Medical Student Perspectives on Undergraduate Oncology Education in the UK.

Feedback Medical education Medical students Peer-learning Teaching Undergraduate curriculum

Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
received: 11 01 2022
revised: 31 03 2022
accepted: 27 04 2022
pubmed: 21 5 2022
medline: 14 7 2022
entrez: 20 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies (BONUS) surveyed students who attended an oncology revision day to determine their views on the current quantity, quality and type of curriculum-based oncology teaching they have experienced. Students attending two BONUS revision days received a questionnaire assessing their experience of oncology teaching within the medical curriculum and interest in pursuing a future career in oncology using a 10-point Likert scale. Data were collected with informed consent to be anonymised and used for research. Student demographics and qualitative and quantitative data about experiences of oncology education were analysed. In total, 451 students registered to attend the revision days. After removal of duplicates, non-responders and non-UK participants, responses from 153 students studying across years 1-6 at 22 UK medical schools were analysed. The mean quantity of oncology lectures students reported receiving was 8.9 hours and the mean quantity of clinic/ward-based oncology teaching was 7.5 hours. Ninety (62.1%) of the 145 students who responded to the relevant question reported that they had received dedicated teaching in oncology. Students who had received dedicated oncology teaching reported a statistically significantly higher mean quality 6.1 (95% confidence interval 5.6-6.5) versus 5.0 (95% confidence interval 4.3-5.5; P = 0.003) and quantity 5.2 (95% confidence interval 4.7-5.6) versus 4.3 (95% confidence interval 3.7-4.9; P = 0.03) of oncology teaching compared with those who had not received this. Appropriate oncology education is essential for all medical students due to the high prevalence of cancer. All future doctors need the appropriate knowledge and communication skills to care for cancer patients. Our analysis provides quantitative evidence to support the value of specialist oncology teaching within the medical school curriculum in improving student-reported experience. National student-led revision days and events may widen interest in a future career in oncology and aid collaboration between oncology societies. It is important for the general undergraduate medical curriculum to integrate specialty content. An integrated curriculum should facilitate a holistic approach that spans prevention, screening, treatment and palliation rather than being split by subspeciality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35595594
pii: S0936-6555(22)00220-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.04.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e355-e364

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

S R Heritage (SR)

School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: sophierebecca56@gmail.com.

K Lynch-Kelly (K)

GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.

J Kalvala (J)

School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

R Tulloch (R)

School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

A Devasar (A)

Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

J Harewood (J)

School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

E Khoury (E)

School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

A Abdelwahed (A)

School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

A Fung (A)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

C M Bigogno (CM)

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

R Gray (R)

School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

S Keshwara (S)

Whiston Hospital, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, UK.

P J S Joseph (PJS)

School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

P Selby (P)

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.

H Tharmalingam (H)

Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH