Maternal beta-blocker dose and risk of small-for gestational-age in women with heart disease.

beta-blocker birthweight heart disease modified World Health Organization risk score pregnancy small-for-gestational-age z score

Journal

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
revised: 30 03 2022
received: 02 11 2021
accepted: 31 03 2022
pubmed: 26 4 2022
medline: 11 6 2022
entrez: 25 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Beta-blockers are prescribed for many pregnant women with heart disease, but whether there is a dose-dependent effect on fetal growth remains to be examined. We aimed to investigate if antenatal beta-blocker use and dose were associated with delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant among women with heart disease. Our cohort included women with heart disease who delivered at Oslo University Hospital between 2006 and 2015. Maternal heart disease was classified into modified WHO risk scores. Women with beta-blocker treatment were dichotomized into whether they had been treated with a low or high dose based on clinical factors. We compared the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant in women exposed to high doses, low doses, or with no exposure to antenatal beta-blockers while adjusting for severity of maternal heart disease in logistic regression models. Of a total of 540 pregnancies among women with heart disease, 163 (30.2%) were exposed to beta-blocker treatment. The majority were treated with metoprolol (86.5%). Almost twice as many babies in the beta-blocker group were small-for-gestational-age, compared with the non-exposed group (19.8 vs 9.5%, P < 0.001). Women using a high-dose beta-blocker had a five-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant compared with non-exposure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.22-10.78, P < 0.001). Women using a low dose of beta-blocker had a two-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant; however, the confidence interval included the null (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 0.83-3.72, P = 0.143). Results when restricting the analyses to metoprolol showed the same pattern, but with attenuation of risks. We found a five-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant in women with heart disease treated with a high dose of beta-blocker, and a two-fold increased risk among those treated with a low dose, showing an apparent dose-response relation. Close monitoring of fetal growth is warranted among women with heart disease treated with beta-blockers. As drug therapy in pregnancy concerns both mother and fetus, an optimum balance for both should be the goal.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35467752
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14363
pmc: PMC9564806
doi:

Substances chimiques

Metoprolol GEB06NHM23

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

794-802

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).

Références

BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 19;2(4):
pubmed: 22815467
BJOG. 2010 Mar;117(4):399-406
pubmed: 19943828
BMJ. 2018 Mar 9;360:k478
pubmed: 29523513
Heart. 2014 Sep;100(17):1373-81
pubmed: 25034822
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD002863
pubmed: 12917933
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000 Jun;79(6):440-9
pubmed: 10857867
Pharmacol Res. 2019 Aug;146:104274
pubmed: 31100336
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):794-802
pubmed: 35467752
Circulation. 2013 Dec 3;128(23):2478-87
pubmed: 24192800
Circulation. 2001 Jul 31;104(5):515-21
pubmed: 11479246
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 7;39(34):3165-3241
pubmed: 30165544
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):885-887
pubmed: 28418448
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):886-891
pubmed: 21422861
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Feb;36(1):145-53
pubmed: 24162929
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1273-1279
pubmed: 33524162
Heart. 2006 Oct;92(10):1520-5
pubmed: 16973809
Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13(25):2567-79
pubmed: 17897001
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):40-7
pubmed: 26113232
Circ J. 2016 Sep 23;80(10):2221-6
pubmed: 27593227
Congenit Heart Dis. 2019 Sep;14(5):735-744
pubmed: 31207185
BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):618-26
pubmed: 24400736
Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(9):657-65
pubmed: 22968232
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):893-9
pubmed: 11693767
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2S):S895-S906
pubmed: 32971013
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Dec;12(12):718-29
pubmed: 26585398

Auteurs

Ingvil Krarup Sørbye (IK)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Randi Haualand (R)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Henriette Wiull (H)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Anne-Sofie Letting (AS)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Eldrid Langesaeter (E)

Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Mette-Elise Estensen (ME)

Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH