Birth environments for women with complex pregnancies: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Delivery rooms Environment design High-risk pregnancy Midwifery Obstetric labour Systematic review

Journal

Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives
ISSN: 1878-1799
Titre abrégé: Women Birth
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101266131

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 15 12 2021
revised: 04 04 2022
accepted: 08 04 2022
pubmed: 19 4 2022
medline: 25 1 2023
entrez: 18 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Birth environments can help support women through labour and birth. Home-like rooms which encourage active birthing are embraced in midwifery-led settings. However, this is often not reflected in obstetric settings for women with more complex pregnancies. To investigate the impact of the birth environment for women with complex pregnancies. This was a mixed-methods systematic review, incorporating qualitative and quantitative research. A literature search was implemented across three databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase) from the year 2000 to June 2021. Studies were eligible if they were based in an Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development country and reported on birth environments for women with complex pregnancies. Papers were screened and quality appraised by two researchers independently. 30,345 records were returned, with 15 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were based in Australia, the UK, and the USA. Participants included women and health professionals. Five main themes arose: Quality of care and experience; Supportive spaces for women; Supportive spaces for midwives; Control of the space; Design issues. Women and midwives found the birth environment important in supporting, or failing to support, a positive birth experience. Obstetric environments are complex spaces requiring balance between space for women to mobilise and access birthing aids, with the need for medical teams to have easy access to the woman and equipment in emergencies. Further research is needed investigating different users' needs from the environment and how safety features can be balanced with comfort to provide high-quality care and positive experiences for women.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Birth environments can help support women through labour and birth. Home-like rooms which encourage active birthing are embraced in midwifery-led settings. However, this is often not reflected in obstetric settings for women with more complex pregnancies.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To investigate the impact of the birth environment for women with complex pregnancies.
METHODS METHODS
This was a mixed-methods systematic review, incorporating qualitative and quantitative research. A literature search was implemented across three databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase) from the year 2000 to June 2021. Studies were eligible if they were based in an Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development country and reported on birth environments for women with complex pregnancies. Papers were screened and quality appraised by two researchers independently.
FINDINGS RESULTS
30,345 records were returned, with 15 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were based in Australia, the UK, and the USA. Participants included women and health professionals. Five main themes arose: Quality of care and experience; Supportive spaces for women; Supportive spaces for midwives; Control of the space; Design issues.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Women and midwives found the birth environment important in supporting, or failing to support, a positive birth experience. Obstetric environments are complex spaces requiring balance between space for women to mobilise and access birthing aids, with the need for medical teams to have easy access to the woman and equipment in emergencies.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Further research is needed investigating different users' needs from the environment and how safety features can be balanced with comfort to provide high-quality care and positive experiences for women.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35431173
pii: S1871-5192(22)00073-7
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.04.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

39-46

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest None.

Auteurs

Gina Sands (G)

School of Health Sciences, B Floor, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Electronic address: gina.sands@nottingham.ac.uk.

Kerry Evans (K)

School of Health Sciences, B Floor, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Helen Spiby (H)

School of Health Sciences, B Floor, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Jeanette Eldridge (J)

School of Health Sciences, B Floor, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Phoebe Pallotti (P)

School of Health Sciences, B Floor, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Catrin Evans (C)

School of Health Sciences, B Floor, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH