Impact of DNA Geometry and Scoring on Monte Carlo Track-Structure Simulations of Initial Radiation-Induced Damage.


Journal

Radiation research
ISSN: 1938-5404
Titre abrégé: Radiat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401245

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2022
Historique:
received: 15 09 2021
accepted: 07 06 2022
pubmed: 30 6 2022
medline: 11 9 2022
entrez: 29 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Track structure Monte Carlo simulations are a useful tool to investigate the damage induced to DNA by ionizing radiation. These simulations usually rely on simplified geometrical representations of the DNA subcomponents. DNA damage is determined by the physical and physicochemical processes occurring within these volumes. In particular, damage to the DNA backbone is generally assumed to result in strand breaks. DNA damage can be categorized as direct (ionization of an atom part of the DNA molecule) or indirect (damage from reactive chemical species following water radiolysis). We also consider quasi-direct effects, i.e., damage originated by charge transfers after ionization of the hydration shell surrounding the DNA. DNA geometries are needed to account for the damage induced by ionizing radiation, and different geometry models can be used for speed or accuracy reasons. In this work, we use the Monte Carlo track structure tool TOPAS-nBio, built on top of Geant4-DNA, for simulation at the nanometer scale to evaluate differences among three DNA geometrical models in an entire cell nucleus, including a sphere/spheroid model specifically designed for this work. In addition to strand breaks, we explicitly consider the direct, quasi-direct, and indirect damage induced to DNA base moieties. We use results from the literature to determine the best values for the relevant parameters. For example, the proportion of hydroxyl radical reactions between base moieties was 80%, and between backbone, moieties was 20%, the proportion of radical attacks leading to a strand break was 11%, and the expected ratio of base damages and strand breaks was 2.5-3. Our results show that failure to update parameters for new geometric models can lead to significant differences in predicted damage yields.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35767729
pii: 483455
doi: 10.1667/RADE-21-00179.1
pmc: PMC9458623
mid: NIHMS1826000
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA 9007-49-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

207-220

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K99 CA267560
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA187003
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©2022 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Références

Int J Radiat Biol. 1997 May;71(5):467-83
pubmed: 9191891
Radiat Res. 2017 Dec;188(6):690-703
pubmed: 28792846
Radiat Res. 2000 Aug;154(2):163-70
pubmed: 10931688
Phys Med. 2015 Dec;31(8):861-874
pubmed: 26653251
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2000;65:377-82
pubmed: 12760053
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2654
pubmed: 29422642
Med Phys. 2009 Feb;36(2):620-5
pubmed: 19292002
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1501-1511
pubmed: 30689203
Science. 1981 Aug 21;213(4510):896-8
pubmed: 7256283
Radiat Res. 2020 Oct 2;194(4):351-362
pubmed: 32857855
Phys Med. 2020 Apr;72:114-121
pubmed: 32247964
Radiat Res. 2006 Jul;166(1 Pt 1):1-8
pubmed: 16808596
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Sep 03;66(17):
pubmed: 34412044
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;10(1):20788
pubmed: 33247225
Radiat Res. 1993 Feb;133(2):151-7
pubmed: 8382368
Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Sep;58(3):397-415
pubmed: 1975603
Int J Radiat Biol. 1991 Nov;60(5):739-56
pubmed: 1680946
Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Jun;57(6):1141-50
pubmed: 1971840
Mutat Res. 2011 Jun 3;711(1-2):28-40
pubmed: 21281649
Int J Radiat Biol. 1996 Jun;69(6):739-55
pubmed: 8691026
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 18;95(17):9738-43
pubmed: 9707545
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Mar;101(3):265-70
pubmed: 21232812
J Radiat Res. 2006 Mar;47(1):69-81
pubmed: 16571920
Radiat Res. 2020 Oct 2;194(4):403-410
pubmed: 33045091
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 29;11:689112
pubmed: 34268120
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Jul 30;66(15):
pubmed: 34280910
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1997 Jun;36(2):105-16
pubmed: 9271798
Radiat Res. 2011 Jan;175(1):97-112
pubmed: 21175352
Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 17;63(10):105014
pubmed: 29697057
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 29901835
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Sep;41(16):7589-605
pubmed: 23804754
Phys Med. 2018 Apr;48:146-155
pubmed: 29371062
Radiat Res. 2020 Jul 8;194(1):9-21
pubmed: 32401689
Radiat Res. 2002 Jan;157(1):38-44
pubmed: 11754640
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):11923
pubmed: 28931851
RSC Adv. 2019 Feb 28;9(12):6845-6858
pubmed: 35518487
Br J Radiol. 2014 Aug;87(1040):20140293
pubmed: 24896200
Radiat Res. 1987 Sep;111(3):385-405
pubmed: 3659275
Radiat Res. 1996 Mar;145(3):304-14
pubmed: 8927698
Radiat Res. 2019 Jan;191(1):76-92
pubmed: 30407901
Radiat Res. 2004 Apr;161(4):451-7
pubmed: 15038766
Phys Med. 2019 Jun;62:152-157
pubmed: 31109825
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1997 Feb;36(1):59-66
pubmed: 9128899
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jan 7;53(1):233-44
pubmed: 18182699
Science. 2000 Mar 3;287(5458):1658-60
pubmed: 10698742
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1988 Mar;53(3):353-65
pubmed: 3257951
Radiat Res. 2019 Feb;191(2):125-138
pubmed: 30609382
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Mar 26;63(7):075007
pubmed: 29508768
Phys Med. 2018 Apr;48:135-145
pubmed: 29628360
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;14(3):
pubmed: 35158731
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Apr 23;65(8):085015
pubmed: 32101803
Radiat Res. 2003 Mar;159(3):401-10
pubmed: 12600243
Phys Med. 2018 Jul;51:108-116
pubmed: 29908994
DNA Repair (Amst). 2020 Jan;85:102743
pubmed: 31759308
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1999 May;38(1):31-8
pubmed: 10384953
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 25;10(1):15775
pubmed: 32978459
Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1988;35:95-125
pubmed: 3065826
Phys Med. 2016 Oct;32(10):1187-1200
pubmed: 27659007
Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S103-11
pubmed: 3867077

Auteurs

Alejandro Bertolet (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

José Ramos-Méndez (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Aimee McNamara (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Dohyeon Yoo (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Samuel Ingram (S)

Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Nicholas Henthorn (N)

Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

John-William Warmenhoven (JW)

Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Bruce Faddegon (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Michael Merchant (M)

Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Stephen J McMahon (SJ)

Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Harald Paganetti (H)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Jan Schuemann (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Humans Algorithms Software Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Clinical Competence Male Female

A computational model for bacteriophage ϕX174 gene expression.

Alexis M Hill, Tanvi A Ingle, Claus O Wilke
1.00
Gene Expression Regulation, Viral Promoter Regions, Genetic Bacteriophage phi X 174 Computer Simulation Models, Genetic

Classifications MeSH