Predictors of sacubitril/valsartan high dose tolerability in a real world population with HFrEF.
ARNI
Heart failure
Neprilysin inhibitors
Right ventricular function
Sacubitril valsartan
Journal
ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
revised:
19
04
2022
received:
27
12
2021
accepted:
08
05
2022
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) demonstrated to be superior to enalapril in reducing hospitalizations, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with ambulatory heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), in particular when it is maximally up-titrated. Unfortunately, the target dose is achieved in less than 50% of HFrEF patients, thus undermining the beneficial effects on the outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of Sac/Val and its titration dose on reverse cardiac remodelling and determine which echocardiographic index best predicts the up-titration success. From January 2020 to June 2021, we retrospectively identified 95 patients (65.6 [59.1-72.8] years; 15.8% females) with chronic HFrEF who were prescribed Sac/Val from the HF Clinics of 5 Italian University Hospitals and evaluated the tolerability of Sac/Val high dose (the ability of the patient to achieve and stably tolerate the maximum dose) as the primary endpoint in the cohort. We used a multivariable logistic regression analysis, with a stepwise backward selection method, to determine the independent predictors of Sac/Val maximum dose tolerability, using, as candidate predictors, only variables with a P-value < 0.1 in the univariate analyses. Candidate predictors identified for the multivariable backward logistic regression analysis were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dyslipidaemia, atrial fibrillation, systolic blood pressure (SBP), baseline tolerability of ACEi/ARBs maximum dose, left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LVgLS), LV ejection fraction (EF), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricle (RV) fractional area change (FAC), RV global and free wall longitudinal strain (RVgLS and RV-FW-LS). After the multivariable analysis, only one categorical (ACEi/ARBs maximum dose at baseline) and three continuous (younger age, higher SBP, and higher TAPSE), resulted significantly associated with the study outcome variable with a strong discriminatory capacity (area under the curve 0.874, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.794-0.954) to predict maximum Sac/Val dose tolerability. Our study is the first to analyse the potential role of echocardiography and, in particular, of RV dysfunction, measured by TAPSE, in predicting Sac/Val maximum dose tolerability. Therefore, patients with RV dysfunction (baseline TAPSE <16 mm, in our cohort) might benefit from a different strategy to titrate Sac/Val, such as starting from the lowest dose and/or waiting for a more extended period of observation before attempting with the higher doses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35702942
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13982
pmc: PMC9715790
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
sacubitril
17ERJ0MKGI
Tetrazoles
0
Valsartan
80M03YXJ7I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2909-2917Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 20;8(2):
pubmed: 30791533
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jan;4(1):98-108
pubmed: 21232712
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2020 Jun 30;4(4):1-5
pubmed: 32974431
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 May;21(5):588-597
pubmed: 30972918
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;9(2):e003866
pubmed: 26860970
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):2909-2917
pubmed: 35702942
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 20;10(1):6665
pubmed: 32313194
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Feb 25;27:100486
pubmed: 32140553
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Dec;18(12):1462-1471
pubmed: 27647757
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Nov;21(11):882-888
pubmed: 32740412
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Feb;76(1):20-29
pubmed: 31697901
Circulation. 2008 May 20;117(20):2608-16
pubmed: 18458170
Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;36(4):e12435
pubmed: 29771478
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 17;9(6):
pubmed: 32560431
Intern Med J. 2021 Jan;51(1):87-92
pubmed: 31908131
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;5(5):956-959
pubmed: 30039930
J Card Fail. 2016 May;22(5):385-94
pubmed: 26363091
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2021 Nov;41(6):505-513
pubmed: 34510702
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):2058-2069
pubmed: 33682334
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;16(1):1-11
pubmed: 25525063
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 11;11(1):16335
pubmed: 34381126
Adv Ther. 2018 Jun;35(6):785-795
pubmed: 29777521
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;5(7):747-53
pubmed: 22789943
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;7(1):158-166
pubmed: 31903729
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;55(9):1069-1075
pubmed: 33384015
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Oct 22;31:100656
pubmed: 33134479
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;54(8):774-81
pubmed: 11470385
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Dec;38(7):1957-65
pubmed: 11738300
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;18(10):1228-1234
pubmed: 27283779
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726
pubmed: 34447992
Life (Basel). 2021 Jan 15;11(1):
pubmed: 33467601
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 01;79(2):177-182
pubmed: 34711748
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):
pubmed: 33003523
Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):252-8
pubmed: 20048206
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Sep;53:118-36
pubmed: 26188442