Diagnosis and classification of blepharospasm: Recommendations based on empirical evidence.
Blepharospasm
Craniofacial dystonia
Meige syndrome
Journal
Journal of the neurological sciences
ISSN: 1878-5883
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0375403
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 08 2022
15 08 2022
Historique:
received:
21
02
2022
revised:
18
05
2022
accepted:
06
06
2022
pubmed:
19
6
2022
medline:
5
8
2022
entrez:
18
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Blepharospasm is one of the most common subtypes of dystonia, and often spreads to other body regions. Despite published guidelines, the approach to diagnosis and classification of affected body regions varies among clinicians. To delineate the clinical features used by movement disorder specialists in the diagnosis and classification of blepharospasm according to body regions affected, and to develop recommendations for a more consistent approach. Cross-sectional data for subjects diagnosed with all types of isolated dystonia were acquired from the Dystonia Coalition, an international, multicenter collaborative research network. Data were evaluated to determine how examinations recorded by movement disorder specialists were used to classify blepharospasm as focal, segmental, or multifocal. Among all 3222 participants with isolated dystonia, 210 (6.5%) had a diagnosis of focal blepharospasm. Among these 210 participants, 34 (16.2%) had dystonia outside of upper face region. Factors such as dystonia severity across different body regions and number of body regions affected influenced the classification of blepharospasm as focal, segmental, or multifocal. Although focal blepharospasm is the second most common type of dystonia, a high percentage of individuals given this diagnosis had dystonia outside of the eye/upper face region. These findings are not consistent with existing guidelines for the diagnosis and classification of focal blepharospasm, and point to the need for more specific guidelines for more consistent application of existing recommendations for diagnosis and classification.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Blepharospasm is one of the most common subtypes of dystonia, and often spreads to other body regions. Despite published guidelines, the approach to diagnosis and classification of affected body regions varies among clinicians.
OBJECTIVE
To delineate the clinical features used by movement disorder specialists in the diagnosis and classification of blepharospasm according to body regions affected, and to develop recommendations for a more consistent approach.
METHODS
Cross-sectional data for subjects diagnosed with all types of isolated dystonia were acquired from the Dystonia Coalition, an international, multicenter collaborative research network. Data were evaluated to determine how examinations recorded by movement disorder specialists were used to classify blepharospasm as focal, segmental, or multifocal.
RESULTS
Among all 3222 participants with isolated dystonia, 210 (6.5%) had a diagnosis of focal blepharospasm. Among these 210 participants, 34 (16.2%) had dystonia outside of upper face region. Factors such as dystonia severity across different body regions and number of body regions affected influenced the classification of blepharospasm as focal, segmental, or multifocal.
CONCLUSIONS
Although focal blepharospasm is the second most common type of dystonia, a high percentage of individuals given this diagnosis had dystonia outside of the eye/upper face region. These findings are not consistent with existing guidelines for the diagnosis and classification of focal blepharospasm, and point to the need for more specific guidelines for more consistent application of existing recommendations for diagnosis and classification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35716653
pii: S0022-510X(22)00181-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120319
pmc: PMC9357089
mid: NIHMS1817488
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
120319Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS116025
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS075321
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : U54 TR001456
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS065701
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS119831
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2021 Dec 01;9(2):183-190
pubmed: 35146058
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014 Dec 1;1(4):280-284
pubmed: 25485288
Mov Disord. 2012 Sep 15;27(11):1447-50
pubmed: 22890501
J Neurol. 2007 Jul;254(7):879-83
pubmed: 17401742
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Dec;33:138-141
pubmed: 27727009
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Aug;15(7):483-9
pubmed: 19457699
Mov Disord. 2019 Mar;34(3):317-320
pubmed: 30726575
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Jan;24(1):73-81
pubmed: 27647704
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2019 Mar 01;6(3):250-253
pubmed: 30949557
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;79(4):392-6
pubmed: 17635969
Mov Disord. 2006 Aug;21(8):1175-81
pubmed: 16673404
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207729
pubmed: 30458031
Mov Disord. 2003 Mar;18(3):303-312
pubmed: 12621634
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 16;12:700714
pubmed: 34603182
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Nov;19(11):908-918
pubmed: 33098801
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;91(3):314-320
pubmed: 31848221
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 08;12:660909
pubmed: 33897610
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Oct;91:109-114
pubmed: 34583301
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 May;132:41-3
pubmed: 25764999
Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73
pubmed: 23649720
Neurology. 2013 Jul 16;81(3):236-40
pubmed: 23771487