Determination of Patient Adherence for Duloxetine in Urine.


Journal

Journal of analytical toxicology
ISSN: 1945-2403
Titre abrégé: J Anal Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7705085

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 01 03 2022
revised: 19 05 2022
accepted: 23 06 2022
pubmed: 25 6 2022
medline: 19 10 2022
entrez: 24 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Duloxetine, known by its brand name, CymbaltaTM, is a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor used to treat major depressive disorders. Determination of patient compliance for duloxetine is typically determined through medication possession ratio (MPR) or plasma concentrations. The purpose of this paper was to characterize normal urinary duloxetine concentrations in patients prescribed duloxetine to monitor patient adherence. Patient data collected from routine screens for duloxetine concentrations in urine were included in this study. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who were prescribed duloxetine and (i) tested positive for duloxetine, (ii) tested negative for illicit substances and (iii) included creatinine, age and duloxetine dose administered. Of the 5,592 patient urines screened, 2,004 of the results fit into the inclusion criteria. Positive urine concentrations of duloxetine ranged from 50 to 2,722 ng/mL. Duloxetine urine concentrations were normalized to creatinine and dose further characterized by sex, age, body mass index (BMI) and dose in milligrams. Sample distribution included urines collected from 1,487 females and 517 males. The age range of the specimen donors was between 15 and 90 years old with an average age of 52. BMI levels ranged from 13.9 (underweight) to 88.1 (obese), with the average BMI being 33.5. The most common dose of duloxetine prescribed was a daily, oral dose of 60 mg. Analysis of the normalized, transformed creatinine concentrations showed that there was a significant statistical difference (P < 0.05) in the urinary duloxetine concentrations by sex and by dose (mg). Female patients further showed a statistical difference in urinary duloxetine concentration in age groups 18-64 and 64 and older. By characterizing urinary duloxetine concentrations in patients prescribed the medication, normalized distributions of data ranges have been established. These data ranges for urinary duloxetine concentrations can be used to determine patient compliance with duloxetine in routine, clinical samples.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35748596
pii: 6617328
doi: 10.1093/jat/bkac043
pmc: PMC9564183
doi:

Substances chimiques

Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors 0
Thiophenes 0
Serotonin 333DO1RDJY
Duloxetine Hydrochloride 9044SC542W
Creatinine AYI8EX34EU
Norepinephrine X4W3ENH1CV

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

905-910

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : P30 DA033934
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30DA033934
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(4 Pt 2):385-9
pubmed: 18609436
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Jan;234:165-73
pubmed: 24378318
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Nov;12(10):1431-2
pubmed: 19656434
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Jan 15;174(1):40-6
pubmed: 17467213
J Anal Toxicol. 2015 Oct;39(8):662-7
pubmed: 26378142
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jan;57(1):54-61
pubmed: 14678340
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011 May;50(5):281-94
pubmed: 21366359
J Forensic Leg Med. 2010 May;17(4):175-85
pubmed: 20382351
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2021 Feb 3;7(1):6
pubmed: 33531089
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Feb 11;6:75-81
pubmed: 24596469
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020 Dec;58(12):1360-1541
pubmed: 33305966
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2009 Sep;42(5):189-93
pubmed: 19724981
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Nov;25(6):315-22
pubmed: 20706125
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(3):189-97
pubmed: 19385712
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019 Jun;15(2):258-261
pubmed: 30796754
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 May;26(3):173-80
pubmed: 21278576
Value Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):44-7
pubmed: 18237359
J Anal Toxicol. 2016 Mar;40(2):167-70
pubmed: 26662354
Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(12):1475-93
pubmed: 15892657
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Dec;59(12):1282-1501
pubmed: 34890263

Auteurs

Haley A Mulder (HA)

Department of Pharmaceutics, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1112 East Clay Street, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.

Greg L McIntire (GL)

Ameritox LLC, Research and Development Department, 486 Gallimore Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA.

Frank N Wallace (FN)

Ameritox LLC, Research and Development Department, 486 Gallimore Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA.

Justin L Poklis (JL)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1112 East Clay Street, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH