Optimal Procedures for Double Tract Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy Assessed by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45.
Gastrectomy
Postgastrectomy syndromes
Quality of life
Reconstructive surgical procedure
Stomach neoplasms
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
ISSN: 1873-4626
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9706084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
14
12
2021
accepted:
10
04
2022
pubmed:
7
5
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
entrez:
6
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (PGDT) is commonly performed for proximal gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer, the impact of the procedure on postoperative quality of life (QOL) has not been clarified. We aimed to clarify the optimal PGDT procedure in terms of postoperative QOL. Postoperative QOL was analyzed in 172 patients who underwent PGDT for proximal gastric cancer and were enrolled in the PGSAS-NEXT study, a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan (UMIN000032221), in relation to the remnant stomach size, length of interposed jejunum between the esophagojejunostomy (E-J) and jejunogastrostomy (J-G), and size of the J-G. The remnant stomach size was approximately one-third in 13, half in 97, and two-thirds in 60 patients. Dissatisfaction scores for symptoms, diet, work, and daily life subscales were lower in patients with a larger stomach (p < 0.05). These patients also scored better in terms of weight loss (- 13.5%, - 14.0%, and - 11.2%, respectively) and amount of food ingested per meal (52%, 62%, and 66%). The length of the interposed jejunum was ≤ 10 cm in 62 and ≥ 11 cm in 97 patients. Weight loss (- 11.3% and - 13.8%) and dissatisfaction scores were better in the ≤ 10 cm group (p < 0.05). J-G size was ≤ 5 cm in 27 and ≥ 6 cm in 135 patients. The amount of food ingested (56%, 64%) and dissatisfaction scores were better in the > 6 cm group (p < 0.05). Larger remnant stomach, shorter length of interposed jejunum, and longer J-G might contribute to better postoperative QOL after PGDT.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Although double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (PGDT) is commonly performed for proximal gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer, the impact of the procedure on postoperative quality of life (QOL) has not been clarified. We aimed to clarify the optimal PGDT procedure in terms of postoperative QOL.
METHODS
Postoperative QOL was analyzed in 172 patients who underwent PGDT for proximal gastric cancer and were enrolled in the PGSAS-NEXT study, a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan (UMIN000032221), in relation to the remnant stomach size, length of interposed jejunum between the esophagojejunostomy (E-J) and jejunogastrostomy (J-G), and size of the J-G.
RESULTS
The remnant stomach size was approximately one-third in 13, half in 97, and two-thirds in 60 patients. Dissatisfaction scores for symptoms, diet, work, and daily life subscales were lower in patients with a larger stomach (p < 0.05). These patients also scored better in terms of weight loss (- 13.5%, - 14.0%, and - 11.2%, respectively) and amount of food ingested per meal (52%, 62%, and 66%). The length of the interposed jejunum was ≤ 10 cm in 62 and ≥ 11 cm in 97 patients. Weight loss (- 11.3% and - 13.8%) and dissatisfaction scores were better in the ≤ 10 cm group (p < 0.05). J-G size was ≤ 5 cm in 27 and ≥ 6 cm in 135 patients. The amount of food ingested (56%, 64%) and dissatisfaction scores were better in the > 6 cm group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Larger remnant stomach, shorter length of interposed jejunum, and longer J-G might contribute to better postoperative QOL after PGDT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35524078
doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05328-7
pii: 10.1007/s11605-022-05328-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1817-1829Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Références
Crew KD NA. Epidemiology of gastric cance. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(3):354-62.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354
Inoue M. Changing epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(Suppl 1):3-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0658-5
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2020.
Nakada K, Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Kinami S, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(1):147-58.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0344-4
Nakada K, Kawashima Y, Kinami S, Fukushima R, Yabusaki H, Seshimo A, et al. Comparison of effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on patients’ quality of life assessed by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;13(5):461-75.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.461
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):101–12.
Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(10):3961-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5429-9
Hayami M, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Mine S, Ohashi M, Kumagai K, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Flap Technique for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Third of the Stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(6):1635-42.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5782-x
Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(2):407-16.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0377-8
Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(1):141-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0257-7
Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Doki Y, Mine S, Terashima M, Yasuda T, et al. Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Esophagogastric Junction Tumors: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2019.
Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S, Ueyama S, Tanaka N, Muraoka A, et al. Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3(1):96-103.
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12216
Yamashita Y, Yamamoto A, Tamamori Y, Yoshii M, Nishiguchi Y. Side overlap esophagogastrostomy to prevent reflux after proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(4):728-35.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0674-5
Nomura E LS, Kawai M, Yamazaki M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K and Uchiyama K. Functional outcomes by reconstruction technique following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: double tract versus jejunal interposition. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12(20).
Nakamura M, Yamaue H. Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: a review of the literature published from 2000 to 2014. Surg Today. 2016;46(5):517-27.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1185-4
Yabusaki H, Kodera Y, Fukushima N, Hiki N, Kinami S, Yoshida M, et al. Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study. World J Surg. 2020;44(10):3433-40.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05629-5
Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Shirai J, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Tsuchida K, et al. Body weight loss after surgery is an independent risk factor for continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):2000-6.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2776-6
Kubo H, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kawaguchi T, Kosuga T, Okamoto K, et al. Impact of Body Weight Loss on Recurrence After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Anticancer Research. 2016;36:807-14.
pubmed: 26851044
Namikawa T, Hiki N, Kinami S, Okabe H, Urushihara T, Kawahira H, et al. Factors that minimize postgastrectomy symptoms following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: assessment using a newly developed scale (PGSAS-45). Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(2):397-406.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0366-y
Nomura E, Lee SW, Tokuhara T, Kawai M, Uchiyama K. Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following open and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59(118):1677-81.
pubmed: 22584424
Inada T, Yoshida M, Ikeda M, Yumiba T, Matsumoto H, Takagane A, et al. Evaluation of QOL after proximal gastrectomy using a newly developed assessment scale (PGSAS-45). World J Surg. 2014;38(12):3152-62.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2712-y
Misawa K, Terashima M, Uenosono Y, Ota S, Hata H, Noro H, et al. Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms after distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45). Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(3):675-81.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0407-6
Konishi H, Nakada K, Kawamura M, Iwasaki T, Murakami K, Mitsumori N, et al. Impaired Gastrointestinal Function Affects Symptoms and Alimentary Status in Patients After Gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2016;40(11):2713-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3613-z
Gustavsson S, Ilstrup DM, Morrison P, Kelly KA. Roux-Y stasis syndrome after gastrectomy. The American Journal of Surgery. 1988;155(3):490-4.
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80120-X
Kinami S, Aizawa M, Yamashita H, Kumagai K, Kamiya S, Toda M, et al. The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey. Gastric Cancer. 2021;24(1):22-30.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01104-1
Tanaka K, Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Noji T, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with oblique jejunogastrostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(6):995-1002.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1587-4
Fujimoto D, Taniguchi K, Kobayashi H. Double-Tract Reconstruction Designed to Allow More Food Flow to the Remnant Stomach After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2020;44(8):2728-35.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05496-0
Yamashita K, Iwatsuki M, Koga Y, Toihata T, Kiyozumi Y, Kuroda D, et al. Preservation of physiological passage through the remnant stomach prevents postoperative malnutrition after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction. Surg Today. 2019;49(9):748-54.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01799-5
Kobayashi D, Kodera Y, Fujiwara M, Koike M, Nakayama G, Nakao A. Assessment of quality of life after gastrectomy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):357-64.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0860-2
Kinami S, Takahashi M, Urushihara T, Ikeda M, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, et al. Background factors influencing postgastrectomy syndromes after various types of gastrectomy. World J Clin Cases. 2018;6(16):1111-20.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1111