Understanding SUMO-mediated adaptive responses in plants to improve crop productivity.
abiotic
biotic
plants
protein modification
stress
Journal
Essays in biochemistry
ISSN: 1744-1358
Titre abrégé: Essays Biochem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0043306
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 08 2022
05 08 2022
Historique:
received:
11
03
2022
revised:
13
07
2022
accepted:
20
07
2022
pubmed:
4
8
2022
medline:
9
8
2022
entrez:
3
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The response to abiotic and biotic stresses in plants and crops is considered a multifaceted process. Due to their sessile nature, plants have evolved unique mechanisms to ensure that developmental plasticity remains during their life cycle. Among these mechanisms, post-translational modifications (PTMs) are crucial components of adaptive responses in plants and transduce environmental stimuli into cellular signalling through the modulation of proteins. SUMOylation is an emerging PTM that has received recent attention due to its dynamic role in protein modification and has quickly been considered a significant component of adaptive mechanisms in plants during stress with great potential for agricultural improvement programs. In the present review, we outline the concept that small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-mediated response in plants and crops to abiotic and biotic stresses is a multifaceted process with each component of the SUMO cycle facilitating tolerance to several different environmental stresses. We also highlight the clear increase in SUMO genes in crops when compared with Arabidopsis thaliana. The SUMO system is understudied in crops, given the importance of SUMO for stress responses, and for some SUMO genes, the apparent expansion provides new avenues to discover SUMO-conjugated targets that could regulate beneficial agronomical traits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35920279
pii: 231621
doi: 10.1042/EBC20210068
pmc: PMC9400072
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ubiquitin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
155-168Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Références
Proteomes. 2016 Dec 21;4(4):
pubmed: 28248251
Mol Plant. 2013 Sep;6(5):1646-60
pubmed: 23482370
J Mol Biol. 1998 Jul 10;280(2):275-86
pubmed: 9654451
Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Jul;6(7):793-807
pubmed: 7579695
Plant Sci. 2019 Apr;281:113-121
pubmed: 30824044
Mol Plant. 2013 Sep;6(5):1388-404
pubmed: 23307436
Plant J. 2017 Dec;92(6):1031-1043
pubmed: 29024118
J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 28;278(9):6862-72
pubmed: 12482876
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 24;19(6):R265-6
pubmed: 19321147
FEBS Open Bio. 2017 Sep 18;7(10):1622-1634
pubmed: 28979848
Database (Oxford). 2021 Apr 7;2021:
pubmed: 33826699
J Exp Bot. 2016 Jan;67(1):353-63
pubmed: 26494731
Mol Cells. 2011 Oct;32(4):305-16
pubmed: 21912873
Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:355-82
pubmed: 15189146
Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 5;9(1):5185
pubmed: 30518761
J Integr Plant Biol. 2017 Jan;59(1):2-14
pubmed: 27762067
PLoS Genet. 2021 Oct 25;17(10):e1009830
pubmed: 34695110
J Exp Bot. 2018 Aug 31;69(19):4625-4632
pubmed: 29897480
Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;9(12):
pubmed: 33348543
New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(1):172-85
pubmed: 26934536
Planta. 2004 Nov;220(1):1-8
pubmed: 15449058
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201716
pubmed: 30092010
J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 5;194(3):531-44
pubmed: 3041007
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Sep 18;10:1122
pubmed: 31620153
Trends Cell Biol. 2010 Apr;20(4):223-32
pubmed: 20189809
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Apr 16;5:135
pubmed: 24795732
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2019;343:65-110
pubmed: 30712675
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 14;6:218
pubmed: 25926839
Plant J. 2010 Mar;61(6):909-21
pubmed: 20409266
PLoS Biol. 2020 Nov 24;18(11):e3000949
pubmed: 33232314
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 19;21(1):
pubmed: 31861556
J Plant Physiol. 2019 Sep;240:152993
pubmed: 31212102
Cell. 2002 Feb 8;108(3):345-56
pubmed: 11853669
New Phytol. 2012 Jul;195(1):23-31
pubmed: 22799003
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Dec 17;6:1019
pubmed: 26734014
Int J Genomics. 2020 Jun 24;2020:9703638
pubmed: 32802829
Plant Cell. 2009 Aug;21(8):2284-97
pubmed: 19666737
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 9;118(10):
pubmed: 33649235
Science. 2018 Dec 21;362(6421):1407-1410
pubmed: 30573626
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021 Mar;78(6):2641-2664
pubmed: 33452901
J Integr Plant Biol. 2013 Jan;55(1):83-95
pubmed: 23231763
Plant Physiol. 2007 Sep;145(1):119-34
pubmed: 17644626
Plant Cell. 2010 Jun;22(6):1998-2016
pubmed: 20525853
Plant Cell Physiol. 2018 Jan 1;59(1):58-71
pubmed: 29069432
Environ Int. 2016 Jan;86:14-23
pubmed: 26479830
Plant Cell. 2008 Oct;20(10):2894-908
pubmed: 18849491
J Exp Bot. 2018 Aug 31;69(19):4539-4554
pubmed: 29931319
Am J Bot. 2010 Dec;97(12):2049-60
pubmed: 21616851
Plant Signal Behav. 2016 May 3;11(5):e1173301
pubmed: 27119209
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D298-D308
pubmed: 30418626
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):349
pubmed: 30541427
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 21;8:1458
pubmed: 28878795
J Plant Physiol. 2022 Jan;268:153588
pubmed: 34906794
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Apr 09;12:652170
pubmed: 33897743
Plant Cell. 2014 Nov;26(11):4547-60
pubmed: 25415977
Exp Mol Med. 2020 Jun;52(6):931-939
pubmed: 32591648
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Jun;19(6):1537-1544
pubmed: 29024335
Plant J. 2007 Jan;49(1):79-90
pubmed: 17163880
Biochem J. 2011 Jun 15;436(3):581-90
pubmed: 21413927
Biomol Concepts. 2017 Mar 1;8(1):13-36
pubmed: 28284030
Cell Host Microbe. 2015 Aug 12;18(2):169-82
pubmed: 26269953
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015 Dec;22(12):959-67
pubmed: 26524493
Open Biol. 2017 Oct;7(10):
pubmed: 29021212
Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Apr 1;58(4):735-746
pubmed: 28340002
Plant Cell. 2007 Sep;19(9):2952-66
pubmed: 17905899
J Exp Bot. 2016 Apr;67(9):2541-8
pubmed: 27012284
J Exp Bot. 2021 Sep 30;72(18):6640-6658
pubmed: 34145454
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Oct;45(Pt A):143-154
pubmed: 30014889
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:299-334
pubmed: 21370976