PedBotHome: A Video Game-Based Robotic Ankle Device Created for Home Exercise in Children With Neurological Impairments.
Journal
Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association
ISSN: 1538-005X
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Phys Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8912748
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2022
01 04 2022
Historique:
entrez:
6
4
2022
pubmed:
7
4
2022
medline:
9
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This pilot study assesses the feasibility of using PedBotHome to promote adherence to a home exercise program, the ability of the device to withstand frequent use, and changes in participant ankle mobility.PedBotHome is a robotic ankle device with integrated video game software designed to improve ankle mobility in children with cerebral palsy. Eight participants enrolled in a 28-day trial of PedBotHome. Ankle strength, range of motion, and plantar flexor spasticity were measured pre- and posttrial. Performance was monitored remotely, and game settings were modified weekly by physical therapists. Four participants met the study goal of 20 days of use. There were statistically significant improvements in ankle strength, spasticity, and range of motion. PedBotHome is a feasible device to engage children with static neurological injuries in ankle home exercise. This pilot study expands the paradigm for future innovative home-based robotic rehabilitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35385456
doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000881
pii: 00001577-202204000-00018
pmc: PMC9009250
mid: NIHMS1772606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
212-219Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001876
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Patel DR, Neelakantan M, Pandher K, Merrick J. Cerebral palsy in children: a clinical overview. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9(suppl 1):S125–S135. doi:10.21037/tp.2020.01.01.
Damiano DL, Martellotta TL, Quinlivan JM, Abel MF. Deficits in eccentric versus concentric torque in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(1):117–122. doi:10.1097/00005768-200101000-00018.
Wiley ME, Damiano DL. Lower-extremity strength profiles in spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40(2):100–107. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb15369.x.
Moreau NG, Bodkin AW, Bjornson K, Hobbs A, Soileau M, Lahasky K. Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions to improve gait speed in children with cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(12):1938–1954. doi:10.2522/ptj.20150401.
Ross SA, Engsberg JR. Relationships between spasticity, strength, gait, and the GMFM-66 in persons with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1114–1120. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.011.
O'Neil ME, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Westcott SL, et al. Physical therapy clinical management recommendations for children with cerebral palsy-spastic diplegia: achieving functional mobility outcomes. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18(1):49–72. doi:10.1097/01.pep.0000202099.01653.a9.
Verschuren O, Darrah J, Novak I, Ketelaar M, Wiart L. Health-enhancing physical activity in children with cerebral palsy: more of the same is not enough. Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):297–305. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130214.
Novak I. Parent experience of implementing effective home programs. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31(2):198–213. doi:10.3109/01942638.2010.533746.
Peplow UC, Carpenter C. Perceptions of parents of children with cerebral palsy about the relevance of, and adherence to, exercise programs: a qualitative study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(3):285–299. doi:10.3109/01942638.2013.773954.
Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, McBurney H, Graham HK. Factors influencing adherence to a home-based strength-training programme for young people with cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy. 2004;90(2):57–63. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2003.09.001.
Lillo-Navarro C, Medina-Mirapeix F, Escolar-Reina P, Montilla-Herrador J, Gomez-Arnaldos F, Oliveira-Sousa SL. Parents of children with physical disabilities perceive that characteristics of home exercise programs and physical therapists' teaching styles influence adherence: a qualitative study. J Physiother. 2015;61(2):81–86. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.014.
Monfaredi R, Fooladi H, Roshani P, et al. PedBot: robotically assisted ankle robot and video game for children with neuromuscular disorders. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. Vol 10576. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2018:105761R. doi:10.1117/12.2295031.
Page ZE, Barrington S, Edwards J, Barnett LM. Do active video games benefit the motor skill development of non-typically developing children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(12):1087–1100. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.001.
Zhang M, Davies TC, Xie S. Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation—a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:30. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-30.
Burdea GC, Cioi D, Kale A, Janes WE, Ross SA, Engsberg JR. Robotics and gaming to improve ankle strength, motor control, and function in children with cerebral palsy—a case study series. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21(2):165–173. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206055.
Forrester LW, Roy A, Krywonis A, Kehs G, Krebs HI, Macko RF. Modular ankle robotics training in early sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(7):678–687. doi:10.1177/1545968314521004.
Michmizos KP, Igo Krebs H. Pediatric robotic rehabilitation: current knowledge and future trends in treating children with sensorimotor impairments. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(1):69–76. doi:10.3233/NRE-171458.
Sukal-Moulton T, Clancy T, Zhang L-Q, Gaebler-Spira D. Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application: does it translate to practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(8):1433–1440. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010.
Wu Y-N, Hwang M, Ren Y, Gaebler-Spira D, Zhang L-Q. Combined passive stretching and active movement rehabilitation of lower-limb impairments in children with cerebral palsy using a portable robot. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(4):378–385. doi:10.1177/1545968310388666.
Miao Q, Zhang M, Wang C, Li H. Towards optimal platform-based robot design for ankle rehabilitation: the state of the art and future prospects. J Healthc Eng. 2018;2018:1534247. doi:10.1155/2018/1534247.
Alvarez-Perez MG, Garcia-Murillo MA, Cervantes-Sánchez JJ. Robot-assisted ankle rehabilitation: a review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):394–408. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1578424.
Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
Cusick B. Lecture presented at: Optimizing Movement Training and Minimizing Deformities Using Orthotics Modifications and Theratogs Orthotic Systems; 2012; Rock Hill, NC.
Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion: review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(12):1867–1872. doi:10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867.
Byl N. Neuroplasticity: applications to motor control. In: Connolly BH, Montgomery PC, eds. Clinical Applications for Motor Control. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 2003:79–106.
Gracies J-M, Burke K, Clegg NJ, et al. Reliability of the Tardieu Scale for assessing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):421–428. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.017.
Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, Reddihough DS, Story I. Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(10):664–670. doi:10.1017/s0012162203001245.
Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW. Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther. 1996;76(3):248–259. doi:10.1093/ptj/76.3.248.
Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Graham HK. Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometric strength testing in young people with cerebral. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(1):77–80. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00379-4.
Schladen MM, Cleary K, Koumpouros Y, et al. Toward evaluation of the subjective experience of a general class of user-controlled, robot-mediated rehabilitation technologies for children with neuromotor disability. Informatics. 2020;7(4):45. doi:10.3390/informatics7040045.
Radomski MV, Latham CAT. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
Parsons TD, Rizzo AA, Rogers S, York P. Virtual reality in paediatric rehabilitation: a review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(4):224–238. doi:10.1080/17518420902991719.
Kim D-H, An D-H, Yoo W-G. Validity and reliability of ankle dorsiflexion measures in children with cerebral palsy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):465–468. doi:10.3233/BMR-170862.
Byranton J, Bosse J, McLean J, Brien M. Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conventional home exercise in children with cerebral palsy. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9(2):123–128.
Cleary K, Monfaredi R, Salvador T, et al. PedBotHome: robotically-assisted ankle rehabilitation system for children with cerebral palsy. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019;2019:13–20. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779468.