et al. Functional modulation of a G protein-coupled receptor conformational landscape in a lipid bilayer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11170–11175 (2016).
pubmed: 27489943 doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04432
Frauenfelder, H. et al. Proteins and pressure. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1024–1037 (1990).
doi: 10.1021/j100366a002
Akasaka, K. & Li, H. Low-lying excited states of proteins revealed from nonlinear pressure shifts in
pubmed: 11467925 doi: 10.1021/bi010312u
Chen, C. R. & Makhatadze, G. I. Molecular determinant of the effects of hydrostatic pressure on protein folding stability. Nat. Commun. 8, 14561 (2017).
pubmed: 28169271 pmcid: 5309723 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14561
Abiko, L. A., Grahl, A. & Grzesiek, S. High pressure shifts the β1-adrenergic receptor to the active conformation in the absence of G protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 16663–16670 (2019).
pubmed: 31564099 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06042
Lerch, M. T. et al. Viewing rare conformations of the β2 adrenergic receptor with pressure-resolved DEER spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31824–31831 (2020).
pubmed: 33257561 pmcid: 7749303 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013904117
Balayssac, S., M.-A., D., Gilard, V., Prigent, Y. & Malet-Martino, M. Two-dimensional DOSY experiment with Excitation Sculpting water suppression for the analysis of natural and biological media. J. Magn. Res. 196, 78–83 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.09.022
Damian, M. et al. Allosteric modulation of ghrelin receptor signaling by lipids. Nat. Commun. 12, 3938 (2021).
pubmed: 34168117 pmcid: 8225672 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23756-y
Ritchie, T. K. et al. Chapter 11 - Reconstitution of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs. Methods Enzymol. 464, 211–231 (2009).
pubmed: 19903557 pmcid: 4196316 doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)64011-8
Huber, T., Botelho, A. V., Beyer, K. & Brown, M. F. Membrane model for the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: hydrophobic interface and dynamical structure. Biophys. J. 86, 2078–2100 (2004).
pubmed: 15041649 pmcid: 1304060 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74268-X
Arcemisbéhère, L. et al. Leukotriene BLT2 receptor monomers activate the G(i2) GTP-binding protein more efficiently than dimers. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 6337–6347 (2010).
pubmed: 20026606 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.083477
Tetko, I. V. & Poda, G. I. Application of ALOGPS 2.1 to predict log D distribution coefficient for Pfizer proprietary compounds. J. Med. Chem. 47, 5601–5604 (2004).
pubmed: 15509156 doi: 10.1021/jm049509l
Schanda, P. & Brutscher, B. Very fast two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy for real-time investigation of dynamic events in proteins on the time scale of seconds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 8014–8015 (2005).
pubmed: 15926816 doi: 10.1021/ja051306e
Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696 (2005).
pubmed: 15815974 doi: 10.1002/prot.20449
Caro, J. A. & Wand, A. J. Practical aspects of high-pressure NMR spectroscopy and its applications in protein biophysics and structural biology. Methods 148, 67–80 (2018).
pubmed: 29964175 pmcid: 6133745 doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.06.012
Watts, A. NMR of Lipids. In Encyclopedia of Biophysics. (eds. G. C. K. Roberts) (Springer, 2013).

Auteurs

Alexandre Pozza (A)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France.

François Giraud (F)

Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles (ICSN), CNRS UPR 2301, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Quentin Cece (Q)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France.
Laboratoire Cibles Thérapeutiques et Conception de Médicaments (CiTCoM), UMR 8038, CNRS/Université de Paris, Faculté de Pharmacie, 75270, Paris, Cedex 06, France.

Marina Casiraghi (M)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France.
Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA.

Elodie Point (E)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France.

Marjorie Damian (M)

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Pôle Chimie Balard Recherche, 34293, Montpellier, cedex 5, France.

Christel Le Bon (C)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France.

Karine Moncoq (K)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France.

Jean-Louis Banères (JL)

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Pôle Chimie Balard Recherche, 34293, Montpellier, cedex 5, France.

Ewen Lescop (E)

Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles (ICSN), CNRS UPR 2301, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. ewen.lescop@cnrs.fr.

Laurent J Catoire (LJ)

Laboratoire de Biologie Physico-Chimique des Protéines Membranaires, UMR 7099, CNRS/Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique (IBPC, FRC 550), 75005, Paris, France. laurent.catoire@ibpc.fr.

Articles similaires

Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
Humans Animals Adherens Junctions Intercellular Junctions Tight Junctions
1.00
Plasmodesmata Endoplasmic Reticulum Arabidopsis Cytokinesis Arabidopsis Proteins
Humans Stomach Neoplasms Macrophages Tumor Microenvironment Disease Progression

Classifications MeSH