Bowel recovery after intra- vs extra-corporeal anastomosis for oncologic laparoscopic right hemicolectomy within an ERAS protocol: a retrospective study.
Colon cancer
Complete mesocolic excision
ERAS
Intra-corporeal anastomosis
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
Post-operative ileus
Journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
ISSN: 1435-2451
Titre abrégé: Langenbecks Arch Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9808285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
07
10
2021
accepted:
14
06
2022
pubmed:
22
6
2022
medline:
15
9
2022
entrez:
21
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Restoring bowel continuity after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an intra-corporeal (IC) rather than an extra-corporeal (EC) ileocolic anastomosis may offer advantages in post-operative recovery. The aim of this study was to compare bowel function recovery between these two techniques, in a context of complete mesocolic excision within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. All consecutive patients who underwent oncologic laparoscopic right hemicolectomy from January 2012 to February 2021 in our institution were included in the study. Data were gathered from the prospectively maintained official ERAS (EIAS) database and completed through our institution's electronic health records. The primary endpoint was prolonged post-operative ileus (PPOI), defined as the need to insert a nasogastric tube, or refractory nausea VAS > 4, on or after the third post-operative day. Secondary endpoints were post-operative pain, morbidity and length of hospital stay (LoS). Groups were compared before and after propensity score matching based on age, gender, ASA score, use of epidural analgesia and post-operative complications. A total of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria, 36 (30%) had IC and 72 (70%) EC anastomosis. In the unmatched population, baseline characteristics were similar except for more frequent use of epidural analgesia in the EC group (62 (72.9%) vs. 17 (47.2), p = 0.007). PSM analysis was carried out. Operative time was longer in the IC group (197 min (176-223) vs. 160 (140-189), p < 0.001). The rate of PPOI was similar (2 (5.6%) patients in the IC group vs. 10 (11.6%) in the EC group (p = 0.306)), but time to frist passage of flatus and stool was shorter in the IC group. There was no difference in morbidity but patients after IC anastomosis had lower pain VAS scores at 24 h (p = 0.004) and a trend for a shorter LoS (6 (5-8) days vs 7 (5-10) in the EC group, p = 0.054). After PSM, there were 36 patients in each group. PPOI, time to first flatus and stool, morbidity and LoS were not significantly different although there was a trend for better recovery outcomes in the IC group. Patients in the IC group had significantly longer operative times but less pain at 24 h. Although IC anastomosis was not significantly associated to lower rates of PPOI, it showed trends of faster recovery and significantly less post-operative pain at the expense of longer operating times.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35729399
doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02585-7
pii: 10.1007/s00423-022-02585-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2463-2469Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Schlinkert RT et al (1991) Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34:1030–1031
doi: 10.1007/BF02049971
Arezzo A et al (2015) Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 30:1457–1472
doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2304-9
Carnuccio P et al (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18:5–12
doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1029-4
Wu Q et al (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:348–357
doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0485
Fr J et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.8.762
Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Passera R, Morino M (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled Trial. Ann Surg 270(5):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003519
Gustafsson UO, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0
pubmed: 23052794
Hubner M et al (2015) Randomized clinical trial on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. Ann Surg 261(4):648–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000838
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000838
pubmed: 25119117
Roesel R et al (2021) Bowel function recovery after laparoscopic transverse colectomy within an ERAS program: a comparison to right and left colectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02082-3
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02082-3
pubmed: 33454821
Delaney C, et al (2006) Postoperative ileus: profiles, risk factors, and definitions—a framework for optimizing surgical outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal and colorectal surgery. Findings, Definitions, and Analysis of The Postoperative Ileus Management Council (PIMC) National Experts’ Clinical Consensus Panel—Applying Landmark Evidence to Surgical Principles and Practice: Focus on the Natural History of Postoperative Ileus h http://www.clinicalwebcasts.com/pdfs/GenSurg_WEB.pdf . Accessed June 2020
Vather R et al (2013) Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg 17:962–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2148-y
doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2148-y
pubmed: 23377782
Dindo D et al (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
pubmed: 15273542
pmcid: 1360123
Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ (2015) The propensity score. JAMA 314(15):1637–1638. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.13480
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480
pubmed: 26501539
pmcid: 4866501
Van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W et al (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:64–77
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y
Bollo J et al (2020) Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg 107(4):364–372
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11389
Vignali A et al. (2016) Extracorporeal vs. intracorporeal Ileocolic stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic right colectomy: an interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 26(5):343–348Vather R et al. (2013) Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg 17:962–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2148-y
Milone M et al (2018) Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:1–10
doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1645-y
Magistro C et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27:2613–2618
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2799-5
Milone M et al (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29:2314–2320
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7
Mari GM et al (2018) Intracorporeal anastomosis reduces surgical stress response in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28(2):77–81
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000506
Fabozzi M et al (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0902-8
Creavin B et al (2021) Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 36(4):645–656
doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03807-4
Samia H et al (2013) Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline? Am J Surg 205:264–267
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.006
Roscio F et al (2012) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg 10:290–295
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020
Vergis AS et al (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 58:63–68
doi: 10.1503/cjs.001914
Trastulli S et al (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29:1512–1521
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3835-9
Celio D et al (2019) ERAS, length of stay and private insurance: a retrospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(11):1865–1870
doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03391-2
Ricci C et al (2017) A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402:417–427
doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x
Emile SH et al (2019) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 23(11):1023–1035
doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02079-7