Variation of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Techniques: a Survey of 518 Bariatric Surgeons.


Journal

Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
received: 23 12 2021
accepted: 26 04 2022
revised: 25 04 2022
pubmed: 7 5 2022
medline: 15 7 2022
entrez: 6 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgical technique varies dramatically in the performance of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and these differences can potentially lead to variation in outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize surgical techniques used during LRYGB. An anonymous 44-question survey was distributed by email to all bariatric surgeons with membership in the ASMBS, SAGES, and ACS from April to June 2020. Questions were designed to evaluate surgeon demographics, experience, and variation of techniques. Only surgeons who performed LRYGB within the past year were included for analysis. A total of 534 (18.8%) surgeons responded and the majority (97.0%) reported performing LRYGB in the past year. Surgeons were predominantly from the USA (77.8%). For preoperative work-up, 20.1% performed upper gastrointestinal series while 60.8% performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Limb length evaluation revealed mean Roux and biliopancreatic limb lengths of 124.1 ± 29.4 cm and 67.4 ± 32.2 cm, respectively. The gastrojejunostomy was most commonly formed using a linear stapler with handsewn closure of the common enterotomy (53.1%) and the jejunojejunostomy using a linear stapled anastomotic technique with handsewn closure of the common enterotomy (60.6%). The majority of surgeons closed the jejunojejunostomy mesenteric defect (91.1%) and one of the antecolic or retrocolic mesenteric defects (65.1%). Intraoperative leak tests were performed in 95.9% of cases. Only 22.1% of surgeons routinely performed upper gastrointestinal swallow studies postoperatively. There are wide variations in pre- and intraoperative practice patterns for LRYGB. Further clinical trials designed to evaluate the impact of these practice pattern differences on patient outcomes are warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35522385
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06087-9
pii: 10.1007/s11695-022-06087-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2357-2365

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Trogdon JG, Finkelstein EA, Hylands T, et al. Indirect costs of obesity: a review of the current literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):489–500.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00472.x
Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;22(347):f5934.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934
Müller-Stich BP, Senft JD, Warschkow R, et al. Surgical versus medical treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in nonseverely obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):421–9.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001014
Cohen RV, Pereira TV, Aboud CM, et al. Effect of gastric bypass vs best medical treatment on early-stage chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):e200420.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0420
Kizy S, Jahansouz C, Downey MC, et al. National trends in bariatric surgery 2012–2015: demographics, procedure selection, readmissions, and cost. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2933–9.
Gonzalez-Heredia R, Sanchez-Johnsen L, Valbuena VS, et al. Surgical management of super-super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):2097–102.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4465-6
Shoar S, Saber AA. Long-term and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):170–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.011
Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897
Roslin M, Tugertimur B, Zarabi S, et al. Is there a better design for a bariatric procedure? The case for a single anastomosis duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):4077–86.
Sharples AJ, Mahawar K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing long-term outcomes of Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):664–72.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04235-2
Madan AK, Harper JL, Tichansky DS, et al. Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166–72; discussion 72–3.
Shabino PJ, Khoraki J, Elegbede AF, et al. Reduction of surgical site infections after laparoscopic gastric bypass with circular stapled gastrojejunostomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):4–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.003
Barr AC, Lak KL, Helm MC, et al. Linear vs. circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(12):4098–101.
Fakas S, Elias M, Lim D, et al. Comparison of gastrojejunostomy techniques and anastomotic complications: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov 06.
Romeijn MM, van Hoef S, Janssen L, et al. Comparison of linear versus circular-stapled gastroenterostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Obes Surg. 2021 08;31(8):3579–87.
Gould JC, Garren M, Boll V, et al. The impact of circular stapler diameter on the incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis and weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(7):1017–20.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0207-5
Markar SR, Penna M, Venkat-Ramen V, et al. Influence of circular stapler diameter on postoperative stenosis after laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 2012 Mar-Apr;8(2):230–5.
Shelton J, Mocanu V, Dang JT, et al. Implications of technical factors in development of early sleeve stenosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis using the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Obes Surg. 2021 06;31(6):2373–9.
Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):563–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.026
Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(6):889–91.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.159
Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, et al. Projected U.S. state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019 12 19;381(25):2440–50.
Stefanidis D, Kuwada TS, Gersin KS. The importance of the length of the limbs for gastric bypass patients–an evidence-based review. Obes Surg. 2011;21(1):119–24.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0239-3
Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Parmar C, et al. Small bowel limb lengths and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):660–71.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2050-2
Pitt SC, Schwartz TA, Chu D. AAPOR reporting guidelines for survey studies. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(8):785–6.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0543
Mocanu V, Mihajlovic I, Dang JT, et al. Evolving trends in North American gastric bypass delivery: a retrospective MBSAQIP analysis of technical factors and outcomes from 2015 to 2018. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):151–8.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04889-3
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;07(95):103208.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Zorrilla-Nunez LF, Campbell A, Giambartolomei G, et al. The importance of the biliopancreatic limb length in gastric bypass: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 01;15(1):43–9.
Aghajani E, Jacobsen HJ, Nergaard BJ, et al. Internal hernia after gastric bypass: a new and simplified technique for laparoscopic primary closure of the mesenteric defects. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):641–5.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1790-5
Stenberg E, Szabo E, Ågren G, et al. Closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1397–404.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01126-5
Steele KE, Prokopowicz GP, Magnuson T, et al. Laparoscopic antecolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with closure of internal defects leads to fewer internal hernias than the retrocolic approach. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(9):2056–61.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9749-7
Kristensen SD, Floyd AK, Naver L, et al. Does the closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery cause complications? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):459–64.
Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679–84.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8819-5
Brockmeyer JR, Simon TE, Jacob RK, et al. Upper gastrointestinal swallow study following bariatric surgery: institutional review and review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22(7):1039–43.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0658-4
Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Pouch size after gastric bypass does not correlate with weight loss outcome. Obes Surg. 2011;21(9):1350–4.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0460-8
Edholm D, Ottosson J, Sundbom M. Importance of pouch size in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study of 14,168 patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):2011–5.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4432-2
Boerboom A, Cooiman M, Aarts E, et al. An extended pouch in a Roux-En-Y gastric bypass reduces weight regain: 3-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2020;30(1):3–10.
Beckmann JH, Bernsmeier A, Kersebaum JN, et al. The impact of robotics in learning Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective analysis of 214 laparoscopic and robotic procedures: robotic vs. laparoscopic RYGB. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2403–10.

Auteurs

Jerry T Dang (JT)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada. dang2@ualberta.ca.

Andy Deprato (A)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.

Kevin Verhoeff (K)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.

Warren Sun (W)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.

Armaan Pandey (A)

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Valentin Mocanu (V)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.

Shahzeer Karmali (S)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Centre for Advancement of Surgical Education and Simulation, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Noah J Switzer (NJ)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Centre for Advancement of Surgical Education and Simulation, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Ninh T Nguyen (NT)

Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH