Comparative analysis of right ventricular strain in Fabry cardiomyopathy and sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Fabry disease
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
right ventricle
speckle-tracking echocardiography
strain analysis
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 03 2023
21 03 2023
Historique:
received:
09
03
2022
revised:
22
06
2022
accepted:
15
07
2022
pubmed:
29
7
2022
medline:
24
3
2023
entrez:
28
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To perform a comparative analysis of right ventricle (RV) myocardial mechanics, assessed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE), between patients with Fabry disease and patients with sarcomeric disease. Patients with Fabry cardiomyopathy (FC) (n = 28) were compared with patients with sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), matched for degree of left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH) and demographic characteristics (n = 112). In addition, patients with Fabry disease and no LVH [phenotype-negative carriers of pathogenic α-galactosidase gene mutations (GLA LVH-)] (n = 28) were compared with age and sex-matched carriers of sarcomeric gene mutations without LVH [Phenotype-negative carriers of pathogenic sarcomeric gene mutations (Sarc LVH-)] (n = 56). Standard echocardiography and 2D-STE were performed in all participants. Despite a subtle impairment of RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) was common in both groups, patients with FC showed a more prominent reduction of RV free wall longitudinal strain (RV-FWS) and lower values of difference between RV-FWS and RV-GLS (ΔRV strain), in comparison to individuals with HCM (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). RV-FWS and ΔRV strain demonstrated an independent and additive value in discriminating FC from HCM, over the presence of symmetric LVH, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and RV hypertrophy. Similar results were found in GLA LVH- patients: they had worse RV-FWS and lower values of ΔRV strain as compared to Sarc LVH- patients (both P < 0.001). Patients with FC show a specific pattern of RV myocardial mechanics, characterized by a larger impairment of RV-FWS and lower ΔRV strain in comparison to patients with HCM, which may be helpful in the differential diagnosis between these two diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35900225
pii: 6651101
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac151
pmc: PMC10029843
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
542-551Subventions
Organisme : European Society of Cardiology
ID : App000080404
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Bioventrix, Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare and Edwards Lifesciences. J.B. received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. N.A.M. received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and GE Healthcare and has been in the Medical Advisory Board of Philips Ultrasound. F.G. and R.L. received board meetings and speaker honoraria from Sanofi-Genzyme and Takeda. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Références
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar 22;23(4):487-495
pubmed: 34687538
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 15;100(8):1293-8
pubmed: 17920373
Echocardiography. 2017 Apr;34(4):504-510
pubmed: 28256008
Echocardiography. 2019 Nov;36(11):2041-2049
pubmed: 31661576
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8
pubmed: 20620859
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 23;77(7):922-936
pubmed: 33602475
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Jan;37(1):37-43
pubmed: 21084151
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Nov;21(11):1265-8
pubmed: 18835697
Heart. 2010 Dec;96(23):1915-9
pubmed: 20965976
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;9(2):e003866
pubmed: 26860970
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb;31(2):301-13
pubmed: 25315709
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
Int J Cardiol. 2021 May 1;330:84-90
pubmed: 33600844
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1754-1760
pubmed: 30249441
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Mar;30(3):282-291
pubmed: 28069318
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Feb;11(2):351-8
pubmed: 2963057
Circulation. 2003 Jul 29;108(4):395-8
pubmed: 12860897
Echocardiography. 2013 Oct;30(9):1069-77
pubmed: 23600802
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun 21;23(7):898-912
pubmed: 35147667
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Nov;28(11):1329-38
pubmed: 26296986
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1605-1614
pubmed: 32432376
Circulation. 2003 Apr 22;107(15):1978-84
pubmed: 12668521
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec;17(12):1321-1360
pubmed: 27422899
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):3022-3055
pubmed: 33229115
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):604-612
pubmed: 31204037
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1448-58
pubmed: 23211230
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011269
pubmed: 30798647