Ultra-high dose rate dosimetry: Challenges and opportunities for FLASH radiation therapy.

FLASH dosimetry proton therapy radiotherapy ultra-high dose rate

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Historique:
revised: 03 02 2022
received: 22 10 2021
accepted: 20 02 2022
pubmed: 12 4 2022
medline: 20 7 2022
entrez: 11 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy (RT) requires challenges related to dosimetry and beam monitoring of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) beams to be addressed. Detectors currently in use suffer from saturation effects under UHDR regimes, requiring the introduction of correction factors. There is significant interest from the scientific community to identify the most reliable solutions and suitable experimental approaches for UHDR dosimetry. This interest is manifested through the increasing number of national and international projects recently proposed concerning UHDR dosimetry. Attaining the desired solutions and approaches requires further optimization of already established technologies as well as the investigation of novel radiation detection and dosimetry methods. New knowledge will also emerge to fill the gap in terms of validated protocols, assessing new dosimetric procedures and standardized methods. In this paper, we discuss the main challenges coming from the peculiar beam parameters characterizing UHDR beams for FLASH RT. These challenges vary considerably depending on the accelerator type and technique used to produce the relevant UHDR radiation environment. We also introduce some general considerations on how the different time structure in the production of the radiation beams, as well as the dose and dose-rate per pulse, can affect the detector response. Finally, we discuss the requirements that must characterize any proposed dosimeters for use in UDHR radiation environments. A detailed status of the current technology is provided, with the aim of discussing the detector features and their performance characteristics and/or limitations in UHDR regimes. We report on further developments for established detectors and novel approaches currently under investigation with a view to predict future directions in terms of dosimetry approaches, practical procedures, and protocols. Due to several on-going detector and dosimetry developments associated with UHDR radiation environment for FLASH RT it is not possible to provide a simple list of recommendations for the most suitable detectors for FLASH RT dosimetry. However, this article does provide the reader with a detailed description of the most up-to-date dosimetric approaches, and describes the behavior of the detectors operated under UHDR irradiation conditions and offers expert discussion on the current challenges which we believe are important and still need to be addressed in the clinical translation of FLASH RT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35404484
doi: 10.1002/mp.15649
pmc: PMC9544810
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4912-4932

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Phys Med. 2016 Dec;32(12):1795-1800
pubmed: 27890569
Med Phys. 2013 Feb;40(2):020701
pubmed: 23387722
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Mar 21;56(6):1529-43
pubmed: 21325708
Med Phys. 2017 Mar;44(3):1157-1167
pubmed: 28094853
Opt Lett. 2017 Feb 15;42(4):847-850
pubmed: 28198880
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 3;10(1):9089
pubmed: 32493952
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jul 21;61(14):N349-61
pubmed: 27366861
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):4246-4256
pubmed: 31297824
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Dec 7;57(23):7767-81
pubmed: 23128412
Med Phys. 2017 Feb;44(2):725-735
pubmed: 28019660
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):973-982
pubmed: 30536832
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Apr 15;66(8):
pubmed: 33571973
Radiat Res. 2020 Dec 1;194(6):573-579
pubmed: 33348370
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 Jan 1;26(Pt 1):28-35
pubmed: 30655465
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:11-17
pubmed: 31253466
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Oct 07;65(20):205002
pubmed: 32619997
Med Phys. 2021 Feb;48(2):819-830
pubmed: 33251606
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jul 16;6(245):245ra93
pubmed: 25031268
Radiat Res. 1979 Jul;79(1):34-54
pubmed: 472125
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1992 Nov 1;46(18):11463-11470
pubmed: 10003033
Med Phys. 2019 Oct;46(10):4287-4290
pubmed: 31246281
Med Phys. 2007 Dec;34(12):4594-604
pubmed: 18196786
Med Phys. 2009 May;36(5):1690-9
pubmed: 19544786
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Dec;129(3):582-588
pubmed: 30177374
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Sep;20(9):095001
pubmed: 26334972
Med Phys. 2022 Jul;49(7):4912-4932
pubmed: 35404484
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 1;102(3):619-626
pubmed: 30017793
J Biomed Opt. 2018 Jan;23(1):1-7
pubmed: 29341541
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Jun 08;66(12):
pubmed: 33906166
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1094-102
pubmed: 15895594
Med Phys. 2018 Feb;45(2):863-874
pubmed: 29206287
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 12;92(19):8783-7
pubmed: 7568017
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70
pubmed: 10505874
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1854-63
pubmed: 22482607
Med Phys. 2020 Dec;47(12):6551-6561
pubmed: 33089504
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Mar 15;112(4):1012-1022
pubmed: 34813912
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:34-39
pubmed: 31174897
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jan 21;58(2):261-73
pubmed: 23257200
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Mar 7;57(5):1413-32
pubmed: 22349609
Med Phys. 2005 Jul;32(7):2204-10
pubmed: 16121574
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2022 Mar;6(3):252-262
pubmed: 36092270
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):e1051-e1072
pubmed: 30421809
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 05;16:26-32
pubmed: 33458340
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jan 1;97(1):195-203
pubmed: 27816362
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Nov 15;111(4):1011-1022
pubmed: 34343608
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jul 1;110(3):872-882
pubmed: 33444695
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Jul;31(7):407-415
pubmed: 31010708
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 28;116(22):10943-10951
pubmed: 31097580
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):414-428
pubmed: 29131344
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Mar 02;65(5):05TR02
pubmed: 31627202
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Sep 1;105(1):190-192
pubmed: 31145965
Med Phys. 2021 Apr;48(4):1839-1845
pubmed: 33480028
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:18-22
pubmed: 31303340
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1082):20170628
pubmed: 29172684
Radiat Res. 2020 Dec 1;194(6):580-586
pubmed: 33348371
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):3-5
pubmed: 30093447
Med Phys. 2021 Jul;48(7):3982-3990
pubmed: 33948958
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2015 Jul;22(4):1035-41
pubmed: 26134808
Radiat Res. 2020 Dec 1;194(6):656-664
pubmed: 32991708
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 21;62(12):4946-4969
pubmed: 28402289
Med Phys. 2020 Dec;47(12):6396-6404
pubmed: 32910460
Med Phys. 2021 Aug;48(8):4472-4484
pubmed: 34077590
Med Phys. 2021 Jul;48(7):3948-3957
pubmed: 33843065
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Sep;124(3):365-369
pubmed: 28545957
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:40-45
pubmed: 30755324
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):402-413
pubmed: 29164632
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2008 Apr 01;113(2):79-95
pubmed: 27096113
J Res Natl Bur Stand (1977). 1981 Sep-Oct;86(5):495-502
pubmed: 34566056
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Aug 21;49(16):3737-49
pubmed: 15446802
Phys Med. 2020 Dec;80:134-150
pubmed: 33181444
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:62-63
pubmed: 31431380
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4543-4552
pubmed: 32502280
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4348-4355
pubmed: 32452558
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):35-42
pubmed: 29875213
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;100(1-4):301-4
pubmed: 12382883
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Dec 04;65(23):23TR03
pubmed: 32721941
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):3191-3203
pubmed: 32297332
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 Dec 03;7(1):
pubmed: 34037536
Med Phys. 2012 May;39(5):2447-55
pubmed: 22559615
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 1;10(1):8833
pubmed: 32483249
Med Phys. 2021 Jul;48(7):4017-4026
pubmed: 33963576
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Feb 1;106(2):440-448
pubmed: 31928642
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 29;9(1):5307
pubmed: 30926839
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jul 05;64(13):135016
pubmed: 31276449
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:23-27
pubmed: 31010709
Biochemistry. 1990 Dec 11;29(49):10978-89
pubmed: 2125498
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:46-50
pubmed: 31266652
Phys Med Biol. 1964 Jul;9:273-86
pubmed: 14200061
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:4-10
pubmed: 31253467
Med Phys. 2016 Nov;43(11):5973
pubmed: 27806617
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;13(8):
pubmed: 33924627

Auteurs

Francesco Romano (F)

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy.

Claude Bailat (C)

Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Patrik Gonçalves Jorge (PG)

Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Radio-Oncology Laboratory, DO/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Michael Lloyd Franz Lerch (MLF)

Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Arash Darafsheh (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Female Precision Medicine Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Breast Neoplasms
Humans Pancreatic Neoplasms Proton Therapy Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Humans Proton Therapy Lung Neoplasms Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Classifications MeSH