Making implementation science more real.
Context
Implementation science
Mechanism
Outcome
Realist evaluation
Realist review
Realist synthesis
Theory
Journal
BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 06 2022
25 06 2022
Historique:
received:
16
02
2022
accepted:
13
06
2022
entrez:
25
6
2022
pubmed:
26
6
2022
medline:
29
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Implementation science in healthcare aims to understand how to get evidence into practice. Once this is achieved in one setting, it becomes increasingly difficult to replicate elsewhere. The problem is often attributed to differences in context that influence how and whether implementation strategies work. We argue that realist research paradigms provide a useful framework to express the effect of contextual factors within implementation strategy causal processes. Realist studies are theory-driven evaluations that focus on understanding how and why interventions work under different circumstances. They consider the interaction between contextual circumstances, theoretical mechanisms of change and the outcomes they produce, to arrive at explanations of conditional causality (i.e., what tends to work, for whom, under what circumstances). This Commentary provides example applications using preliminary findings from a large realist implementation study of system-wide value-based healthcare initiatives in New South Wales, Australia. If applied judiciously, realist implementation studies may represent a sound approach to help optimise delivery of the right care in the right setting and at the right time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35752754
doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01661-2
pii: 10.1186/s12874-022-01661-2
pmc: PMC9233332
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
178Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 04;6(4):e009977
pubmed: 27044575
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1:i18-23
pubmed: 21450764
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e044049
pubmed: 33371049
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 30;16(1):63
pubmed: 29706132
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Jan 01;2:
pubmed: 34541541
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Oct;22(5):792-8
pubmed: 27291891
BMJ. 2019 May 10;365:l2068
pubmed: 31076440
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):1032-1038
pubmed: 30623387
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):191-197
pubmed: 29401020
BMC Med. 2019 May 7;17(1):88
pubmed: 31064388
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):714-7
pubmed: 24740239
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141
pubmed: 27756414
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 11;14(1):103
pubmed: 31823787
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 26;2(1):45
pubmed: 33902748
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 20;6:24
pubmed: 21418604
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 20;8:70
pubmed: 23786847
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):604-10
pubmed: 21493589
Med J Aust. 2020 Feb;212(3):104-106.e1
pubmed: 31909479
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:226-35; discussion 235-7
pubmed: 8192299
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):110-23
pubmed: 22996571
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1561-3
pubmed: 15217878
Front Public Health. 2018 May 07;6:136
pubmed: 29868544
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):177-179
pubmed: 30429207
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96
pubmed: 27342217
BMJ. 2017 Jan 27;356:j437
pubmed: 28130219
Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 05;9:115
pubmed: 25190100
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):228-38
pubmed: 25616279
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;44(2):177-194
pubmed: 26289563
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 26;14(1):40
pubmed: 31027495
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 16;10:49
pubmed: 25885787
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:361-372
pubmed: 30633712
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 19;7:33
pubmed: 22515663