ELIMINATOR: essentiality analysis using multisystem networks and integer programming.
Constrain-based modelling
Gene essentiality analysis
In-silico methods
Multisystem networks
Journal
BMC bioinformatics
ISSN: 1471-2105
Titre abrégé: BMC Bioinformatics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965194
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Aug 2022
06 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
10
02
2022
accepted:
21
07
2022
entrez:
6
8
2022
pubmed:
7
8
2022
medline:
10
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A gene is considered as essential when it is indispensable for cells to grow and replicate in a certain environment. However, gene essentiality is not a structural property but rather a contextual one, which depends on the specific biological conditions affecting the cell. This circumstantial essentiality of genes is what brings the attention of scientist since we can identify genes essential for cancer cells but not essential for healthy cells. This same contextuality makes their identification extremely challenging. Huge experimental efforts such as Project Achilles where the essentiality of thousands of genes is measured together with a plethora of molecular data (transcriptomics, copy number, mutations, etc.) in over one thousand cell lines can shed light on the causality behind the essentiality of a gene in a given environment. Here, we present an in-silico method for the identification of patient-specific essential genes using constraint-based modelling (CBM). Our method expands the ideas behind traditional CBM to accommodate multisystem networks. In essence, it first calculates the minimum number of lowly expressed genes required to be activated by the cell to sustain life as defined by a set of requirements; and second, it performs an exhaustive in-silico gene knockout to find those that lead to the need of activating additional lowly expressed genes. We validated the proposed methodology using a set of 452 cancer cell lines derived from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia where an exhaustive experimental large-scale gene knockout study using CRISPR (Achilles Project) evaluates the impact of each removal. We also show that the integration of different essentiality predictions per gene, what we called Essentiality Congruity Score, reduces the number of false positives. Finally, we explored our method in a breast cancer patient dataset, and our results showed high concordance with previous publications. These findings suggest that identifying genes whose activity is fundamental to sustain cellular life in a patient-specific manner is feasible using in-silico methods. The patient-level gene essentiality predictions can pave the way for precision medicine by identifying potential drug targets whose deletion can induce death in tumour cells.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35933325
doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04855-z
pii: 10.1186/s12859-022-04855-z
pmc: PMC9357337
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
324Subventions
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía y competititvidad NEOTEC 2021
ID : CABALA EXP - SNEO-20211362
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía y competititvidad NEOTEC 2021
ID : CABALA EXP - SNEO-20211362
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0122333
pubmed: 25848952
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):603-7
pubmed: 22460905
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov;132(11):685-97
pubmed: 16786358
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 15;26(12):i237-45
pubmed: 20529912
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Nov 27;19(6):1370-1381
pubmed: 28679163
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D674-9
pubmed: 18832364
Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 1;78(21):6059-6072
pubmed: 30135189
Brief Bioinform. 2020 Mar 23;21(2):566-583
pubmed: 30776072
Nat Genet. 2017 Dec;49(12):1779-1784
pubmed: 29083409
Cell. 2017 Jul 27;170(3):564-576.e16
pubmed: 28753430
J Biol Chem. 2019 Jan 18;294(3):887-901
pubmed: 30463939
Carcinogenesis. 2015 Mar;36(3):346-54
pubmed: 25568185
Oncol Lett. 2017 Mar;13(3):1753-1760
pubmed: 28454320
Mol Syst Biol. 2014 Mar 19;10:721
pubmed: 24646661
Brief Bioinform. 2020 Jul 15;21(4):1397-1410
pubmed: 31504171
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Sep 2;22(5):
pubmed: 33842944
Bioinformatics. 2021 Apr 20;37(3):396-403
pubmed: 32790840
Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 6;8(1):459
pubmed: 28878380
Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:331
pubmed: 19953085
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 16;11(8):
pubmed: 31426369
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D455-8
pubmed: 18974178
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jan;19(1):51-62
pubmed: 29082913
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 08;8(4):e61362
pubmed: 23593472
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 30;7(1):14358
pubmed: 29084986
Oncol Rep. 2019 Sep;42(3):1047-1056
pubmed: 31322262
Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Sep 7;6:408
pubmed: 20823846
Mol Cell. 2017 Feb 2;65(3):380-392
pubmed: 28157503
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 28;16:345
pubmed: 26510976
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19472-7
pubmed: 17159154
PLoS One. 2013 May 20;8(5):e63712
pubmed: 23700430
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3153-4
pubmed: 23044545
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D938-43
pubmed: 24271388
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2022 May-Jun;19(3):1615-1626
pubmed: 33497339
Nature. 2011 Aug 17;477(7363):225-8
pubmed: 21849978
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0177678
pubmed: 28574989
Cell Death Dis. 2020 Dec 2;11(12):1029
pubmed: 33268769
PLoS One. 2016 May 04;11(5):e0154583
pubmed: 27145226
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jul 1;27(13):1741-8
pubmed: 21596790