Key challenges for in vitro testing of tobacco products for regulatory applications: Recommendations for dosimetry.
aerosol
dosimetry
next-generation products (NGPs)
smoke
Journal
Drug testing and analysis
ISSN: 1942-7611
Titre abrégé: Drug Test Anal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101483449
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
revised:
02
07
2022
received:
18
03
2022
accepted:
05
07
2022
pmc-release:
13
01
2024
medline:
8
11
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2022
entrez:
13
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) is sponsoring a series of workshops to develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays to assess potential toxicity within and across tobacco and various next-generation products (NGPs) including heated tobacco products (HTPs) and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs). This publication was developed by a working group of the workshop members in conjunction with the sixth workshop in that series entitled "Dosimetry for conducting in vitro evaluations" and focuses on aerosol dosimetry for aerosol exposure to combustible cigarettes, HTP, and ENDS aerosolized tobacco products and summarizes the key challenges as well as documenting areas for future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35830202
doi: 10.1002/dta.3344
pmc: PMC9897201
mid: NIHMS1865971
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aerosols
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1175-1188Subventions
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : R13 FD007386
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : 1R13D007386
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : 1R13D007386
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 JT International SA and The Authors. Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Labiris NR, Dolovich MB. Pulmonary drug delivery. Part I: physiological factors affecting therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):588-599. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01892.x. PMID: 14616418; PMCID: PMC1884307.
Alexander DJ, Collins CJ, Coombs DW, et al. Association of Inhalation Toxicologists (AIT) working party recommendation for standard delivered dose calculation and expression in non-clinical aerosol inhalation toxicology studies with pharmaceuticals. Inhal Toxicol. 2008;20(13):1179-1189. doi:10.1080/08958370802207318. PMID: 18802802.
Kolli AR, Kuczaj AK, Martin F, Hayes AW, Peitsch MC, Hoeng J. Bridging inhaled aerosol dosimetry to physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for toxicological assessment: nicotine delivery systems and beyond. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2019;49(9):725-741. doi:10.1080/10408444.2019.1692780
Amaral SS, De Carvalho JA, Costa MAM, Pinheiro C. An overview of particulate matter measurement instruments. Atmos. 2015;6(9):1327-1345. doi:10.3390/atmos6091327
Wieczorek R, Trelles Sticken E, Bode LM, Simms L. Dosimetry: TPM and nicotine delivery of combusted tobacco products to the 24 and 96 Multi Well Plate and inserts on Smoke Aerosol Exposure In vitro System (SAEIVS) poster. 2017. https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/abstracts/2017_STPOST22_Wieczorek.pdf
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health. 2012. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r8_en.pdf/e153243a-03f0-44c5-8808-88af66223258?t=1353935239897
Marano KM, Liu C, Fuller W, Gentry PR. Quantitative risk assessment of tobacco products: a potentially useful component of substantial equivalence evaluations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2018;95:371-384. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Mar 31. PMID: 29614342.
Casey WM, Chang X, Allen DG, et al. Evaluation and optimization of pharmacokinetic models for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of estrogenic activity for environmental chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(9):097001. doi:10.1289/EHP1655. PMID: 30192161; PMCID: PMC6375436.
Yoon M, Campbell JL, Andersen ME, Clewell HJ. Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of cell-based toxicity assay results. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012;42(8):633-652. doi:10.3109/10408444.2012.692115. PMID: Epub 2012 Jun 6. PMID: 22667820.
Bell SM, Chang X, Wambaugh JF, et al. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making. Toxicol In Vitro. 2018;47:213-227. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.016. PMID: Epub 2017 Dec 5. PMID: 29203341; PMCID: PMC7393693.
Chang X, Abedini J, Bell S, Lee KM. Exploring in vitro to in vivo extrapolation for exposure and health impacts of e-cigarette flavor mixtures. Toxicol In Vitro. 2021;72:105090, ISSN 0887-2333. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105090
Zhang J, Chang X, Holland TL, et al. Evaluation of inhalation exposures and potential health impacts of ingredient mixtures using in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. Front Toxicol. 2022;3:787756. doi:10.3389/ftox.2021.787756
Hines DE, Bell S, Chang X, Mansouri K, Allen D, Kleinstreuer N. Application of an accessible interface for pharmacokinetic modeling and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:864742. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.864742
Escher BI, Hermens JL. Internal exposure: linking bioavailability to effects. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(23):455a-462a. doi:10.1021/es0406740
Paustenbach DJ. The practice of exposure assessment: a state-of-the-art review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev, 2000;3(3):179-291. doi:10.1080/10937400050045264. PMID: 10911984.
Proença S, Escher BI, Fischer FC, et al. Effective exposure of chemicals in in vitro cell systems: a review of chemical distribution models. Toxicol In Vitro. 2021;73:105133, ISSN 0887-2333. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105133
Hinderliter PM, Minard KR, Orr G, et al. ISDD: a computational model of particle sedimentation, diffusion and target cell dosimetry for in vitro toxicity studies. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;7(1):36. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-36. PMID: 21118529; PMCID: PMC3012653.
Teeguarden JG, Hinderliter PM, Orr G, Thrall BD, Pounds JG. Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments. Toxicol Sci. 2007;95(2):300-312. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfl165 PMID: Epub 2006 Nov 10. Erratum in: Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jun;97(2):614. PMID: 17098817.
Armitage JM, Wania F, Arnot JA. Application of mass balance models and the chemical activity concept to facilitate the use of in vitro toxicity data for risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(16):9770-9779. doi:10.1021/es501955g
Endo S, Goss KU. Serum albumin binding of structurally diverse neutral organic compounds: data and models. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24(12):2293-2301. doi:10.1021/tx200431b
Chapman FM, Sparham C, Hastie C, et al. Comparison of passive-dosed and solvent spiked exposures of pro-carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene, to human lymphoblastoid cell line, MCL-5. Toxicol In Vitro. 2020;67:104905. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104905
Groothuis FA, Heringa MB, Nicol B, Hermens JL, Blaauboer BJ, Kramer NI. Dose metric considerations in in vitro assays to improve quantitative in vitro-in vivo dose extrapolations. Toxicology. 2015;332:30-40. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2013.08.012. PMID: Epub 2013 Aug 23. PMID: 23978460.
Upadhyay S, Palmberg L. Air-liquid interface: relevant in vitro models for investigating air pollutant-induced pulmonary toxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2018;164(1):21-30. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfy053. PMID: 29534242.
Gindele JA, Kiechle T, Benediktus K, et al. Intermittent exposure to whole cigarette smoke alters the differentiation of primary small airway epithelial cells in the air-liquid interface culture. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6257 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63345-5. PMID: 32277131; PMCID: PMC7148343.
Mathis C, Poussin C, Weisensee D, et al. Human bronchial epithelial cells exposed in vitro to cigarette smoke at the air-liquid interface resemble bronchial epithelium from human smokers. Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys. 2013;304(7):L489-L503. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00181.2012. PMID: Epub 2013 Jan 25. PMID: 23355383; PMCID: PMC3627940.
Cao X, Coyle JP, Xiong R, et al. Invited review: human air-liquid-interface organotypic airway tissue models derived from primary tracheobronchial epithelial cells-overview and perspectives. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2021;57(2):104-132. doi:10.1007/s11626-020-00517-7 PMID: Epub 2020 Nov 11. PMID: 33175307; PMCID: PMC7657088.
Bishop E, Terry A, East N, Breheny D, Gaça M, Thorne D. A 3D in vitro comparison of two undiluted e-cigarette aerosol generating systems. Toxicol Lett. 2022;358:69-79, ISSN 0378-4274. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.01.002
Klus H, Boenke-Nimphius B, Müller L. Cigarette mainstream smoke: the evolution of methods and devices for generation, exposure and collection. Beiträge Zur Tabakforschung International/Contributions to Tobacco Research. 2016;27(4):137-274. doi:10.1515/cttr-2016-0015
Baker RR, Bishop LJ. The pyrolysis of tobacco ingredients. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2004;71(1):223-311.
Jenkins RA, Gill BE. Determination of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) in cigarette smoke by chemiluminescent analysis. Anal Chem. 1980;52(6):925-928. doi:10.1021/ac50056a035
Boué S, Goedertier D, Hoeng J, et al. State-of-the-art methods and devices for generation, exposure, and collection of aerosols from e-vapor products. Toxicol Res Appl. 2020;4:1-32. doi:10.1177/2397847320979751
Boué S, Goedertier D, Hoeng J, et al. State-of-the-art methods and devices for the generation, exposure, and collection of aerosols from heat-not-burn tobacco products. Toxicol Res Appl. 2020;4:2397847319897869.
Margham J, McAdam K, Forster M, et al. Chemical composition of aerosol from an e-cigarette: a quantitative comparison with cigarette smoke. Chem Res Toxicol 2016;29(10):1662-1678. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00188. Epub 2016 Sep 18. PMID: 27641760.
Margham J, McAdam K, Cunningham A, et al. The chemical complexity of e-cigarette aerosols compared with the smoke from a tobacco burning cigarette. Front Chem. 2021;9, ISSN 2296-2646. doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.743060
Pratte P, Cosandey S, Goujon Ginglinger C. Investigation of solid particles in the mainstream aerosol of the Tobacco Heating System THS2.2 and mainstream smoke of a 3R4F reference cigarette. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017;36(11):1115-1120. doi:10.1177/0960327116681653. PMID: Epub 2017 Jan 4. PMID: 27932538; PMCID: PMC5639962.
Uchiyama S, Noguchi M, Sato A, Ishitsuka M, Inaba Y, Kunugita N. Determination of thermal decomposition products generated from E-cigarettes. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020;33(2):576-583. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00410
Thorne D, Adamson J, Sticken ET, et al. An interlaboratory in vitro aerosol exposure system reference study. Toxicol Res Appl. 2021; doi:10.1177/2397847321992752
Smart DJ, Phillips G. Collecting e-cigarette aerosols for in vitro applications: a survey of the biomedical literature and opportunities to increase the value of submerged cell culture-based assessments. J Appl Toxicol. 2021;41(1):161-174. doi:10.1002/jat.4064. PMID: Epub 2020 Oct 4. PMID: 33015847; PMCID: PMC7756347.
Ishikawa S, Ito S. Repeated whole cigarette smoke exposure alters cell differentiation and augments secretion of inflammatory mediators in air-liquid interface three-dimensional co-culture model of human bronchial tissue. Toxicol In Vitro. 2017;38:170-178. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.09.004. PMID: Epub 2016 Sep 3. PMID: 27596523.
Talikka M, Kostadinova R, Xiang Y, et al. The response of human nasal and bronchial organotypic tissue cultures to repeated whole cigarette smoke exposure. Int J Toxicol. 2014;33(6):506-517. doi:10.1177/1091581814551647
Adamson J, Hughes S, Azzopardi D, McAughey J, Gaça MD. Real-time assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition in vitro. Chem Cent J. 2012;6(1):98. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-6-98
Adamson J, Thorne D, Dalrymple A, Dillon D, Meredith C. Assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition within the Vitrocell® exposure module using quartz crystal microbalances. Chem Cent J. 2013;7:50. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-7-50
Adamson J, Thorne D, McAughey J, Dillon D, Meredith C. Quantification of cigarette smoke particle deposition in vitro using a triplicate quartz crystal microbalance exposure chamber. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:685074. doi:10.1155/2013/685074. Epub 2012 Dec 26. PMID: 23484139; PMCID: PMC3591143
Kaur K, Overacker D, Ghandehari H, Reilly C, Paine R 3rd, Kelly KE. Determining real-time mass deposition with a quartz crystal microbalance in an electrostatic, parallel-flow, air-liquid interface exposure system. J Aerosol Sci. 2021;151:105653. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105653 PMID: Epub 2020 Sep 2. PMID: 33012843; PMCID: PMC7529104.
Keyser BM, Leverette R, Hollings M, Seymour A, Reeve L, Fields W. Investigation of multiple whole smoke dosimetry techniques using a VITROCELL®VC10® smoke exposure system. Toxicol Rep. 2019. ISSN 2214-7500;6:1281-1288. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.10.011
Majeed S, Frentzel S, Wagner S, et al. Charaterization of the Vitrocell® 24/48 in vitro aerosol exposure system using mainstream cigarette smoke. Chem Cent J. 2014;8(1):62. doi:10.1186/s13065-014-0062-3
Thorne D, Kilford J, Payne R, et al. Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis. Chem Cent J. 2013;7(1):146. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-7-146
Xiong R, Wu L, Wu Y, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals lung-specific miRNAs associated with impaired mucociliary clearance induced by cigarette smoke in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95(5):1763-1778. doi:10.1007/s00204-021-03016-0
Adamson J, Li X, Cui H, Thorne D, Xie F, Gaca MD. Nicotine quantification in vitro: a consistent dosimetry marker for e-cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke generation. Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2017;3(1):14-27. doi:10.1089/aivt.2016.0025
Hukkanen J, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(1):79-115. doi:10.1124/pr.57.1.3
Keyser BM, Leverette R, Fowler K, et al. Development of a quantitative method for assessment of dose in in vitro evaluations using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system. Toxicol In Vitro. 2019. ISSN 0887-2333;56:19-29. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2018.12.010
Lucci F, Castro ND, Rostami AA, et al. Characterization and modeling of aerosol deposition in Vitrocell® exposure systems-exposure well chamber deposition efficiency. J Aerosol Sci. 2018;123:141-160.
Ritter D, Knebel JW, Aufderheide M. Exposure of human lung cells to inhalable substances: a novel test strategy involving clean air exposure periods using whole diluted cigarette mainstream smoke. Inhal Toxicol. 2003;15(1):67-84. doi:10.1080/08958370304449. PMID: 12476361.
Fields W, Maione A, Keyser B, Bombick B. Characterization and application of the VITROCELL VC1 smoke exposure system and 3D EpiAirway models for toxicological and e-cigarette evaluations. Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2017;3. doi:10.1089/aivt.2016.0035
Okuwa K, Tanaka M, Fukano Y, Nara H, Nishijima Y, Nishino T. In vitro micronucleus assay for cigarette smoke using a whole smoke exposure system: a comparison of smoking regimens. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010;62(4):433-440. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2009.06.002
Radtke F, Susz A, Monni R, Stoop A, Verbeeck J, Maeder S. FTIR method for e-cigarette aerosol characterization, abstract 62. 70th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, September 18-21, 2016.
Frege C, Asgari M, Steiner S, et al. Assessment of single-photon ionization mass spectrometry for online monitoring of in vitro aerosol exposure experiments. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020;33(2):505-514. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00381
Steiner S, Majeed S, Kratzer G, Vuillaume G, Hoeng J, Frentzel S. Characterization of the Vitrocell® 24/48 aerosol exposure system for its use in exposures to liquid aerosols. Toxicol In Vitro. 2017;42:263-272. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2017.04.021. PMID: Epub 2017 Apr 27. PMID: 28457873.
Steiner S, Majeed S, Kratzer G, Hoeng J, Frentzel S. A new fluorescence-based method for characterizing in vitro aerosol exposure systems. Toxicol In Vitro. 2017;38:150-158. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.09.018. PMID: Epub 2016 Sep 21. PMID: 27664316.
Adamson J, Azzopardi D, Errington G, Dickens C, McAughey J, Gaca MD. Assessment of an in vitro whole cigarette smoke exposure system: the Borgwaldt RM20S 8-syringe smoking machine. Chem Cent J. 2011;5:50. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-5-50
Aufderheide M, Heller W-D, Krischenowski O, Mohle N, Hochrainer D. Improvement of the CULTEX® exposure technology by radial distribution of the test aerosol. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2017;69(6):359-365. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2017.02.004
Aufderheide M, Gressmann H. A modified Ames assay reveals the mutagenicity of native cigarette mainstream smoke and its gas vapour phase. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2007;58(6):383-392. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2007.02.002
Ishikawa S, Nagata Y, Suzuki T. Analysis of cigarette smoke deposition within an in vitro exposure system for simulating exposure in the human respiratory tract. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International/Contributions to Tobacco Research. 2016;27(1):20-29. doi:10.1515/cttr-2016-0004
Phillips G, Czekala L, Behrsing HP, et al. Acute electronic vapour product whole aerosol exposure of 3D human bronchial tissue results in minimal cellular and transcriptomic responses when compared to cigarette smoke. Toxicol Res Appl. 2021;5:1-9. doi:10.1177/2397847320988496
Jaunky T, Adamson J, Santopietro S, et al. Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 5: in vitro dosimetric and cytotoxic assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;93:52-61. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.016
Nara H, Fukano Y, Nishino T, Aufderheide M. Detection of the cytotoxicity of water-insoluble fraction of cigarette smoke by direct exposure to cultured cells at an air-liquid interface. Exp Toxicol Pathol 2013;65(5):683-688. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 19. PMID: 22999638.
Steiner S, Diana P, Dossin E, et al. Delivery efficiencies of constituents of combustion-derived aerosols across the air-liquid interface during in vitro exposures. Toxicol In Vitro. 2018;52:384-398. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2018.06.024
Health Canada. Health Canada Tobacco Reporting Regulations (TRR), SOR/2000-273(2000). 2000. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2000-273/
Davis B, To V, Talbot P. Comparison of cytotoxicity of IQOS aerosols to smoke from Marlboro Red and 3R4F reference cigarettes. Toxicol In Vitro. 2019;61:104652. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104652
Schaller JP, Keller D, Poget L, et al. Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;81(Suppl 2):S27-S47. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.10.001
ISO 3308. ISO 3308 Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine-definitions and standard conditions. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization-later revised by ISO 3308:2012. 2000.
ISO 20778. ISO 20778:2018 Cigarettes-routine analytical cigarette smoking machine-definitions and standard conditions with an intense smoking regime. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. 2018.
ISO 20768. ISO 20768:2018 Vapour products-routine analytical vaping machine-definitions and standard conditions. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. 2018.
Crosby L, Yucesoy B, Leggett C, et al. Smoke chemistry, in vitro cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity demonstrates enhanced toxicity of cigarillos compared with cigarettes. Toxicol Sci. 2021;180(1):122-135. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfaa155
Rammah M, Dandachi F, Salman R, Shihadeh A, El-Sabban M. In vitro cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of mainstream waterpipe smoke and its functional consequences on alveolar type II derived cells. Toxicol Lett. 2012;211(3):220-231. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.04.003
Shihadeh A, Schubert J, Klaiany J, El Sabban M, Luch A, Saliba NA. Toxicant content, physical properties and biological activity of waterpipe tobacco smoke and its tobacco-free alternatives. Tob Control. 2015;24:i22-i30. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051907
Zaarour RF, Prasad P, Venkatesh GH, et al. Waterpipe smoke condensate influences epithelial to mesenchymal transition and interferes with the cytotoxic immune response in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep. 2021;45(3):879-890. doi:10.3892/or.2021.7938
ISO 22486. ISO 22486:2019 Water pipe tobacco smoking machine-definitions and standard conditions. 2019.
Jaccard G, Tafin Djoko D, Korneliou A, Belushkin M. Analysis of waterpipe aerosol constituents in accordance with the ISO standard 22486. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:1344-1349. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.007
Scian MJ, Oldham MJ, Kane DB, Edmiston JS, McKinney WJ. Characterization of a whole smoke in vitro exposure system (Burghart Mimic Smoker-01). Inhal Toxicol. 2009;21(3):234-243. doi:10.1080/08958370802482515
Wieczorek R, Phillips G, Czekala L, et al. A comparative in vitro toxicity assessment of electronic vaping product e-liquids and aerosols with tobacco cigarette smoke. Toxicol Vitro 2020;66:104866. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104866
Rudd K, Stevenson M, Wieczorek R, et al. Chemical composition and in vitro toxicity profile of a pod-based e-cigarette aerosol compared to cigarette smoke. Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2020;6(1):11-41. doi:10.1089/aivt.2019.0015
Neilson L, Mankus C, Thorne D, Jackson G, DeBay J, Meredith C. Development of an in vitro cytotoxicity model for aerosol exposure using 3D reconstructed human airway tissue; application for assessment of e-cigarette aerosol. Toxicol In Vitro. 2015;29(7):1952-1962. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2015.05.018
Ghosh B, Reyes-Caballero H, Akgün-Ölmez SG, et al. Effect of sub-chronic exposure to cigarette smoke, electronic cigarette and waterpipe on human lung epithelial barrier function. BMC Pulm Med. 2020;20(1):216. doi:10.1186/s12890-020-01255-y
ISO:3308. ISO 3308:2012 Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine-definitions and standard conditions. 2012.
Dube MF, Green C. Methods of collection of smoke for analytical purposes. Recent Adv Tob Sci. 1982;8:42-102.
Baker RR, Pereira da Silva JR, Smith G. The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part I: flavourings and additives. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42(Suppl): S3-37. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00189-3. PMID: 15072836.
Kaushik G, Kaushik T, Khanduja S, Pathak CM, Khanduja KL. Cigarette smoke condensate promotes cell proliferation through disturbance in cellular redox homeostasis of transformed lung epithelial type-II cells. Cancer Lett 2008;270(1):120-131. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.039. Epub 2008 Jun 11. PMID: 18550274.
Luppi F, Aarbiou J, van Wetering S, et al. Effects of cigarette smoke condensate on proliferation and wound closure of bronchial epithelial cells in vitro: role of glutathione. Respir Res. 2005;6(140). doi:10.1186/1465-9921-6-140
Potts RJ, Bombick BR, Meckley DR, Ayres PH, Pence DH. A summary of toxicological and chemical data relevant to the evaluation of cast sheet tobacco. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2009;62(2):117-126. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2009.02.121
Roemer E, Tewes FJ, Meisgen TJ, Veltel DJ, Carmines EL. Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: in vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002;40(1):105-111. doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00086-2. PMID: 11731040.
Su Y, Han W, Giraldo C, de Li Y, Block ER. Effect of cigarette smoke extract on nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;19(5):819-825. doi:10.1165/ajrcmb.19.5.3091. PMID: 9806747.
Tewes FJ, Meisgen TJ, Veltel DJ, Roemer E, Patskan G. Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 3: genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of mainstream smoke. J Appl Toxicol. 2003;23(5):341-348. doi:10.1002/jat.925. PMID: PMID: 12975773.
Johnson MD, Schilz J, Djordjevic MV, Rice JR, Shields PG. Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(12):3263-3304. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0965
Borgerding MF, Milhous LA, Hicks RD, et al. Cigarette smoke composition. Part 2. Method for determining major components in smoke of cigarettes that heat instead of burn tobacco. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990;73:610-615. PMID: 2211484.
Hochstetler S, Race N, Collins D, et al. A comparison of quartz filter collection versus electrostatic precipitation collection in e-cigarette aerosol samples. CORESTA, 2019. https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/abstracts/2019_TSRC72_Gillman.pdf
BS ISO 10315:2021. Cigarettes-determination of nicotine in total particulate matter-gas chromatographic method.
BS ISO 16632:2021. Tobacco and tobacco products-determination of water content-gas chromatographic method.
BS ISO 6488:2001. Tobacco and tobacco products-determination of water content-Karl Fischer method.
Health Canada. Health Canada Tobacco Reporting Regulations (TRR), Official Method T-502. Neutral red uptake assay for mainstream tobacco smoke. Department of Health; 2017.
Godec TL, Crooks I, Scott K, Meredith C. In vitro mutagenicity of gas-vapour phase extracts from flavoured and unflavoured heated tobacco products. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:1155-1163. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.10.007
Roemer E, Zenzen V, Conroy LL, et al. Automation of the in vitro micronucleus and chromosome aberration assay for the assessment of the genotoxicity of the particulate and gas-vapor phase of cigarette smoke. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2015;25(4):320-333. doi:10.3109/15376516.2015.1037413. PMID: Epub 2015 May 19. PMID: 25986082.
ISO:4387. ISO 4387:2019-cigarettes-determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine. 2019.
Bozhilova S, Baxter A, Bishop E, et al. Optimization of aqueous aerosol extract (AqE) generation from e-cigarettes and tobacco heating products for in vitro cytotoxicity testing. Toxicol Lett. 2020;335:51-63. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.10.005
Makwana O, Smith GA, Flockton HE, Watters GP, Lowe F, Breheny D. Impact of cigarette versus electronic cigarette aerosol conditioned media on aortic endothelial cells in a microfluidic cardiovascular model. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4747. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83511-7. PMID: 33637800; PMCID: PMC7910588.
Makwana O, Flockton H, Smith GA, Watters GP, Nisar R, Fields W. Mechanisms of whole smoke conditioned media induced cytotoxicity to human aortic endothelial cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2019;58:239-244. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2019.03.011
Lacroix G, Koch W, Ritter D, et al. Air-liquid interface in vitro models for respiratory toxicology research: consensus workshop and recommendations. Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2018;4(2):91-106. doi:10.1089/aivt.2017.0034
Li X. In vitro toxicity testing of cigarette smoke based on the air-liquid interface exposure: a review. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016;36:105-113. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.019
Behrsing H, Hill E, Raabe H, et al. In vitro exposure systems and dosimetry assessment tools for inhaled tobacco products: workshop proceedings, conclusions and paths forward for in vitro model use. Altern Lab Anim. 2017;45(3):117-158. doi:10.1177/026119291704500305
Adamson J, Jaunky T, Thorne D, Gaça M. Characterisation of the Borgwaldt LM4E system for in vitro exposures to undiluted aerosols from next generation tobacco and nicotine products (NGPs). Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;113:337-344. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.005
Thorne D, Hollings M, Seymour A, et al. Extreme testing of undiluted e-cigarette aerosol in vitro using an Ames air-agar-interface technique. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2018;828:46-54. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.01.008
Adamson J, Thorne D, Errington G, et al. An inter-machine comparison of tobacco smoke particle deposition in vitro from six independent smoke exposure systems. Toxicol In Vitro. 2014;28(7):1320-1328. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2014.06.012
Behrsing H, Aragon M, Adamson J, et al. Characterization of a Vitrocell VC1 using nicotine dosimetry: an essential component toward standardized in vitro aerosol exposure of tobacco and next generation nicotine delivery products. Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2018;4(2):159-166. doi:10.1089/aivt.2018.0001
Oldham MJ, Castro N, Zhang J, et al. Comparison of experimentally measured and computational fluid dynamic predicted deposition and deposition uniformity of monodisperse solid particles in the Vitrocell® AMES 48 air-liquid-interface in-vitro exposure system. Toxicol In Vitro. 2020;67:10487. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104870
Oldham MJ, Castro N, Zhang J, et al. Deposition efficiency and uniformity of monodisperse solid particle deposition in the Vitrocell® 24/48 air-liquid-interface in vitro exposure system. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020;54:52-65. doi:10.1080/02786826.2019.1676877
Iskandar AR, Xiang Y, Frentzel S, et al. Impact assessment of cigarette smoke exposure on organotypic bronchial epithelial tissue cultures: a comparison of mono-culture and coculture model containing fibroblasts. Toxicol Sci. 2015;147(1):207-221. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfv122
Zhang S, Li X, Xie F, Liu K, Liu H, Xie J. Evaluation of whole cigarette smoke induced oxidative stress in A549 and BEAS-2B cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;54:40-47. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2017.06.023
Shinkichi I, Kanemaru Y, Nara H, Erami K, Nagata Y. Assessing the mutagenic activities of smoke from different cigarettes in direct exposure experiments using the modified Ames Salmonella assay. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2016;803-804:13-21. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.04.008
Fowler K, Fields W, Hargreaves V, Reeve L, Bombick B. Development, qualification, validation and application of the Ames test using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system. Toxicol Rep. 2018;5:542-551. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.04.003
Aufderheide M, Gressmann H. A modified Ames assay reveals the mutagenicity of native cigarette mainstream smoke and its gas vapor phase. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2007; 58(6):383-392. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2007.02.002
Adamson J, Thorne D, Zainuddin B, Baxter A, McAughey J, Gaça M. Application of dosimetry tools for the assessment of e-cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke generated on two different in vitro exposure systems. Chem Cent J. 2016;10:74. doi:10.1186/s13065-016-0221-9
Thorne D, Wieczorek R, Fukushima T, et al. A survey of aerosol exposure systems relative to the analysis of cytotoxicity: a Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA) perspective. Toxicol Res Appl. 2021. doi:10.1177/23978473211022267
Thorne D, Bishop E, Haswell L, Gaça M. A case study for the comparison of in vitro data across multiple aerosol exposure studies with extrapolation to human dose. Appl In Vitro Toxicol. 2018;4(2):167-179. doi:10.1089/aivt.2017.0042
Sauerbrey G. Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung. Z Physik. 1959;155:206-222. doi:10.1007/BF01337937
Kaur K, Mohammadpour R, Jaramillo IC, et al. Application of a quartz crystal microbalance to measure the mass concentration of combustion particle suspensions. J Aerosol Sci. 2019;137:105445. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105445. PMID: Epub 2019 Aug 31. PMID: 32863423; PMCID: PMC7448758.