Does epilepsy contribute to the clinical phenotype of C9orf72 mutation in fronto-temporal dementia?
C9orf72 mutation
Epilepsy
Fronto-temporal dementia
Progressive primary aphasia
Journal
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
ISSN: 1525-5069
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
06
03
2022
revised:
17
05
2022
accepted:
30
05
2022
pubmed:
26
6
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
entrez:
25
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
C9orf72 mutation is the most common genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) worldwide. Recently, several reports of patients with FTD who carried the C9orf72 mutation and also manifested epilepsy have been published, since seizures occur in FTD at a higher rate than in the general population, the possible association between epilepsy and C9orf72 mutation remains to be clarified. In the attempt to understand whether epilepsy contributes to the phenotype of the C9orf72 mutation, we compared epilepsy occurrence in patients with FTD who carried the C9orf72 mutation and those who did not. In our sample of 84 patients with FTD, 7.1% of cases reported epilepsy, with no significant differences between subsamples of patients with FTD stratified according to the presence of the C9orf72 mutation or to family history of FTD/parkinsonism/motor neuron disease. Our findings did not support to the possibility that epilepsy represents a characteristic feature of the C9orf72 mutation, as suggested by recent case reports published in the English literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35752055
pii: S1525-5050(22)00232-3
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108783
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
C9orf72 Protein
0
C9orf72 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108783Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.