One Drop Improves Productivity for Workers With Type 2 Diabetes: One Drop for Workers With Type 2 Diabetes.
Journal
Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
ISSN: 1536-5948
Titre abrégé: J Occup Environ Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9504688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
9
6
2022
medline:
10
8
2022
entrez:
8
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diabetes research on work productivity has been largely cross-sectional and retrospective, with only one known randomized controlled trial (RCT) published, to our knowledge. Secondary analysis of the Fit-One RCT tested the effect of One Drop's digital health program on workplace productivity outcomes, absenteeism, and presenteeism, for employees and specifically for older workers with type 2 diabetes. Analysis of the 3-month Fit-One trial data from employees who have type 2 diabetes explored productivity using logistic analyses and generalized estimating equations. Treatment and control group comparisons showed that workers ( N = 125) using One Drop see direct benefits to workplace productivity, which leads to productivity savings for employers. This was the first RCT to demonstrate that a mobile health application for managing type 2 diabetes can positively affect productivity at work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35672921
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002577
pii: 00043764-202208000-00016
pmc: PMC9377500
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e452-e458Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: All authors are/were employees of One Drop, part of Informed Data Systems, Inc.
Références
Bullard KM, Cowie CC, Lessem SE, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in adults by diabetes type—United States, 2016. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2018;67:359–361.
Association AD. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2017. Diabetes Care . 2018;41:917–928.
Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med . 2012;29:855–862.
Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ . 2000;321:405–412.
Fisher L, Gonzalez JS, Polonsky WH. The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: a call for greater clarity and precision. Diabet Med . 2014;31:764–772.
Xu Y, Tong GYY, Lee JY. Investigation on the association between diabetes distress and productivity among patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in the primary healthcare institutions. Prim Care Diabetes . 2020;14:538–544.
Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Hirsch AG, Brandenburg NA. Lost productive time and costs due to diabetes and diabetic neuropathic pain in the US workforce. J Occup Environ Med . 2007;49:672–679.
Shultz KS, Wang M. The influence of specific physical health conditions on retirement decisions. Int J Aging Hum Dev . 2007;65:149–161.
Leonard-Barton D, Swap WC, Barton G. Critical Knowledge Transfer: Tools for Managing Your Company's Deep Smarts . Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2015.
Brooke L, Taylor P. Older workers and employment: managing age relations. Ageing Soc . 2005;25:415–429.
Buyens D, Van Dijk H, Dewilde T, De Vos A. The aging workforce: perceptions of career ending. J Manag Psychol . 2009.
Fletcher JM, Richards MR. Diabetes's 'health shock' to schooling and earnings: increased dropout rates and lower wages and employment in young adults. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2012;31:27–34.
Pedron S, Emmert-Fees K, Laxy M, Schwettmann L. The impact of diabetes on labour market participation: a systematic review of results and methods. BMC Public Health . 2019;19:25.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment projections: median age of the labor force, by sex, race, and ethnicity. 2021. Updated September 8, 2021. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/median-age-labor-force.htm . Accessed October 21, 2021.
Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr . 2010;8:29.
Barakovic Husic J, Melero FJ, Barakovic S, et al. Aging at work: a review of recent trends and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2020;17:7659.
Stynen D, Jansen NW, Kant IJ. The impact of depression and diabetes mellitus on older workers' functioning. J Psychosom Res . 2015;79:604–613.
Mori T, Nagata T, Nagata M, Otani M, Fujino Y, Mori K. The impact of diabetes status on presenteeism in Japan. J Occup Environ Med . 2020;62:654–661.
Rumball-Smith J, Barthold D, Nandi A, Heymann J. Diabetes associated with early labor-force exit: a comparison of sixteen high-income countries. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2014;33:110–115.
Rodriguez-Sanchez B, Alessie RJM, Feenstra TL, Angelini V. The relationship between diabetes, diabetes-related complications and productive activities among older Europeans. Eur J Health Econ . 2018;19:719–734.
Osborn CY, Hirsch A, Sears LE, et al. One Drop app with an activity tracker for adults with type 1 diabetes: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth . 2020;8:e16745.
Osborn CY, Heyman M, Huddleston B, Van Ginkel J, Rodbard D, Dachis J. The One Drop mobile app with in-app coaching improves blood glucose and self-care. 2017:A228. Available at: https://ada.scientificposters.com/epsAbstractADA.cfm?id=2 . Accessed June 29, 2022.
Osborn CY, van Ginkel JR, Rodbard D, et al. One Drop | Mobile: an evaluation of hemoglobin A 1c improvement linked to app engagement. JMIR Diabetes . 2017;2:e21.
Kumar S, Moseson H, Uppal J, Juusola JL. A diabetes mobile app with in-app coaching from a certified diabetes educator reduces A 1c for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ . 2018;44:226–236.
Stratton E, Jones N, Peters SE, Torous J, Glozier N. Digital mHealth interventions for employees: systematic review and meta-analysis of their effects on workplace outcomes. J Occup Environ Med . 2021;63:e512–e525.
Griffiths AJ, White CM, Thain PK, Bearne LM. The effect of interactive digital interventions on physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int . 2018;38:1623–1634.
Adepoju OE, Bolin JN, Ohsfeldt RL, et al. Can chronic disease management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes reduce productivity-related indirect costs of the disease? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Popul Health Manag . 2013;17:112–120.
Buckingham SA, Williams AJ, Morrissey K, Price L, Harrison J. Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a systematic review. Digit Health . 2019;5:2055207619839883.
Pihlajamäki J, Männikkö R, Tilles-Tirkkonen T, et al; StopDia study group. Digitally supported program for type 2 diabetes risk identification and risk reduction in real-world setting: protocol for the StopDia model and randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health . 2019;19:255.
Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics . 1993;4:353–365.
Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med . 2004;46:398–412.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer costs for employee compensation summary. 2022. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm . Accessed April 8, 2022.
Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, Aggarwal R. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis. Perspect Clin Res . 2016;7:144–146.
Detry MA, Lewis RJ. The intention-to-treat principle: how to assess the true effect of choosing a medical treatment. JAMA . 2014;312:85–86.
Hernán MA, Robins JM. Per-protocol analyses of pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med . 2017;377:1391–1398.
Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Volume 81 . New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
Ma Y, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG. Beyond repeated-measures analysis of variance: advanced statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in anesthesia research. Reg Anesth Pain Med . 2012;37:99–105.
Reilly MC. WPAI Studies Diabetes. 2021. Reilly Associates. Available at: http://www.reillyassociates.net/WPAI_General.html . Accessed October 28, 2021.
Probst TM, Lee HJ, Bazzoli A, Jenkins MR, Bettac EL. Work and non-work sickness presenteeism: the role of workplace COVID-19 climate. J Occup Environ Med . 2021;63:713–718.