Accelerating and improving radiochromic film calibration by utilizing the dose ratio in photon and proton beams.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
revised: 08 06 2022
received: 06 12 2021
accepted: 09 06 2022
pubmed: 28 6 2022
medline: 15 9 2022
entrez: 27 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Radiochromic films are versatile 2D dosimeters with high-resolution and near tissue equivalence. To assure high precision and accuracy, a time-consuming calibration process is required. To improve the time efficiency, a novel calibration method utilizing the ratio of the same dose profile measured at different monitor units (MUs) is introduced and tested in a proton and photon beam. The calibration procedure employs the dose ratio of film measurements of the same relative profile for different absolute dose values. Hence, the ratio of the dose is constant at any point of the profile, but the ratio of the net optical densities is not constant. The key idea of the method is to optimize the calibration function until the ratio of the calculated doses is constant. The proposed method was tested in the dose range between 0.25-12 and 1-6 Gy in a proton and photon beam, respectively. A radial symmetric profile and a rectangular profile were created, both having a central plateau region of about 3 cm diameter and a dose falloff of about 1.5 cm at larger distances. The dose falloff region was used as input for the optimization method and the central plateau region served as dose reference points. Only the plateau region of the highest dose entered the optimization as an additional objective. The measured data were randomly split into differently sized training and test sets. The optimization was repeated 1000 times with random start value initialization using the same start values for the standard and the gradient method. Finally, a proton plan with four dose levels was created, which were separated spatially, to test the possibility of a full calibration within a single measurement. Parameter estimation was possible with as low as one dose ratio used for optimization in both the photon and the proton case, yet exhibiting a high sensitivity on the dose level. The root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of the dose was less than 1% when the dose ratio was in the order of 20, whereas the median RMSD of all optimizations was 1.7%. Using four dose levels for optimization resulted in a median RMSD of 1% when randomly selecting the dose levels. Having at least one dose ratio of about 20 included in the optimization considerably improved the RMSD of the calibration function. Using six or eight dose levels reduced the sensitivity on the dose level selection and the median RMSD was 0.8%. A full calibration was possible in a single measurement having four dose levels in one plan but spatially separated. The number of measurements required to obtain an EBT3 film calibration function could be reduced using the proposed dose ratio method while maintaining the same accuracy as with the standard method.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35754376
doi: 10.1002/mp.15828
pmc: PMC9543697
doi:

Substances chimiques

Protons 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6150-6160

Subventions

Organisme : Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (FFG)
ID : 874709

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Phys Med Biol. 2010 May 21;55(10):N281-90
pubmed: 20427857
Med Phys. 2021 May;48(5):2592-2603
pubmed: 33525060
Med Phys. 2016 Nov;43(11):5835
pubmed: 27806608
Phys Med Biol. 2015 May 21;60(10):4089-104
pubmed: 25928128
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):2289-2299
pubmed: 32166764
Med Phys. 2022 Sep;49(9):6150-6160
pubmed: 35754376
Z Med Phys. 2021 May;31(2):154-165
pubmed: 32747175
Z Med Phys. 2014 May;24(2):153-63
pubmed: 24055395
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Mar 07;64(5):055015
pubmed: 30673655
Med Phys. 2015 Jan;42(1):221-31
pubmed: 25563262
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):e1123-e1145
pubmed: 30247757
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 08;16(2):5141
pubmed: 26103181
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):011720
pubmed: 23298090
Z Med Phys. 2018 Aug;28(3):196-210
pubmed: 29107440
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 08;17(5):466-481
pubmed: 27685125
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Nov 7;61(21):7704-7724
pubmed: 27740945
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Mar 15;63(6):065007
pubmed: 29474189
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jan 21;61(2):625-49
pubmed: 26689962
Med Phys. 2019 Apr;46(4):1896-1904
pubmed: 30715736
Phys Med. 2020 Mar;71:115-123
pubmed: 32126519
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Feb 27;64(5):05NT01
pubmed: 30625437
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2444-2456
pubmed: 30870583
Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):1931-46
pubmed: 19610282

Auteurs

Andreas F Resch (AF)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Fatima Padilla Cabal (F)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Milovan Regodic (M)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Wolfgang Lechner (W)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Gerd Heilemann (G)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Peter Kuess (P)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Dietmar Georg (D)

Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Hugo Palmans (H)

MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Medical Radiation Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

Adult Aged Female Humans Male
Humans Pancreatic Neoplasms Proton Therapy Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Humans Proton Therapy Lung Neoplasms Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Classifications MeSH