Burnout and poor perceived health in flexible working time in Japanese employees: the role of self-endangering behavior in relation to workaholism, work engagement, and job stressors.
Burnout
Flexible working time
Job stress
Perceived health
Self-endangering behavior
Work engagement
Workaholism
Journal
Industrial health
ISSN: 1880-8026
Titre abrégé: Ind Health
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 2985065R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 07 2022
31 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
26
5
2022
medline:
3
8
2022
entrez:
25
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study aim was to examine whether flexible working time was associated with burnout and poor perceived health in relation to the work-related psychological/behavioral factors of self-endangering work behavior (SEWB), workaholism, work engagement, and job stressors. We analyzed data obtained from an Internet survey of 600 full-time Japanese employees. We also proposed a causal model using path analysis to investigate the overall relationships of burnout and perceived health to psychological/behavioral factors. The results indicated that flexible working time was associated with adverse work-related consequences and factors such as increased burnout, working hours, SEWB, workaholism, and job demands, and with positive factors such as improvement of work engagement. The path analysis suggested that burnout was caused by workaholism both directly and via SEWB, and by low job decision latitude, and was reduced by work engagement. Similarly, it was observed that poor health was caused by workaholism via SEWB, and reduced by work engagement. Thus, SEWB is driven by workaholism and plays a key role in the adverse health consequences of flexible working time. For workers to benefit from flexible working time, it is important to improve workaholism, SEWB, and low job decision latitude, and to develop work engagement in the workplace.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35613895
doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2022-0063
pmc: PMC9453555
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
295-306Références
Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Dec 15;9(1):36-48
pubmed: 35079603
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Oct;16(4):468-82
pubmed: 21787085
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422
pubmed: 11148311
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):212-220
pubmed: 28425778
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;(2):CD008009
pubmed: 20166100
Ind Health. 2021 Oct 5;59(5):285-292
pubmed: 34421102
Int J Behav Med. 2015 Feb;22(1):18-23
pubmed: 24696043
Stress Health. 2014 Feb;30(1):71-81
pubmed: 23723156
Rev Saude Publica. 2004 Dec;38 Suppl:11-8
pubmed: 15608909
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(24):3286-95
pubmed: 19146587
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Aug;56(8):892-7
pubmed: 25099418
Ind Health. 2009 Oct;47(5):503-8
pubmed: 19834259
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2019 Mar 25;61(2):59-68
pubmed: 30555110
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1819
pubmed: 32849072
Ind Health. 2009 Oct;47(5):495-502
pubmed: 19834258
Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;103(2):265-275
pubmed: 3363047
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1524-41
pubmed: 18020794
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 06;5:247
pubmed: 22608035
Int J Behav Med. 2010 Jun;17(2):154-60
pubmed: 20169433