Preparing for a Crowded Cosmetic Market: A Resident Training Model for Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Treatments.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
6
2022
medline:
30
7
2022
entrez:
6
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient demand for nonsurgical and minimally invasive cosmetic treatments has increased in recent years, resulting in a growing market that is particularly vulnerable to specialty creep. Despite this growing demand, nonsurgical cosmetic training for plastic surgery residents is often inconsistent and challenging. To ensure the continued safe and effective delivery of nonsurgical cosmetic care by board-certified plastic surgeons, it is critical to implement standardized training models for plastic surgery residents. In this Special Topic article, the authors describe their experience with a resident-run clinic training model that incorporates graduated autonomy, volunteer patient recruitment, and grant-based industry support that has been successfully implemented at their institution for the past 6 years. The article provides a framework for a resident educational model and addresses common obstacles in resident cosmetic training. The authors also provide recommendations for patient recruitment, optimizing clinic workflow, and the management of patient complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35666161
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009357
pii: 00006534-202208000-00018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
317-324Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
The Aesthetic Society’s cosmetic surgery national data bank: Statistics 2019. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(Suppl 1):1–26.
D’Amico RA, Saltz R, Rohrich RJ, et al. Risks and opportunities for plastic surgeons in a widening cosmetic medicine market: Future demand, consumer preferences, and trends in practitioners’ services. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1787–1792.
Richards BG, Schleicher WF, D’Souza GF, Isakov R, Zins JE. The role of injectables in aesthetic surgery: Financial implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:1039–1043.
Jacono AA, Malone MH, Lavin TJ. Nonsurgical facial rejuvenation procedures in patients under 50 prior to undergoing facelift: Habits, costs, and results. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:448–453.
McNichols CHL, Diaconu S, Alfadil S, et al. Cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery residency programs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1491.
Kraft CT, Harake MS, Janis JE. Longitudinal assessment of aesthetic plastic surgery training in the United States: The effect of increased ACGME case log minimum requirements. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:NP76–NP82.
Kumar N, Rahman E. Global needs-assessment for a postgraduate program on non-surgical facial aesthetics. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;41:501–510.
Momeni A, Kim RY, Wan DC, Izadpanah A, Lee GK. Aesthetic surgery training during residency in the United States: A comparison of the integrated, combined, and independent training models. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:281923.
Day KM, Scott JK, Gao L, et al. Progressive surgical autonomy in a plastic surgery resident clinic. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1318.
Motakef S, Campwala I, Gupta S. Establishing milestones for facial injectables in plastic surgery residency training: Four-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:NP140–NP141.
Rohrich RJ. The “Soft-Tissue Fillers and Neuromodulators: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives” supplement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(Suppl):1S–3S.