Cryo-EM structure of a type IV secretion system.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
19
04
2021
accepted:
11
05
2022
pubmed:
23
6
2022
medline:
9
7
2022
entrez:
22
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bacterial conjugation is the fundamental process of unidirectional transfer of DNAs, often plasmid DNAs, from a donor cell to a recipient cell
Identifiants
pubmed: 35732732
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04859-y
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-04859-y
pmc: PMC9259494
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Type IV Secretion Systems
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
191-196Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P41 GM103533
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 202679/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 206166/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 098302
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 217089
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Waksman, G. From conjugation to T4S systems in Gram-negative bacteria: a mechanistic biology perspective. EMBO Rep. 20, e47012 (2019).
pubmed: 30602585
pmcid: 6362355
doi: 10.15252/embr.201847012
Virolle, C., Goldlust, K., Djermoun, S., Bigot, S. & Lesterlin, C. Plasmid transfer by conjugation in Gram-negative bacteria: from the cellular to the community level. Genes 11, 1239 (2020).
pmcid: 7690428
doi: 10.3390/genes11111239
Barlow, M. What antimicrobial resistance has taught us about horizontal gene transfer. Methods Mol. Biol. 532, 397–411 (2009).
pubmed: 19271198
doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_23
Costa, T. R. et al. Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: structural and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 343–359 (2015).
pubmed: 25978706
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3456
Costa, T. R. D. et al. Type IV secretion systems: advances in structure, function, and activation. Mol. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14670 (2020).
Chandran Darbari, V. & Waksman, G. Structural biology of bacterial type IV secretion systems. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 603–629 (2015).
pubmed: 26034891
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062911-102821
Fronzes, R. et al. Structure of a type IV secretion system core complex. Science 323, 266–268 (2009).
pubmed: 19131631
pmcid: 6710095
doi: 10.1126/science.1166101
Low, H. H. et al. Structure of a type IV secretion system. Nature 508, 550–553 (2014).
pubmed: 24670658
pmcid: 3998870
doi: 10.1038/nature13081
Redzej, A. et al. Structure of a VirD4 coupling protein bound to a VirB type IV secretion machinery. EMBO J. 36, 3080–3095 (2017).
pubmed: 28923826
pmcid: 5916273
doi: 10.15252/embj.201796629
Hu, B., Khara, P. & Christie, P. J. Structural bases for F plasmid conjugation and F pilus biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14222–14227 (2019).
pubmed: 31239340
pmcid: 6628675
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904428116
Khara, P., Song, L., Christie, P. J. & Hu, B. In situ visualization of the pKM101-encoded type IV secretion system reveals a highly symmetric ATPase energy center. mBio 12, e0246521 (2021).
pubmed: 34634937
doi: 10.1128/mBio.02465-21
Aly, K. A. & Baron, C. The VirB5 protein localizes to the T-pilus tips in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Microbiology 153, 3766–3775 (2007).
pubmed: 17975085
doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/010462-0
Babic, A., Lindner, A. B., Vulic, M., Stewart, E. J. & Radman, M. Direct visualization of horizontal gene transfer. Science 319, 1533–1536 (2008).
pubmed: 18339941
doi: 10.1126/science.1153498
Lai, E. M., Chesnokova, O., Banta, L. M. & Kado, C. I. Genetic and environmental factors affecting T-pilin export and T-pilus biogenesis in relation to flagellation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Bacteriol. 182, 3705–3716 (2000).
pubmed: 10850985
pmcid: 94541
doi: 10.1128/JB.182.13.3705-3716.2000
Li, Y. G. & Christie, P. J. The Agrobacterium VirB/VirD4 T4SS: mechanism and architecture defined through in vivo mutagenesis and chimeric systems. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 418, 233–260 (2018).
pubmed: 29808338
pmcid: 7011205
Cabezon, E., Ripoll-Rozada, J., Pena, A., de la Cruz, F. & Arechaga, I. Towards an integrated model of bacterial conjugation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 81–95 (2015).
pubmed: 25154632
Huiskonen, J. T. Image processing for cryogenic transmission electron microscopy of symmetry-mismatched complexes. Biosci. Rep. 38, BSR20170203 (2018).
pubmed: 29439140
pmcid: 5857907
doi: 10.1042/BSR20170203
Chetrit, D., Hu, B., Christie, P. J., Roy, C. R. & Liu, J. A unique cytoplasmic ATPase complex defines the Legionella pneumophila type IV secretion channel. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 678–686 (2018).
pubmed: 29784975
pmcid: 5970066
doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0165-z
Yeo, H. J., Yuan, Q., Beck, M. R., Baron, C. & Waksman, G. Structural and functional characterization of the VirB5 protein from the type IV secretion system encoded by the conjugative plasmid pKM101. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15947–15952 (2003).
pubmed: 14673074
pmcid: 307673
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2535211100
Barden, S. et al. A helical RGD motif promoting cell adhesion: crystal structures of the Helicobacter pylori type IV secretion system pilus protein CagL. Structure 21, 1931–1941 (2013).
pubmed: 24076404
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.018
Wu, X. et al. Crystal structure of CagV, the Helicobacter pylori homologue of the T4SS protein VirB8. FEBS J. 286, 4294–4309 (2019).
pubmed: 31230405
doi: 10.1111/febs.14971
Terradot, L. et al. Structures of two core subunits of the bacterial type IV secretion system, VirB8 from Brucella suis and ComB10 from Helicobacter pylori. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4596–4601 (2005).
pubmed: 15764702
pmcid: 555499
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408927102
Chandran, V. et al. Structure of the outer membrane complex of a type IV secretion system. Nature 462, 1011–1015 (2009).
pubmed: 19946264
pmcid: 2797999
doi: 10.1038/nature08588
Sgro, G. S. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the core complex of a bacterial killing type IV secretion system. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 1429–1440 (2018).
pubmed: 30349081
pmcid: 6264810
doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0262-z
Durie, C. L. et al. Structural analysis of the Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm type IV secretion system core complex. eLife 9, e59530 (2020).
pubmed: 32876045
pmcid: 7511231
doi: 10.7554/eLife.59530
Sheedlo, M. J. et al. Cryo-EM reveals species-specific components within the Helicobacter pylori Cag type IV secretion system core complex. eLife 9, e59495 (2020).
pubmed: 32876048
pmcid: 7511236
doi: 10.7554/eLife.59495
Ovchinnikov, S., Kamisetty, H. & Baker, D. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. eLife 3, e02030 (2014).
pubmed: 24842992
pmcid: 4034769
doi: 10.7554/eLife.02030
Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S., Kamisetty, H. & Baker, D. Origins of coevolution between residues distant in protein 3D structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9122–9127 (2017).
pubmed: 28784799
pmcid: 5576787
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702664114
Cong, Q., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S. & Baker, D. Protein interaction networks revealed by proteome coevolution. Science 365, 185–189 (2019).
pubmed: 31296772
pmcid: 6948103
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw6718
Yang, J. et al. Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1496–1503 (2020).
pubmed: 31896580
pmcid: 6983395
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914677117
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
pubmed: 34282049
pmcid: 7612213
doi: 10.1126/science.abj8754
Costa, T. R. D. et al. Structure of the bacterial sex F pilus reveals an assembly of a stoichiometric protein-phospholipid complex. Cell 166, 1436–1444.e1410 (2016).
pubmed: 27610568
pmcid: 5018250
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.025
Kerr, J. E. & Christie, P. J. Evidence for VirB4-mediated dislocation of membrane-integrated VirB2 pilin during biogenesis of the Agrobacterium VirB/VirD4 type IV secretion system. J. Bacteriol. 192, 4923–4934 (2010).
pubmed: 20656905
pmcid: 2944537
doi: 10.1128/JB.00557-10
Sagulenko, E., Sagulenko, V., Chen, J. & Christie, P. J. Role of Agrobacterium VirB11 ATPase in T-pilus assembly and substrate selection. J. Bacteriol. 183, 5813–5825 (2001).
pubmed: 11566978
pmcid: 99657
doi: 10.1128/JB.183.20.5813-5825.2001
Park, D., Chetrit, D., Hu, B., Roy, C. R. & Liu, J. Analysis of Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system subassemblies by cryoelectron tomography reveals conformational changes induced by DotB binding. mBio 11, e03328–19 (2020).
pubmed: 32071271
pmcid: 7029142
doi: 10.1128/mBio.03328-19
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
pubmed: 34265844
pmcid: 8371605
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Yeo, H. J., Savvides, S. N., Herr, A. B., Lanka, E. & Waksman, G. Crystal structure of the hexameric traffic ATPase of the Helicobacter pylori type IV secretion system. Mol. Cell 6, 1461–1472 (2000).
pubmed: 11163218
doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00142-8
Hare, S., Bayliss, R., Baron, C. & Waksman, G. A large domain swap in the VirB11 ATPase of Brucella suis leaves the hexameric assembly intact. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 56–66 (2006).
pubmed: 16730027
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.060
Wallden, K. et al. Structure of the VirB4 ATPase, alone and bound to the core complex of a type IV secretion system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11348–11353 (2012).
pubmed: 22745169
pmcid: 3396474
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201428109
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R. & Wolfson, H. J. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W363–W367 (2005).
pubmed: 15980490
pmcid: 1160241
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki481
Thomason, L. C., Costantino, N., Shaw, D. V. & Court, D. L. Multicopy plasmid modification with phage lambda Red recombineering. Plasmid 58, 148–158 (2007).
pubmed: 17434584
pmcid: 2706537
doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.03.001
Sharan, S. K., Thomason, L. C., Kuznetsov, S. G. & Court, D. L. Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat. Protoc. 4, 206–223 (2009).
pubmed: 19180090
pmcid: 2790811
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.227
Warming, S., Costantino, N., Court, D. L., Jenkins, N. A. & Copeland, N. G. Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e36 (2005).
pubmed: 15731329
pmcid: 549575
doi: 10.1093/nar/gni035
Trokter, M., Felisberto-Rodrigues, C., Christie, P. J. & Waksman, G. Recent advances in the structural and molecular biology of type IV secretion systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 27, 16–23 (2014).
pubmed: 24709394
pmcid: 4182333
doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.02.006
Cheng, K., Wilkinson, M., Chaban, Y. & Wigley, D. B. A conformational switch in response to Chi converts RecBCD from phage destruction to DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 71–77 (2020).
pubmed: 31907455
pmcid: 7000243
doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0355-2
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466
pmcid: 5494038
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
pubmed: 26278980
pmcid: 6760662
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008
Zhang, K. Fully Automatic Acccurate, Convenient and Extremely Fast Particle Picking for EM https://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gautomatch/ (2017).
Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).
pubmed: 33257830
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
pubmed: 22743772
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
van Heel, M., Harauz, G., Orlova, E. V., Schmidt, R. & Schatz, M. A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 17–24 (1996).
pubmed: 8742718
doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0004
Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
pubmed: 23000701
pmcid: 3690530
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
pubmed: 20124702
pmcid: 2815670
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925
Kim, D. E., Chivian, D. & Baker, D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W526–W531 (2004).
pubmed: 15215442
pmcid: 441606
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh468
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
pubmed: 32881101
doi: 10.1002/pro.3943
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
pubmed: 15572765
doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158
McGuffin, L. J., Bryson, K. & Jones, D. T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16, 404–405 (2000).
pubmed: 10869041
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.404
Hofmann, K. & Stoffel, W. TMbase—a database of membrane spanning proteins segments. Biol. Chem. 347, 166 (1993).
Davis, I. W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375–W383 (2007).
pubmed: 17452350
pmcid: 1933162
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm216
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 (2015).
pubmed: 25950237
pmcid: 5298202
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053
Song, Y. et al. High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21, 1735–1742 (2013).
pubmed: 24035711
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.005
Mougous, J. D. et al. A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312, 1526–1530 (2006).
pubmed: 16763151
pmcid: 2800167
doi: 10.1126/science.1128393
Yan, Y., Tao, H., He, J. & Huang, S. Y. The HDOCK server for integrated protein-protein docking. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1829–1852 (2020).
pubmed: 32269383
doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0312-x
Krieger, E. et al. Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8. Proteins 77, 114–122 (2009).
pubmed: 19768677
pmcid: 2922016
doi: 10.1002/prot.22570
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007).
pubmed: 17681537
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022
PyMOL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 2.0 (Schrödinger).
Eddy, S. R. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform. 23, 205–211 (2009).
pubmed: 20180275
Peng, W., de Souza Santos, M., Li, Y., Tomchick, D. R. & Orth, K. High-resolution cryo-EM structures of the E. coli hemolysin ClyA oligomers. PLoS ONE 14, e0213423 (2019).
pubmed: 31048915
pmcid: 6497250
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213423
Holm, L. DALI and the persistence of protein shape. Protein Sci. 29, 128–140 (2020).
pubmed: 31606894
doi: 10.1002/pro.3749
Terradot, L. et al. Biochemical characterization of protein complexes from the Helicobacter pylori protein interaction map: strategies for complex formation and evidence for novel interactions within type IV secretion systems. Mol. Cell Proteomics 3, 809–819 (2004).
pubmed: 15133060
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M400048-MCP200
Mary, C., Fouillen, A., Bessette, B., Nanci, A. & Baron, C. Interaction via the N terminus of the type IV secretion system (T4SS) protein VirB6 with VirB10 is required for VirB2 and VirB5 incorporation into T-pili and for T4SS function. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 13415–13426 (2018).
pubmed: 29976757
pmcid: 6120205
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002751
Sharifahmadian, M., Nlend, I. U., Lecoq, L., Omichinski, J. G. & Baron, C. The type IV secretion system core component VirB8 interacts via the β1-strand with VirB10. FEBS Lett. 591, 2491–2500 (2017).
pubmed: 28766702
doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12770
Kufareva, I. & Abagyan, R. Methods of protein structure comparison. Methods Mol. Biol. 857, 231–257 (2012).
pubmed: 22323224
pmcid: 4321859
doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_10
Jayashree, S., Murugavel, P., Sowdhamini, R. & Srinivasan, N. Interface residues of transient protein–protein complexes have extensive intra-protein interactions apart from inter-protein interactions. Biol. Direct 14, 1 (2019).
pubmed: 30646935
pmcid: 6334431
doi: 10.1186/s13062-019-0232-2
Mintseris, J. & Weng, Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10930–10935 (2005).
pubmed: 16043700
pmcid: 1182425
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502667102