In silico approach to probe the binding affinity between OMVs harboring the Z

Affibody Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Molecular dynamic RMSD RoG

Journal

Journal of molecular modeling
ISSN: 0948-5023
Titre abrégé: J Mol Model
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9806569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 26 09 2021
accepted: 25 01 2022
entrez: 6 4 2022
pubmed: 7 4 2022
medline: 8 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is a growing interest in designing a nanocarrier containing an EGFR targeting affibody to direct toward cancer cells. Here, cytolysin A was cloned at the N-terminus of Z

Identifiants

pubmed: 35381900
doi: 10.1007/s00894-022-05043-9
pii: 10.1007/s00894-022-05043-9
doi:

Substances chimiques

Peptides 0
ErbB Receptors EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

113

Subventions

Organisme : Pasteur Institute of Iran

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F, Normanno N (1995) Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 19(3):183–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-I
doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-I pubmed: 7612182
Normanno N, Bianco C, De Luca A, Salomon DS (2001) The role of EGF related peptides in tumor growth. Front Biosci 6:D685-707. https://doi.org/10.2741/normano
doi: 10.2741/normano pubmed: 11333208
Huang W, Wang S, Yao Y, Xia Y, Yang X, Li K et al (2016) Employing Escherichia coli-derived outer membrane vesicles as an antigen delivery platform elicits protective immunity against Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Sci Rep 6:37242. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37242
doi: 10.1038/srep37242 pubmed: 27849050 pmcid: 5110958
Nokleby H, Aavitsland P, O’Hallahan J, Feiring B, Tilman S, Oster P (2007) Safety review: two outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines against systemic Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B disease. Vaccine 25(16):3080–3084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.022
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.022 pubmed: 17287053
Pathirana RD, Kaparakis-Liaskos M (2016) Bacterial membrane vesicles: biogenesis, immune regulation and pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol 18(11):1518–1524. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12658
doi: 10.1111/cmi.12658 pubmed: 27564529
Ellis TN, Leiman SA, Kuehn MJ (2010) Naturally produced outer membrane vesicles from Pseudomonas aeruginosa elicit a potent innate immune response via combined sensing of both lipopolysaccharide and protein components. Infect Immun 78(9):3822–3831. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00433-10
doi: 10.1128/IAI.00433-10 pubmed: 20605984 pmcid: 2937433
Vanaja SK, Russo AJ, Behl B, Banerjee I, Yankova M, Deshmukh SD, Rathinam VA (2016) Bacterial outer membrane vesicles mediate cytosolic localization of LPS and caspase-11 activation. Cell 165(5):1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.015
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.015 pubmed: 27156449 pmcid: 4874922
Olofsson A, Nygård Skalman L, Obi I et al (2014) Uptake of Helicobacter pylori vesicles is facilitated by clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent endocytic pathways. MBio 5(3):e00979-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00979-14
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00979-14 pubmed: 24846379 pmcid: 4030451
Furuta N, Tsuda K, Omori H, Yoshimori T, Yoshimura F, Amano A (2009) Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles enter human epithelial cells via an endocytic pathway and are sorted to lysosomal compartments. Infect Immun 77(10):4187–4196. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00009-09
doi: 10.1128/IAI.00009-09 pubmed: 19651865 pmcid: 2747946
Parker H, Chitcholtan K, Hampton MB, Keenan JI (2010) Uptake of Helicobacter pylori outer membrane vesicles by gastric epithelial cells. Infect Immun 78(12):5054–5061. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00299-10
doi: 10.1128/IAI.00299-10 pubmed: 20876296 pmcid: 2981328
Farasat A, Rahbarizadeh F, Hosseinzadeh G, Sajjadi S, Kamali M (2016) Affinity enhancement of nanobody binding to EGFR: in silico site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulation approaches. J Biomol Struct Dyn 35(8):1710–1728. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2016.1192065
doi: 10.1080/07391102.2016.1192065 pubmed: 27691399
Friedman M, Nordberg E, Höidén-Guthenberg I, Brismar H, Adams GP, Nilsson FY, Carlsson J, Ståhl S (2007) Phage display selection of affibody molecules with specific binding to the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Protein Eng Des Sel 20(4):189–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzm011
doi: 10.1093/protein/gzm011 pubmed: 17452435
Tolmachev V, Friedman M, Sandström M, Eriksson TLJ, Rosik D, Hodik M, Ståhl S, Frejd FY, Orlova A (2009) Affibody molecules for epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in vivo: aspects of dimerization and labeling chemistry. J Nucl Med 50(2):274–283. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.055525
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055525 pubmed: 19164241
Nordberg E, Friedman M, Göstringa L, Adams GP, Brismare H, Nilssona FY, Ståhlb S, Glimeliusf B, Carlssona J (2007) Cellular studies of binding, internalization and retention of a radiolabeled EGFR-binding affibody molecule. Nucl Med Biol 34(6):609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.05.010
doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.05.010 pubmed: 17707800
Goormaghtigh E, De Meutter J, Szoka F, Cabiaux V, Parente RA, Ruysschaert JM (1991) Secondary structure and orientation of the amphipathic peptide GALA in lipid structures. An infrared-spectroscopic approach. Eur J Biochem 195(2):421–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb15721.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb15721.x pubmed: 1997324
Sepahdar Z, Miroliaei M, Bouzari S, Khalaj V, Salimi M (2021) Surface engineering of Escherichia coli-derived OMVs as promising nano-carriers to target EGFR-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Front Pharmacol 16:719289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.719289
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.719289
Kakudo T, Chaki S, Futaki S, Nakase I, Akaji K, Kawakami T et al (2004) Transferrin-modified liposomes equipped with a pH-Sensitive fusogenic peptide: an artificial viral-like delivery system. Biochem 43(19):5618–5628. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi035802w
doi: 10.1021/bi035802w
Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y (2010) I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5(4):725–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.5
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.5 pubmed: 20360767 pmcid: 2849174
Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 26:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892009944
doi: 10.1107/S0021889892009944
Colovos C, Yeates TO (1993) Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 2(9):1511–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020916
doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020916 pubmed: 8401235 pmcid: 2142462
Kozakov D, Hall DR, Xia B et al (2017) The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking. Nat Protoc 12(2):255–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.169
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.169 pubmed: 28079879 pmcid: 5540229
 DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL molecular graphics system on world wide web. http://www.pymol.org
Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51(10):2778–2786. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200227u
doi: 10.1021/ci200227u pubmed: 21919503
Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2010) Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 78(8):1950–1958. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22711
doi: 10.1002/prot.22711 pubmed: 20408171 pmcid: 2970904
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Inf Model 79:926. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869
doi: 10.1063/1.445869
Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, Lindahl E (2015) GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
Fuglebakk E, Echave J, Reuter N (2012) Measuring and comparing structural fluctuation patterns in large protein datasets. Bioinform 28(19):2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts445
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts445
Nimrod G, Fischman S, Austin M, Herman A, Keyes F, Leiderman O, Hargreaves D et al (2018) Computational design of epitope-specific functional antibodies. Cell Repor 25(8):2121–2131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.081
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.081
Huang PS, Love JJ, Mayo SL (2007) A de novo designed protein- protein interface. Protein Sci 16(12):2770–2774. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.073125207
doi: 10.1110/ps.073125207 pubmed: 18029425 pmcid: 2222823
Zhu C, Zhang C, Zhang T, Zhang X, Shen Q, Tang B, Liang H, Lai L (2016) Rational design of TNFα binding proteins based on the de novo designed protein DS119. Protein Sci 25(11):2066–2075. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3029
doi: 10.1002/pro.3029 pubmed: 27571536 pmcid: 5079244
Peled S, Leiderman O, Charar R, Efroni G, Shav-Tal Y, Ofran Y (2016) De-novo protein function prediction using DNA binding and RNA binding proteins as a test case. Nat Commun 7:13424. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13424
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13424 pubmed: 27869118 pmcid: 5121330
Sela-Culang I, Benhnia MR, Matho MH, Kaever T, Maybeno M, Schlossman A, Nimrod G, Li S, Xiang Y, Zajonc D, Crotty S, Ofran Y, Peters B (2014) Using a combined computational-experimental approach to predict antibody-specific B cell epitopes. Structure 22(4):646–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2014.02.003
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.02.003 pubmed: 24631463
Seshacharyulu P, Ponnusamy MP, Haridas D, Jain M, Ganti AK, Batra SK (2012) Targeting the EGFR signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets 16(1):15–3. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.2011.648617
doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.648617 pubmed: 22239438 pmcid: 3291787
Bitto NJ, Kaparakis-Liaskos M (2017) The therapeutic benefit of bacterial membrane vesicles. Int J Mol Sci 18(6):1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061287
doi: 10.3390/ijms18061287 pmcid: 5486109
Rathnayake S, Weerasinghe S (2018) Exploring the binding properties of agonists interacting with glucocorticoid receptor: an in silico approach. J Mol Model 24(12):342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3879-1
doi: 10.1007/s00894-018-3879-1 pubmed: 30460461

Auteurs

Zahra Sepahdar (Z)

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology & Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Reza Saghiri (R)

Biochemistry Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

Mehran Miroliaei (M)

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology & Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. m.miroliaei@sci.ui.ac.ir.

Mona Salimi (M)

Physiology and Pharmacology Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. salimimona@pasteur.ac.ir.

Articles similaires

Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
Animals Huntington Disease Mitochondria Neurons Mice
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 Ligands Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protein Binding Thermodynamics

Classifications MeSH