The Comparison of Autologous Bone, Methyl-Methacrylate, Porous Polyethylene, and Titanium Mesh in Cranioplasty.
Journal
Turkish neurosurgery
ISSN: 2651-5032
Titre abrégé: Turk Neurosurg
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9423821
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
pubmed:
3
6
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
entrez:
2
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To discuss four different materials that are frequently used in cranioplasty, and to reveal their advantages and disadvantages. We retrospectively reviewed 85 of our cranioplasty surgeries between 2016 and 2019. Reconstruction surgeries were excluded from our study due to craniofacial trauma. Of the materials used in cranioplasty, 33 are autologous bone, 32 are methyl-methacrylate, 12 are porous polyethylene, and 8 are titanium mesh. Complications developed in 16 patients. Of these, 10 are infection, 3 are flap collapse, 2 are wound healing disorders, and 1 is reactive effusion complications due to the used material. The highest complication rate was 21.9% in cranioplasty with methyl-methacrylate. No major complications were observed in cranioplasty with titanium mesh. Cranioplasty, which are among the surgeries with high complications in neurosurgery, maintain their importance today. As technology is developed and cost problems are resolved, cranioplasty takes its place among the safer and standard neurosurgical operations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35652181
doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.37476-21.1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Methacrylates
0
Methylmethacrylate
196OC77688
Polyethylene
9002-88-4
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM