A survey of the effects of common illicit drugs on forensic DNA analysis.
DNA
Drug profiling
Illicit drugs
Inhibition
PCR
Trace DNA
Journal
Forensic science international
ISSN: 1872-6283
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Int
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7902034
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2022
revised:
10
04
2022
accepted:
19
04
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
15
6
2022
entrez:
3
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Profiling of DNA associated with illicit drug packages and paraphernalia is a common investigative tool. In addition, research is being conducted regarding the analysis of trace DNA present within illicit drugs and on capsules. The application of trace DNA analysis to illicit drugs has the potential to identify individuals involved in their manufacture and distribution. However, the inhibitory effects of illicit drugs and related compounds on downstream DNA analysis has not yet been investigated. If drug-induced polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibition occurs, the quality or informativeness of the resultant DNA profile may be impacted. In this study, the effects of a range of drugs, diluents, adulterants, and synthetic precursors on both quantitative PCR (qPCR) data and short tandem repeat (STR) DNA profiling results were examined. Twenty-two compounds representative of drug compounds and adulterants which may be encountered in drug seizures were spiked with 1 ng/μL and 0.05 ng/μL of control DNA and underwent DNA quantification using Quantifiler™ Trio. A subset of 13 compounds, including the majority that indicated potential inhibition in Quantifiler™ Trio, underwent STR profiling with VeriFiler™ Plus to determine if inhibition also occurred at this stage. The effect of diluting the DNA extract on the extent of inhibition of STR profiling was also investigated. Internal PCR controls within the qPCR were not a reliable indicator of inhibition, although suppression of the short and long autosomal fragments was observed in the presence of many compounds, and four compounds gave inconclusive results. STR internal quality controls indicated inhibition in 5 of the 13 compounds, however, profiles were affected by the presence of 11 of the 13 compounds in various ways such as a decreased average relative fluorescence units (RFU), drop out of certain alleles (some based on allele size range of locus) leading to a decreased likelihood ratio (LR), an increase in the proportion of stutter peaks and the presence of split or shoulder peaks. All profiles improved following a dilution of the compound in the PCR and allowing the generation of LR values in excess of 1 × 10
Identifiants
pubmed: 35504097
pii: S0379-0738(22)00144-X
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111314
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Illicit Drugs
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111314Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.