FcRn Antagonism Leads to a Decrease of Desmoglein-Specific B Cells: Secondary Analysis of a Phase 2 Study of Efgartigimod in Pemphigus Vulgaris and Pemphigus Foliaceus.

B cells FcRn efgartigimod immunoglobulin G pemphigus foliaceus (PF) pemphigus vulgaris (PV)

Journal

Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 26 01 2022
accepted: 29 03 2022
entrez: 6 6 2022
pubmed: 7 6 2022
medline: 9 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels are maintained by the IgG-recycling neonatal Fc-receptor (FcRn). Pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus are debilitating autoimmune disorders triggered by IgG autoantibodies against mucosal and epidermal desmogleins. Recently, a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03334058; https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03334058) was completed in participants with pemphigus using efgartigimod, an FcRn inhibitor, in combination with prednisone. Efgartigimod demonstrated an early effect on diease activity and was well tolerated. In addition to the safety and efficacy assessment, clinical trials present an opportunity to gain more insights into the mechanism of disease, the mode of action of treatment, and potential for corticosteroid-sparing activity. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of FcRn antagonism by efgartigimod on immunological parameters known to be directly involved in pemphigus pathology, such as cellular and serological responses. We investigated total and antigen-specific IgG subclass level kinetics during and after treatment, assessed antigen-specific B-cell responses, followed T- and B-cell immunophenotypes, and analyzed how different immunophenotypes link to clinical response. Treatment resulted in reduction of total IgG as well as autoreactive IgG antibody levels. Surprisingly, unlike total IgG and vaccine- or natural-infection-elicited IgG, which returned to baseline levels after stopping efgartigimod treatment, autoreactive antibody levels remained low in several study participants. Efgartigimod showed no effect on total leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, or lymphocytes in patients treated with extended efgartigimod therapy. Intriguingly, antigen-specific analyses revealed a loss of desmoglein-specific B cells in several participants responding to efgartigimod, in line with prolonged reduction of pathogenic IgG levels. Efgartigimod treatment of participants with pemphigus improved their conditions and exerted an immunomodulatory effect beyond the blockade of IgG recycling. Further studies in larger populations with an appropriate placebo control are needed to confirm these potentially important observations to establish long-term clinical responses in autoimmune diseases.

Sections du résumé

Background
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels are maintained by the IgG-recycling neonatal Fc-receptor (FcRn). Pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus are debilitating autoimmune disorders triggered by IgG autoantibodies against mucosal and epidermal desmogleins. Recently, a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03334058; https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03334058) was completed in participants with pemphigus using efgartigimod, an FcRn inhibitor, in combination with prednisone. Efgartigimod demonstrated an early effect on diease activity and was well tolerated. In addition to the safety and efficacy assessment, clinical trials present an opportunity to gain more insights into the mechanism of disease, the mode of action of treatment, and potential for corticosteroid-sparing activity.
Objective
The aim of our study was to assess the impact of FcRn antagonism by efgartigimod on immunological parameters known to be directly involved in pemphigus pathology, such as cellular and serological responses.
Methods
We investigated total and antigen-specific IgG subclass level kinetics during and after treatment, assessed antigen-specific B-cell responses, followed T- and B-cell immunophenotypes, and analyzed how different immunophenotypes link to clinical response.
Results
Treatment resulted in reduction of total IgG as well as autoreactive IgG antibody levels. Surprisingly, unlike total IgG and vaccine- or natural-infection-elicited IgG, which returned to baseline levels after stopping efgartigimod treatment, autoreactive antibody levels remained low in several study participants. Efgartigimod showed no effect on total leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, or lymphocytes in patients treated with extended efgartigimod therapy. Intriguingly, antigen-specific analyses revealed a loss of desmoglein-specific B cells in several participants responding to efgartigimod, in line with prolonged reduction of pathogenic IgG levels.
Conclusions
Efgartigimod treatment of participants with pemphigus improved their conditions and exerted an immunomodulatory effect beyond the blockade of IgG recycling. Further studies in larger populations with an appropriate placebo control are needed to confirm these potentially important observations to establish long-term clinical responses in autoimmune diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35663943
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.863095
pmc: PMC9157593
doi:

Substances chimiques

Autoantibodies 0
Desmogleins 0
Immunoglobulin G 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03334058']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

863095

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Maho-Vaillant, Sips, Golinski, Vidarsson, Goebeler, Stoevesandt, Bata-Csörgő, Balbino, Verheesen, Joly, Hertl and Calbo.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

ZB-C reports consulting fees for Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, and argenx. MG has served as a consultant and on advisory boards for argenx, Biotest, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB. MS, BB, and PV are employed by argenx. PJ has served as a consultant for Amgen, Principia Biopharma, argenx, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Thermo Fisher, Lilly, Sanofi, Akari, Chugai, Novartis, Kezar, Genentech, and Topas. GV is a paid consultant for argenx. SC, MM-V, and M-LG as employees of INSERM U1234, Normandie University have a collaborative research agreement with argenx. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This study received funding from Argenx. The funder had the following involvement with the study: participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, and review and approval of the publication. Argenx also funded the medical writing support of this manuscript.

Références

Curr Opin Immunol. 2018 Dec;55:81-88
pubmed: 30390507
Front Immunol. 2019 Dec 03;10:2824
pubmed: 31849989
J Dermatol Sci. 2001 May;26(1):55-61
pubmed: 11323221
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015 Nov;36(11):1367-76
pubmed: 26456588
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 24;7(1):13921
pubmed: 29066741
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1976 Mar;151(3):594-8
pubmed: 768993
Neurology. 2019 Jun 4;92(23):e2661-e2673
pubmed: 31118245
Front Immunol. 2018 Apr 23;9:835
pubmed: 29740441
J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Dec;128(12):2850-8
pubmed: 18563178
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021 Nov 1;33(6):592-597
pubmed: 34402453
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Nov;137(11):2362-2370
pubmed: 28647348
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2295-2305
pubmed: 34097368
J Immunol. 2017 Jul 1;199(1):204-211
pubmed: 28566370
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Feb 14;10(428):
pubmed: 29444980
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Jun;58(6):1043-6
pubmed: 18339444
J Clin Invest. 2005 Apr;115(4):888-99
pubmed: 15841178
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Oct;23(10):1283-8
pubmed: 16186811
Front Immunol. 2019 Jun 26;10:1477
pubmed: 31293600
Arch Dermatol. 2009 May;145(5):529-35
pubmed: 19451496
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Mar 6;5(175):175ra30
pubmed: 23467561
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Feb;54(1):1-25
pubmed: 29313220
Autoimmun Rev. 2003 May;2(3):119-25
pubmed: 12848952
J Clin Invest. 2018 Oct 1;128(10):4372-4386
pubmed: 30040076
Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2031-2040
pubmed: 28342637
Lupus. 2021 Oct;30(12):1938-1945
pubmed: 34634960
J Immunol. 2008 Dec 1;181(11):7550-61
pubmed: 19017944
Science. 2003 Sep 5;301(5638):1374-7
pubmed: 12920303
Exp Dermatol. 2006 Aug;15(8):606-14
pubmed: 16842599
APMIS. 1993 Apr;101(4):319-29
pubmed: 8323742
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Jan;139(1):31-37
pubmed: 30301637
Front Immunol. 2020 Feb 25;11:32
pubmed: 32158442
Blood. 2010 Jun 17;115(24):5026-36
pubmed: 20231422
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 May 1;156(5):545-552
pubmed: 32186656
Clin Immunol. 2008 Feb;126(2):189-201
pubmed: 18077220
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 15;9(1):30
pubmed: 23947590
Front Immunol. 2017 May 31;8:603
pubmed: 28620373
Am J Hematol. 2020 Feb;95(2):178-187
pubmed: 31821591
Immunobiology. 2002 Dec;206(5):502-13
pubmed: 12607725
Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11(5):119S-125S
pubmed: 1745617
Immunol Lett. 2021 Sep;237:42-57
pubmed: 34186155
Clin Immunol. 2001 Dec;101(3):276-83
pubmed: 11726219
Front Immunol. 2019 Aug 07;10:1794
pubmed: 31440235
J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Dec;128(12):2859-69
pubmed: 18563177
J Clin Invest. 2006 May;116(5):1159-66
pubmed: 16670756
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Mar 30;11(4):311-31
pubmed: 22460124
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:
pubmed: 23807906
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Dec;21(6):765-782
pubmed: 32860200
Cell Rep. 2019 Jul 23;28(4):909-922.e6
pubmed: 31340153
J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Sep;129(9):2202-10
pubmed: 19282839
Front Immunol. 2020 Jul 03;11:1393
pubmed: 32719679
J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Dec;141(12):2858-2865.e4
pubmed: 34126109
Front Immunol. 2019 Jun 14;10:1375
pubmed: 31258541
Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 18;5(12):eaax9586
pubmed: 31897428
J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Sep;141(9):2132-2140.e1
pubmed: 33766510
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018 May;115(5):1265-1278
pubmed: 29315477
J Autoimmun. 2007 Aug;29(1):1-9
pubmed: 17582741
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Oct;185(4):745-755
pubmed: 33942286
Front Immunol. 2014 Aug 27;5:408
pubmed: 25221553
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):882-894
pubmed: 31498102
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Mar;186(3):429-439
pubmed: 34608631
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 26;11:603931
pubmed: 33324387
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun;147(6):2358-2369
pubmed: 33221382

Auteurs

Maud Maho-Vaillant (M)

Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
INSERM U1234, Normandie University, Rouen, France.

Magdalena Sips (M)

argenx, Ghent, Belgium.

Marie-Laure Golinski (ML)

Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
INSERM U1234, Normandie University, Rouen, France.

Gestur Vidarsson (G)

Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Matthias Goebeler (M)

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Johanna Stoevesandt (J)

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Zsuzsanna Bata-Csörgő (Z)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Bianca Balbino (B)

argenx, Ghent, Belgium.

Peter Verheesen (P)

argenx, Ghent, Belgium.

Pascal Joly (P)

Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

Michael Hertl (M)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Sébastien Calbo (S)

INSERM U1234, Normandie University, Rouen, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH