The impact of vaginal pH on induction of labour outcomes: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Vaginal pH
acetic acid
dinoprostone
meta-analysis
misoprostol
Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
ISSN: 1364-6893
Titre abrégé: J Obstet Gynaecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
6
1
2023
entrez:
1
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present meta-analysis evaluates the impact of an acidic vaginal pH on the progress of labour induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol. We searched Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies. Meta-analysis was performed with Rstudio using the meta function and trial sequential analysis was used to evaluate the adequacy of sample size. Nine studies were retrieved that involved 809 patients. An acidic vaginal pH did not influence the efficacy of misoprostol or dinoprostone in terms of accomplishing a successful vaginal delivery (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.29, 1.30). The interval to delivery was unaffected by the acidity of vaginal pH (Mean Difference 4.18 h, 95% CI -2.09, 10.45). In conclusion, vaginal pH does not seem to affect the potency of vaginally administered prostaglandins; therefore, moistening of vaginal tables with acetic acid does not seem reasonable until further evidence becomes available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35775477
doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2091433
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dinoprostone
K7Q1JQR04M
Misoprostol
0E43V0BB57
Oxytocics
0
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM