Medical students' self-evaluation of character, and method of character education.
Character
Medical students
Professional practice gaps
Professionalism
Self-assessment
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Apr 2022
13 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
21
03
2022
entrez:
13
4
2022
pubmed:
14
4
2022
medline:
15
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As medical doctors must have a strong sense of ethics, character education is particularly important for them compared with other professions. This follow-up study aimed to establish the foundation for developing a character education program in medical schools by (1) conducting a survey among medical students on the self-assessment of one's character based on eight qualities (service and sacrifice, empathy and communication, care and respect, honesty and humility, responsibility and calling, collaboration and magnanimity, creativity and positivity, patience and leadership), the perceived importance of character, and satisfaction with character education at medical school, and (2) analyzing the usefulness of learning methods for acquiring character elements. It also aimed at verifying the (3) gender differences in self-evaluation of character elements, and (4) academic-year differences in the survey items. Medical students' perceptions were identified through a questionnaire survey among 856 medical students from five South Korean medical schools. The questionnaire comprised items on the achievement level of the character element, importance of character in the medical curriculum, satisfaction with character education in medical schools, and the learning method's degree of helpfulness. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were used to compare responses. The importance of eight-character qualities had high average scores, whereas the average scores for satisfaction with character education and achievement level were comparatively low. For the question on each learning method's helpfulness in gaining the eight-character qualities, the score of team-based learning activities was the highest, followed by club activities, relationships with peers, role modeling of professors, and course study. Regarding satisfaction with character education, male students gave higher scores than female students, manifesting a statistically significant difference. Regarding the importance of the character element in medical education, statistically significant differences existed based on academic year. Medical students' perceptions of character education varied according to gender and academic year. They regarded character education highly but were unsatisfied with the current character education at medical schools. Thus, diverse character education curricula must be developed and implemented along with extra-curricular character programs. An effective approach to implementing character education can be discovered by verifying the differences in students' perceptions based on the character education courses in medical schools.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As medical doctors must have a strong sense of ethics, character education is particularly important for them compared with other professions. This follow-up study aimed to establish the foundation for developing a character education program in medical schools by (1) conducting a survey among medical students on the self-assessment of one's character based on eight qualities (service and sacrifice, empathy and communication, care and respect, honesty and humility, responsibility and calling, collaboration and magnanimity, creativity and positivity, patience and leadership), the perceived importance of character, and satisfaction with character education at medical school, and (2) analyzing the usefulness of learning methods for acquiring character elements. It also aimed at verifying the (3) gender differences in self-evaluation of character elements, and (4) academic-year differences in the survey items.
METHODS
METHODS
Medical students' perceptions were identified through a questionnaire survey among 856 medical students from five South Korean medical schools. The questionnaire comprised items on the achievement level of the character element, importance of character in the medical curriculum, satisfaction with character education in medical schools, and the learning method's degree of helpfulness. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were used to compare responses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The importance of eight-character qualities had high average scores, whereas the average scores for satisfaction with character education and achievement level were comparatively low. For the question on each learning method's helpfulness in gaining the eight-character qualities, the score of team-based learning activities was the highest, followed by club activities, relationships with peers, role modeling of professors, and course study. Regarding satisfaction with character education, male students gave higher scores than female students, manifesting a statistically significant difference. Regarding the importance of the character element in medical education, statistically significant differences existed based on academic year.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Medical students' perceptions of character education varied according to gender and academic year. They regarded character education highly but were unsatisfied with the current character education at medical schools. Thus, diverse character education curricula must be developed and implemented along with extra-curricular character programs. An effective approach to implementing character education can be discovered by verifying the differences in students' perceptions based on the character education courses in medical schools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35414077
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03342-6
pii: 10.1186/s12909-022-03342-6
pmc: PMC9006595
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
271Subventions
Organisme : The Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea
ID : NRF-2018S1A5A2A01038037
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Acad Med. 2004 Jul;79(7):682-9
pubmed: 15234922
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:26
pubmed: 34583502
Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Sep;25(3):211-20
pubmed: 25804850
BMJ. 1997 May 24;314(7093):1540-2
pubmed: 9183205
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):265-7
pubmed: 27168902
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:22
pubmed: 31430841
Acad Med. 2002 May;77(5):432-7
pubmed: 12010705
Med Teach. 2014 Jan;36(1):47-61
pubmed: 24252073
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;27(3):543-548
pubmed: 32323428
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:43
pubmed: 33342190
Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):761-7
pubmed: 25853688
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Aug 12;11:16
pubmed: 25112444
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:21
pubmed: 31430840
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1996 Oct;51(4):484-500
pubmed: 9019066
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):514-21
pubmed: 10635508
Health Educ Behav. 2006 Jun;33(3):290-304
pubmed: 16699121
Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Jul;20(4):e81-4
pubmed: 19524164