Architecture and self-assembly of the jumbo bacteriophage nuclear shell.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
31
01
2022
accepted:
22
06
2022
pubmed:
4
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
entrez:
3
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bacteria encode myriad defences that target the genomes of infecting bacteriophage, including restriction-modification and CRISPR-Cas systems
Identifiants
pubmed: 35922510
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05013-4
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-05013-4
pmc: PMC9365700
doi:
Substances chimiques
Viral Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
429-435Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM144121
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB009380
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM133351
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM129325
Pays : United States
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM031749
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM129245
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S. & Wolf, Y. I. Evolutionary genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 233–261 (2017).
pubmed: 28657885
pmcid: 5898197
doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093830
Chaikeeratisak, V. et al. Assembly of a nucleus-like structure during viral replication in bacteria. Science 355, 194–197 (2017).
pubmed: 28082593
pmcid: 6028185
doi: 10.1126/science.aal2130
Mendoza, S. D. et al. A bacteriophage nucleus-like compartment shields DNA from CRISPR nucleases. Nature 577, 244–248 (2020).
pubmed: 31819262
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1786-y
Malone, L. M. et al. A jumbo phage that forms a nucleus-like structure evades CRISPR–Cas DNA targeting but is vulnerable to type III RNA-based immunity. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 48–55 (2020).
pubmed: 31819217
doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0612-5
Rostøl, J. T. & Marraffini, L. (Ph)ighting phages: how bacteria resist their parasites. Cell Host Microbe 25, 184–194 (2019).
pubmed: 30763533
pmcid: 6383810
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.009
Hampton, H. G., Watson, B. N. J. & Fineran, P. C. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature 577, 327–336 (2020).
pubmed: 31942051
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8
Li, Y. & Bondy-Denomy, J. Anti-CRISPRs go viral: The infection biology of CRISPR–Cas inhibitors. Cell Host Microbe 29, 704–714 (2021).
pubmed: 33444542
pmcid: 8122014
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.007
Chaikeeratisak, V. et al. The phage nucleus and tubulin spindle are conserved among large Pseudomonas phages. Cell Rep. 20, 1563–1571 (2017).
pubmed: 28813669
pmcid: 6028189
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.064
Chaikeeratisak, V. et al. Viral capsid trafficking along treadmilling tubulin filaments in bacteria. Cell 177, 1771–1780 (2019).
pubmed: 31199917
pmcid: 7301877
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.032
Pohl, J. Aztec, Mixtec and Zapotec Armies (Osprey, 1991).
Yashiro, Y., Yamashita, S. & Tomita, K. Crystal structure of the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli AtaT–AtaR toxin–antitoxin complex. Structure 27, 476–484 (2019).
pubmed: 30612860
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2018.11.005
Ilca, S. L. et al. Localized reconstruction of subunits from electron cryo-microscopy images of macromolecular complexes. Nat. Commun. 6, 8843 (2015).
pubmed: 26534841
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9843
Ding, K. et al. In situ structures of rotavirus polymerase in action and mechanism of mRNA transcription and release. Nat. Commun. 10, 2216 (2019).
pubmed: 31101900
pmcid: 6525196
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10236-7
M Iyer, L., Anantharaman, V., Krishnan, A., Burroughs, A. M. & Aravind, L. Jumbo phages: a comparative genomic overview of core functions and adaptions for biological conflicts. Viruses 13, 63 (2021).
pubmed: 33466489
pmcid: 7824862
doi: 10.3390/v13010063
Birkholz, E. A. et al. A cytoskeletal vortex drives phage nucleus rotation during jumbo phage replication in E. coli. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.25.465362 (2021).
Heymann, J. B. et al. The mottled capsid of the giant phage SPN3US, a likely maturation intermediate with a novel internal shell. Viruses 12, 910 (2020).
pmcid: 7552025
doi: 10.3390/v12090910
Nieweglowska, E. S. et al. The ϕPA3 phage nucleus is enclosed by a self-assembling, 2D crystalline lattice. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.06.487387 (2022).
Danilova, Y. A. et al. Maturation of pseudo-nucleus compartment in infected with giant PhiKZ phage. Viruses 12, 1097 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/v12101197
Reilly, E. R. et al. A cut above the rest: characterization of the assembly of a large viral icosahedral capsid. Viruses 12, 725 (2020).
pmcid: 7411985
doi: 10.3390/v12070725
Weintraub, S. T. et al. Global proteomic profiling of infection by a giant phage. J. Virol. 93, e01833-18 (2019).
pubmed: 30541839
pmcid: 6384053
doi: 10.1128/JVI.01833-18
Serwer, P. et al. Improved isolation of undersampled bacteriophages: finding of distant terminase genes. Virology 329, 412–424 (2004).
pubmed: 15518819
doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.021
Qiu, D., Damron, F. H., Mima, T., Schweizer, H. P. & Yu, H. D. PBAD-based shuttle vectors for functional analysis of toxic and highly regulated genes in Pseudomonas and Burkholderia spp. and other bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 7422–7426 (2008).
pubmed: 18849445
pmcid: 2592904
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01369-08
Nguyen, K. T. et al. Selective transport of fluorescent proteins into the phage nucleus. PLoS ONE 16, e0251429 (2021).
pubmed: 34111132
pmcid: 8191949
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251429
Lam, V. & Villa, E. Practical approaches for Cryo-FIB milling and applications for cellular cryo-electron tomography. Methods Mol. Biol. 2215, 49–82 (2021).
pubmed: 33367999
pmcid: 8836527
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0966-8_3
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
pubmed: 16182563
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007
Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198 (2017).
pubmed: 27313000
pmcid: 5287356
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.06.007
Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).
pubmed: 31591575
pmcid: 6858868
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0580-y
Mastronarde, D. N. & Held, S. R. Automated tilt series alignment and tomographic reconstruction in IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 102–113 (2017).
pubmed: 27444392
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.07.011
Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryo-microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24–35 (2013).
pubmed: 23872039
pmcid: 3834153
doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.004
Tegunov, D., Xue, L., Dienemann, C., Cramer, P. & Mahamid, J. Multi-particle cryo-EM refinement with M visualizes ribosome-antibiotic complex at 3.5 Å in cells. Nat. Methods 18, 186–193 (2021).
pubmed: 33542511
pmcid: 7611018
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01054-7
Bharat, T. A. M., Russo, C. J., Löwe, J., Passmore, L. A. & Scheres, S. H. W. Advances in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy structure determination applied to sub-tomogram averaging. Structure 23, 1743–1753 (2015).
pubmed: 26256537
pmcid: 4559595
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.06.026
Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
pubmed: 23000701
pmcid: 3690530
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006
Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo catalogue: geometrical tools and data management for particle picking in subtomogram averaging of cryo-electron tomograms. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 135–144 (2017).
pubmed: 27288866
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.06.005
Qu, K. et al. Structure and architecture of immature and mature murine leukemia virus capsids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11751–E11760 (2018).
pubmed: 30478053
pmcid: 6294937
Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 281–287 (2007).
pubmed: 16963278
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.010
Kovtun, O. et al. Structure of the membrane-assembled retromer coat determined by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 561, 561–564 (2018).
pubmed: 30224749
pmcid: 6173284
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0526-z
Burt, A., Gaifas, L., Dendooven, T. & Gutsche, I. A flexible framework for multi-particle refinement in cryo-electron tomography. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001319 (2021).
pubmed: 34437530
pmcid: 8389456
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001319
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
pubmed: 22743772
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Scaramuzza, S. & Castaño-Díez, D. Step-by-step guide to efficient subtomogram averaging of virus-like particles with Dynamo. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001318 (2021).
pubmed: 34437529
pmcid: 8389376
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001318
Martinez-Sanchez, A., Garcia, I., Asano, S., Lucic, V. & Fernandez, J.-J. Robust membrane detection based on tensor voting for electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 186, 49–61 (2014).
pubmed: 24625523
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.02.015
Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012).
pubmed: 22245546
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.017
Salfer, M., Collado, J. F., Baumeister, W., Fernández-Busnadiego, R. & Martínez-Sánchez, A. Reliable estimation of membrane curvature for cryo-electron tomography. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007962 (2020).
pubmed: 32776920
pmcid: 7444595
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007962
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
pubmed: 8742726
doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. Estimation of high-order aberrations and anisotropic magnification from cryo-EM data sets in RELION-3.1. IUCrJ 7, 253–267 (2020).
pubmed: 32148853
pmcid: 7055373
doi: 10.1107/S2052252520000081
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. IUCrJ 6, 5–17 (2019).
pubmed: 30713699
pmcid: 6327179
doi: 10.1107/S205225251801463X
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
pubmed: 28165473
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169
Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).
pubmed: 33257830
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8
Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).
pubmed: 28671674
pmcid: 5533649
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4347
Pfab, J., Phan, N. M. & Si, D. DeepTracer for fast de novo cryo-EM protein structure modeling and special studies on CoV-related complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017525118 (2021).
pubmed: 33361332
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017525118
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20383002
pmcid: 2852313
doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 531–544 (2018).
doi: 10.1107/S2059798318006551
Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).
pubmed: 29067766
doi: 10.1002/pro.3330
Barad, B. A. et al. EMRinger: side chain-directed model and map validation for 3D cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 943–946 (2015).
pubmed: 26280328
pmcid: 4589481
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3541
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007).
pubmed: 17681537
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022
Gallivan, J. P. & Dougherty, D. A. Cation-π interactions in structural biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9459–9464 (1999).
pubmed: 10449714
pmcid: 22230
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9459
Karami, Y. et al. DaReUS-Loop: a web server to model multiple loops in homology models. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W423–W428 (2019).
pubmed: 31114872
pmcid: 6602439
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz403
Jurrus, E. et al. Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite. Protein Sci. 27, 112–128 (2018).
pubmed: 28836357
doi: 10.1002/pro.3280
Wang, J., Cieplak, P. & Kollman, P. A. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J. Comput. Chem. 21, 1049–1074 (2000).
doi: 10.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12<1049::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-F
Olsson, M. H. M., Søndergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pK
pubmed: 26596171
doi: 10.1021/ct100578z
Dolinsky, T. J., Nielsen, J. E., McCammon, J. A. & Baker, N. A. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson–Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W665–7 (2004).
pubmed: 15215472
pmcid: 441519
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh381
Bahar, I., Lezon, T. R., Yang, L.-W. & Eyal, E. Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39, 23–42 (2010).
pubmed: 20192781
pmcid: 2938190
doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131258
Lezon, T. R., Shrivastava, I. H., Yang, Z. & Bahar, I. In Handbook on Biological Networks (eds Boccaletti, S. & Romero, Y.) 129–158 (World Scientific, 2009).
Leioatts, N., Romo, T. D. & Grossfield, A. Elastic network models are robust to variations in formalism. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 2424–2434 (2012).
pubmed: 22924033
pmcid: 3424003
doi: 10.1021/ct3000316
Bauer, J. A., Pavlović, J. & Bauerová-Hlinková, V. Normal mode analysis as a routine part of a structural investigation. Molecules 24, 3293 (2019).
pmcid: 6767145
doi: 10.3390/molecules24183293
López-Blanco, J. R., Miyashita, O., Tama, F. & Chacón, P. Normal mode analysis techniques in structural biology. eLS https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0020204.pub2 (2014).
Atilgan, A. R. et al. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80, 505–515 (2001).
pubmed: 11159421
pmcid: 1301252
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76033-X
Hu, G. Identification of allosteric effects in proteins by elastic network models. Methods Mol. Biol. 2253, 21–35 (2021).
pubmed: 33315216
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1154-8_3
Bahar, I., Cheng, M. H., Lee, J. Y., Kaya, C. & Zhang, S. Structure-encoded global motions and their role in mediating protein-substrate interactions. Biophys. J. 109, 1101–1109 (2015).
pubmed: 26143655
pmcid: 4576147
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.004
Erman, B. The Gaussian network model: precise prediction of residue fluctuations and application to binding problems. Biophys. J. 91, 3589–3599 (2006).
pubmed: 16935951
pmcid: 1630469
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.090803
Bakan, A., Meireles, L. M. & Bahar, I. ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments. Bioinformatics 27, 1575–1577 (2011).
pubmed: 21471012
pmcid: 3102222
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168
Bakan, A. et al. Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics. Bioinformatics 30, 2681–2683 (2014).
pubmed: 24849577
pmcid: 4155247
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu336
Tekpinar, M. & Yildirim, A. Only a subset of normal modes is sufficient to identify linear correlations in proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 1947–1961 (2018).
pubmed: 30148964
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00486
Case, D. A. et al. Amber 2021 (University of California, San Francisco, 2021).
Li, P. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Taking into account the ion-induced dipole interaction in the nonbonded model of ions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 289–297 (2014).
pubmed: 24659926
doi: 10.1021/ct400751u
Li, P., Song, L. F. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Systematic parameterization of monovalent ions employing the nonbonded model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1645–1657 (2015).
pubmed: 26574374
doi: 10.1021/ct500918t
Salomon-Ferrer, R., Götz, A. W., Poole, D., Le Grand, S. & Walker, R. C. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3878–3888 (2013).
pubmed: 26592383
doi: 10.1021/ct400314y
Götz, A. W. et al. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1542–1555 (2012).
pubmed: 22582031
pmcid: 3348677
doi: 10.1021/ct200909j
Grand, S. L., Le Grand, S., Götz, A. W. & Walker, R. C. SPFP: speed without compromise—a mixed precision model for GPU accelerated molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 374–380 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.022
Izadi, S., Anandakrishnan, R. & Onufriev, A. V. Building water models: a different approach. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3863–3871 (2014).
pubmed: 25400877
pmcid: 4226301
doi: 10.1021/jz501780a
Tian, C. et al. ff19SB: Amino-acid-specific protein backbone parameters trained against quantum mechanics energy surfaces in solution. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 528–552 (2020).
pubmed: 31714766
doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591
Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
Loncharich, R. J., Brooks, B. R. & Pastor, R. W. Langevin dynamics of peptides: the frictional dependence of isomerization rates of N-acetylalanyl-N′-methylamide. Biopolymers 32, 523–535 (1992).
pubmed: 1515543
doi: 10.1002/bip.360320508
Pastor, R. W., Brooks, B. R. & Szabo, A. An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms. Mol. Phys. 65, 1409–1419 (1988).
doi: 10.1080/00268978800101881
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).
doi: 10.1063/1.448118
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
doi: 10.1063/1.464397
Roe, D. R. & Cheatham, T. E. 3rd PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3084–3095 (2013).
pubmed: 26583988
doi: 10.1021/ct400341p
McGibbon, R. T. et al. MDTraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophys. J. 109, 1528–1532 (2015).
pubmed: 26488642
pmcid: 4623899
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015
Klesse, G., Rao, S., Sansom, M. S. P. & Tucker, S. J. CHAP: A versatile tool for the structural and functional annotation of ion channel pores. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 3353–3365 (2019).
pubmed: 31220459
pmcid: 6699600
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.003
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
pubmed: 32881101
doi: 10.1002/pro.3943
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
pubmed: 8744570
doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5