Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924).
Adrenergic beta-Agonists
Birth Weight
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ therapeutic use
Child
Female
Headache
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Magnesium Sulfate
/ therapeutic use
Network Meta-Analysis
Nitric Oxide Donors
/ therapeutic use
Pregnancy
Premature Birth
/ prevention & control
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Receptors, Oxytocin
Tocolytic Agents
/ adverse effects
Vomiting
/ drug therapy
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 08 2022
10 08 2022
Historique:
entrez:
10
8
2022
pubmed:
11
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in newborns and children. Tocolytic drugs aim to delay preterm birth by suppressing uterine contractions to allow time for administration of corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation, magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection, and transport to a facility with appropriate neonatal care facilities. However, there is still uncertainty about their effectiveness and safety. To estimate relative effectiveness and safety profiles for different classes of tocolytic drugs for delaying preterm birth, and provide rankings of the available drugs. We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov (21 April 2021) and reference lists of retrieved studies. We included all randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness or adverse effects of tocolytic drugs for delaying preterm birth. We excluded quasi- and non-randomised trials. We evaluated all studies against predefined criteria to judge their trustworthiness. At least two review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses, to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available tocolytics. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of the network meta-analysis effect estimates for each tocolytic versus placebo or no treatment. This network meta-analysis includes 122 trials (13,697 women) involving six tocolytic classes, combinations of tocolytics, and placebo or no treatment. Most trials included women with threatened preterm birth, singleton pregnancy, from 24 to 34 weeks of gestation. We judged 25 (20%) studies to be at low risk of bias. Overall, certainty in the evidence varied. Relative effects from network meta-analysis suggested that all tocolytics are probably effective in delaying preterm birth compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment. Betamimetics are possibly effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.20; low-certainty evidence), and 7 days (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25; low-certainty evidence). COX inhibitors are possibly effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). Calcium channel blockers are possibly effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.24; low-certainty evidence), probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 7 days (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence), and prolong pregnancy by 5 days (0.1 more to 9.2 more; high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulphate is probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.23; moderate-certainty evidence). Oxytocin receptor antagonists are probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.22; moderate-certainty evidence), are effective in delaying preterm birth by 7 days (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.30; high-certainty evidence), and possibly prolong pregnancy by 10 days (95% CI 2.3 more to 16.7 more). Nitric oxide donors are probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31; moderate-certainty evidence), and 7 days (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.37; moderate-certainty evidence). Combinations of tocolytics are probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence), and 7 days (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34; moderate-certainty evidence). Nitric oxide donors ranked highest for delaying preterm birth by 48 hours and 7 days, and delay in birth (continuous outcome), followed by calcium channel blockers, oxytocin receptor antagonists and combinations of tocolytics. Betamimetics (RR 14.4, 95% CI 6.11 to 34.1; moderate-certainty evidence), calcium channel blockers (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.23 to 7.11; moderate-certainty evidence), magnesium sulphate (RR 3.90, 95% CI 1.09 to 13.93; moderate-certainty evidence) and combinations of tocolytics (RR 6.87, 95% CI 2.08 to 22.7; low-certainty evidence) are probably more likely to result in cessation of treatment. Calcium channel blockers possibly reduce the risk of neurodevelopmental morbidity (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.85; low-certainty evidence), and respiratory morbidity (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88; low-certainty evidence), and result in fewer neonates with birthweight less than 2000 g (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87; low-certainty evidence). Nitric oxide donors possibly result in neonates with higher birthweight (mean difference (MD) 425.53 g more, 95% CI 224.32 more to 626.74 more; low-certainty evidence), fewer neonates with birthweight less than 2500 g (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69; low-certainty evidence), and more advanced gestational age (MD 1.35 weeks more, 95% CI 0.37 more to 2.32 more; low-certainty evidence). Combinations of tocolytics possibly result in fewer neonates with birthweight less than 2500 g (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.93; low-certainty evidence). In terms of maternal adverse effects, betamimetics probably cause dyspnoea (RR 12.09, 95% CI 4.66 to 31.39; moderate-certainty evidence), palpitations (RR 7.39, 95% CI 3.83 to 14.24; moderate-certainty evidence), vomiting (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.91; moderate-certainty evidence), possibly headache (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.42; low-certainty evidence) and tachycardia (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.17 to 7.71; low-certainty evidence) compared with placebo or no treatment. COX inhibitors possibly cause vomiting (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.18 to 5.48; low-certainty evidence). Calcium channel blockers (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.39 to 4.83; low-certainty evidence), and nitric oxide donors probably cause headache (RR 4.20, 95% CI 2.13 to 8.25; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment, all tocolytic drug classes that we assessed (betamimetics, calcium channel blockers, magnesium sulphate, oxytocin receptor antagonists, nitric oxide donors) and their combinations were probably or possibly effective in delaying preterm birth for 48 hours, and 7 days. Tocolytic drugs were associated with a range of adverse effects (from minor to potentially severe) compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment, although betamimetics and combination tocolytics were more likely to result in cessation of treatment. The effects of tocolytic use on neonatal outcomes such as neonatal and perinatal mortality, and on safety outcomes such as maternal and neonatal infection were uncertain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in newborns and children. Tocolytic drugs aim to delay preterm birth by suppressing uterine contractions to allow time for administration of corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation, magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection, and transport to a facility with appropriate neonatal care facilities. However, there is still uncertainty about their effectiveness and safety.
OBJECTIVES
To estimate relative effectiveness and safety profiles for different classes of tocolytic drugs for delaying preterm birth, and provide rankings of the available drugs.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov (21 April 2021) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness or adverse effects of tocolytic drugs for delaying preterm birth. We excluded quasi- and non-randomised trials. We evaluated all studies against predefined criteria to judge their trustworthiness.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
At least two review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses, to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available tocolytics. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of the network meta-analysis effect estimates for each tocolytic versus placebo or no treatment.
MAIN RESULTS
This network meta-analysis includes 122 trials (13,697 women) involving six tocolytic classes, combinations of tocolytics, and placebo or no treatment. Most trials included women with threatened preterm birth, singleton pregnancy, from 24 to 34 weeks of gestation. We judged 25 (20%) studies to be at low risk of bias. Overall, certainty in the evidence varied. Relative effects from network meta-analysis suggested that all tocolytics are probably effective in delaying preterm birth compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment. Betamimetics are possibly effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.20; low-certainty evidence), and 7 days (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25; low-certainty evidence). COX inhibitors are possibly effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). Calcium channel blockers are possibly effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.24; low-certainty evidence), probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 7 days (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence), and prolong pregnancy by 5 days (0.1 more to 9.2 more; high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulphate is probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.23; moderate-certainty evidence). Oxytocin receptor antagonists are probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.22; moderate-certainty evidence), are effective in delaying preterm birth by 7 days (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.30; high-certainty evidence), and possibly prolong pregnancy by 10 days (95% CI 2.3 more to 16.7 more). Nitric oxide donors are probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31; moderate-certainty evidence), and 7 days (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.37; moderate-certainty evidence). Combinations of tocolytics are probably effective in delaying preterm birth by 48 hours (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence), and 7 days (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34; moderate-certainty evidence). Nitric oxide donors ranked highest for delaying preterm birth by 48 hours and 7 days, and delay in birth (continuous outcome), followed by calcium channel blockers, oxytocin receptor antagonists and combinations of tocolytics. Betamimetics (RR 14.4, 95% CI 6.11 to 34.1; moderate-certainty evidence), calcium channel blockers (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.23 to 7.11; moderate-certainty evidence), magnesium sulphate (RR 3.90, 95% CI 1.09 to 13.93; moderate-certainty evidence) and combinations of tocolytics (RR 6.87, 95% CI 2.08 to 22.7; low-certainty evidence) are probably more likely to result in cessation of treatment. Calcium channel blockers possibly reduce the risk of neurodevelopmental morbidity (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.85; low-certainty evidence), and respiratory morbidity (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88; low-certainty evidence), and result in fewer neonates with birthweight less than 2000 g (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87; low-certainty evidence). Nitric oxide donors possibly result in neonates with higher birthweight (mean difference (MD) 425.53 g more, 95% CI 224.32 more to 626.74 more; low-certainty evidence), fewer neonates with birthweight less than 2500 g (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69; low-certainty evidence), and more advanced gestational age (MD 1.35 weeks more, 95% CI 0.37 more to 2.32 more; low-certainty evidence). Combinations of tocolytics possibly result in fewer neonates with birthweight less than 2500 g (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.93; low-certainty evidence). In terms of maternal adverse effects, betamimetics probably cause dyspnoea (RR 12.09, 95% CI 4.66 to 31.39; moderate-certainty evidence), palpitations (RR 7.39, 95% CI 3.83 to 14.24; moderate-certainty evidence), vomiting (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.91; moderate-certainty evidence), possibly headache (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.42; low-certainty evidence) and tachycardia (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.17 to 7.71; low-certainty evidence) compared with placebo or no treatment. COX inhibitors possibly cause vomiting (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.18 to 5.48; low-certainty evidence). Calcium channel blockers (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.39 to 4.83; low-certainty evidence), and nitric oxide donors probably cause headache (RR 4.20, 95% CI 2.13 to 8.25; moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment, all tocolytic drug classes that we assessed (betamimetics, calcium channel blockers, magnesium sulphate, oxytocin receptor antagonists, nitric oxide donors) and their combinations were probably or possibly effective in delaying preterm birth for 48 hours, and 7 days. Tocolytic drugs were associated with a range of adverse effects (from minor to potentially severe) compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment, although betamimetics and combination tocolytics were more likely to result in cessation of treatment. The effects of tocolytic use on neonatal outcomes such as neonatal and perinatal mortality, and on safety outcomes such as maternal and neonatal infection were uncertain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35947046
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014978.pub2
pmc: PMC9364967
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-Agonists
0
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Nitric Oxide Donors
0
Receptors, Oxytocin
0
Tocolytic Agents
0
Magnesium Sulfate
7487-88-9
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01429545', 'NCT00306462', 'NCT02132533', 'NCT00811057', 'NCT00185900', 'NCT00599898', 'NCT02538718', 'NCT00185952', 'NCT00116623', 'NCT00463736', 'NCT00525486', 'NCT00620724', 'NCT00641784', 'NCT01314859', 'NCT01360034', 'NCT01577121', 'NCT01796522', 'NCT01985594', 'NCT02438371', 'NCT02583633', 'NCT03040752', 'NCT00486824', 'NCT03369262', 'NCT03976063', 'NCT00466128', 'NCT01869361', 'NCT02725736', 'NCT03129945', 'NCT03298191', 'NCT03542552', 'NCT04404686', 'NCT04846621']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD014978Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
Panminerva Med. 1994 Dec;36(4):168-70
pubmed: 7603732
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):307-16
pubmed: 11093348
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;93(1):79-83
pubmed: 9916961
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Oct 1;138(3):345-6
pubmed: 7416228
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;195(2):484-7
pubmed: 16707077
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):822-7
pubmed: 10521736
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):965-9
pubmed: 8238158
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(19):3215-3220
pubmed: 30696306
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):144-7
pubmed: 1733187
Lancet. 1986 Jun 7;1(8493):1293-6
pubmed: 2872429
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 30;327(5):308-12
pubmed: 1620169
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1166-9; discussion 1169-71
pubmed: 9215169
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Sep;161(3):788-95
pubmed: 2782362
Tunis Med. 2008 Jan;86(1):43-8
pubmed: 19472699
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):61-7
pubmed: 17601897
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56(4):293-6
pubmed: 602695
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):683-90
pubmed: 15467526
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1975;54(2):95-100
pubmed: 1094787
J Pediatr. 1994 May;124(5 Pt 1):782-8
pubmed: 8176569
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;(1):CD006770
pubmed: 24482121
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):767-72
pubmed: 2206069
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1978 Jun;8(3):123-8
pubmed: 400862
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008 Feb;30(2):87-92
pubmed: 19142481
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;272(1):26-30
pubmed: 15909190
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(6):590-600
pubmed: 18568457
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):875-82
pubmed: 20080027
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1986;108(7):419-23
pubmed: 3087091
BMJ. 2012 Oct 09;345:e6226
pubmed: 23048010
BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):133-42
pubmed: 11236112
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Jun 15;10:317-323
pubmed: 29942162
J Perinat Med. 2004;32(3):220-4
pubmed: 15188794
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Mar;32(4):387-92
pubmed: 25241107
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Nov 1;129(5):482-91
pubmed: 910835
J Reprod Med. 1990 Jun;35(6):649-53
pubmed: 2359062
J Matern Fetal Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;7(1):8-12
pubmed: 9502662
Semin Reprod Med. 2008 Sep;26(5):423-35
pubmed: 18825610
J Perinatol. 2014 Sep;34(9):683-7
pubmed: 24811226
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2003 Apr-Jun;1(2):85-90
pubmed: 16388203
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct;74(4):567-72
pubmed: 2677863
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;90(2):230-4
pubmed: 9241299
Iran J Reprod Med. 2014 Feb;12(2):145-50
pubmed: 24799873
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec 15;153(8):854-9
pubmed: 4073155
Ann Saudi Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):370-5
pubmed: 20697169
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):550-4
pubmed: 8059840
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):204-8
pubmed: 16310305
J Perinat Med. 2007;35(4):305-13
pubmed: 17614750
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 1):1753-9
pubmed: 1750473
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(7):613-6
pubmed: 3909732
J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:965060
pubmed: 21773032
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70(3):187-91
pubmed: 1927294
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):818-27
pubmed: 22461129
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Dec;100(12):1090-4
pubmed: 8297841
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):838-42
pubmed: 8885732
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 May;85(2):165-7
pubmed: 15099781
Am J Perinatol. 1997 Feb;14(2):87-91
pubmed: 9259905
Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2117-2124
pubmed: 26944026
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):874-8
pubmed: 9790362
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):585-594
pubmed: 19300321
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 05;(2):CD004352
pubmed: 24500892
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):653-60
pubmed: 12237643
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Apr;178(4):862-6
pubmed: 9579457
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Apr;30(2):81-8
pubmed: 16731282
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;95(4):477-81
pubmed: 10725475
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1228-34
pubmed: 16978233
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):177-85
pubmed: 11574128
Minerva Ginecol. 1983 Jun;35(6):423-9
pubmed: 6621926
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;53(3):309-12
pubmed: 25286782
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;169(1):97-102
pubmed: 8333483
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):474-8
pubmed: 8116700
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 10;8:CD014978
pubmed: 35947046
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1191-9
pubmed: 10819857
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Sep;159(3):685-9
pubmed: 3048103
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1173-83
pubmed: 10819855
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 05;(6):CD001992
pubmed: 26042617
BJOG. 2005 Jun;112(6):725-30
pubmed: 15924527
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:27-30
pubmed: 26476796
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1990 Sep;58:265-9
pubmed: 2276652
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;33(7):696-702
pubmed: 26871905
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 May;97(2):147-8
pubmed: 17368462
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Mar;37(3):134-5
pubmed: 11953077
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Jun;61(3):239-44
pubmed: 9688484
J Pediatr. 2002 May;140(5):540-6
pubmed: 12032519
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015 Jul 14;16(3):174-8
pubmed: 26401112
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):274-5
pubmed: 15919396
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Sep;66(3):297-8
pubmed: 10580682
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep;94(3):403-8
pubmed: 10472868
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 May;27(8):801-6
pubmed: 24090282
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Nov;80(5):847-51
pubmed: 1407926
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;(8):CD001060
pubmed: 25126773
J Perinat Med. 1984;12(1):25-9
pubmed: 6374098
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;74(2):109-15
pubmed: 22797552
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 May;67(5):607-13
pubmed: 3515261
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):129-34
pubmed: 16446025
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1993;36(2):102-7
pubmed: 8225043
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Nov;90(11):2461-9
pubmed: 18181335
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e309-e317
pubmed: 32380566
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):259-63
pubmed: 19021095
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):923-30
pubmed: 15121566
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;203(6):565.e1-6
pubmed: 20817132
Pediatr Pharmacol (New York). 1983;3(2):101-6
pubmed: 6371693
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 16;(8):CD010073
pubmed: 23949874
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep;88(3):331-6
pubmed: 8752234
Croat Med J. 2006 Feb;47(1):25-31
pubmed: 16489694
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1323-31
pubmed: 23168756
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;196(1):37.e1-8
pubmed: 17240225
Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):187-90
pubmed: 6986040
BJOG. 2000 Sep;107(9):1182-3
pubmed: 11002973
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181(6):1432-7
pubmed: 10601925
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Sep 01;9:38
pubmed: 19723320
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977 Jan;84(1):26-30
pubmed: 321000
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct;80(4):740-9
pubmed: 25819462
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Jan;100(1):65-8
pubmed: 17894937
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jul;103(7):702-5
pubmed: 8688399
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;85(5 Pt 1):769-74
pubmed: 7724111
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Jan;84(1):98-104
pubmed: 11281506
Electron Physician. 2015 Aug 10;7(4):1144-9
pubmed: 26396726
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):1065-70
pubmed: 8238121
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 May;73(1):11-6
pubmed: 9175683
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(3):340-5
pubmed: 18307075
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;32(5):451-60
pubmed: 25486290
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;168(3 Pt 1):865-8
pubmed: 8456894
Dan Med Bull. 1979 May;26(3):121-2
pubmed: 376230
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Sep;93(9):933-7
pubmed: 3533134
Lancet. 2017 Dec 17;388(10063):3027-3035
pubmed: 27839855
South Med J. 1998 Nov;91(11):1028-32
pubmed: 9824184
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966 Jul 15;95(6):885-6
pubmed: 5949532
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Dec;31(12):721-3
pubmed: 9387512
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;31(11):552-8
pubmed: 20084326
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0173717
pubmed: 28333939
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1221-1226
pubmed: 19037029
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):897-900
pubmed: 16223826
BJOG. 2006 May;113(5):528-35
pubmed: 16637897
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):163-71
pubmed: 20688472
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011 Oct;61(5):534-7
pubmed: 23024524
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(5):696-700
pubmed: 25747947
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Apr 25;107(2):168-75
pubmed: 12648863
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):879-82
pubmed: 2206076
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Sep 09;9:42
pubmed: 19737426
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1184-90
pubmed: 10819856
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 05;(6):CD002255
pubmed: 24901312
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):631-7
pubmed: 3548382
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;159(1):216-22
pubmed: 3134815
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Mar;76(3):311-3
pubmed: 11880137
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19(4):478-82
pubmed: 2380510
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Apr;77(2):171-6
pubmed: 9578274
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Feb;84(2):109-13
pubmed: 14871511
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;157(2):388-93
pubmed: 3303937
Anaesthesia. 2017 Aug;72(8):944-952
pubmed: 28580651
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 Nov;87(11):949-57
pubmed: 7002205
Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2):372-6
pubmed: 15286219
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 08;(5):CD002860
pubmed: 24809331
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Jun;22(6):485-90
pubmed: 19479644
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jul;98(7):685-91
pubmed: 1883793
Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2002 Apr;33(2):288-90
pubmed: 12575212
Lancet. 1997 Nov 22;350(9090):1517-8
pubmed: 9388401
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):976-81
pubmed: 16580286
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 Sep;86(9):706-9
pubmed: 387068
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011 Oct;61(5):512-5
pubmed: 23024518
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul;66(1):55-8
pubmed: 4011071
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Nov;66(5):621-3
pubmed: 3903579
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Jul;91(4):F238-44
pubmed: 16611647
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Apr;164(4):981-6; discussion 986-8
pubmed: 2014850
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Aug;93(8):802-8
pubmed: 24773243
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2009 Oct;213(5):201-6
pubmed: 19856243
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(5):421-6
pubmed: 3904315
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;69(1):88-90
pubmed: 3796926
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Jun;28(6):473-8
pubmed: 21170827
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Oct;91(1):10-4
pubmed: 16043178
Duodecim. 1985;101(20):1966-71
pubmed: 2867886
Am J Perinatol. 1991 Nov;8(6):365-9
pubmed: 1814297
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):73-78
pubmed: 34259466
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1966 Nov;6(4):294-8
pubmed: 5232199
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1992;21(4):370-4
pubmed: 1624721
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984 Apr;22(2):117-23
pubmed: 6145635
Mil Med. 1982 Apr;147(4):305-7
pubmed: 6815559
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2001 Sep-Oct;205(5):189-94
pubmed: 11727665
BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630
pubmed: 25252733
J Reprod Med. 1982 Jun;27(6):348-51
pubmed: 7120214
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Apr 15;127(8):837-45
pubmed: 851140
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Mar 03;14:93
pubmed: 24589124
Dan Med Bull. 1979 May;26(3):116-8
pubmed: 446106
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):806-812
pubmed: 28452086
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015 Mar;116(3):244-50
pubmed: 25146233
Br Med J. 1971 Jul 17;3(5767):144-7
pubmed: 4397654
Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jul;56(1):7-12
pubmed: 6992003
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):98-110
pubmed: 26062084
J Pregnancy. 2014;2014:869698
pubmed: 25400947
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Mar;94(3):249-51
pubmed: 3567122
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;94(4):572-6
pubmed: 10511361
Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1988 Apr;108(4):283-9
pubmed: 3387763
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):960-4
pubmed: 8238157
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):814-8
pubmed: 9369825
Mymensingh Med J. 2012 Jan;21(1):139-44
pubmed: 22314470
Am J Perinatol. 1993 Jul;10(4):280-4
pubmed: 8397562
Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;57(1):22-5
pubmed: 7005777
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Apr 15;136(8):1014-9
pubmed: 7369252
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jun 15;125(4):520-4
pubmed: 790961
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;160(3):713-7
pubmed: 2564741
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Aug;54(2):220-3
pubmed: 379722
JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):41-7
pubmed: 23280223
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;165(3):603-10
pubmed: 1892185
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 May;80(5):413-22
pubmed: 11328217
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;113(3):192-5
pubmed: 21457979
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Dec;25(12):2778-81
pubmed: 22873356
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015 Jun 01;16(2):80-5
pubmed: 26097389
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jun;54(3):231-6
pubmed: 24506318
J Perinatol. 1993 Sep-Oct;13(5):349-53
pubmed: 8263618
J Reprod Infertil. 2014 Apr;15(2):71-7
pubmed: 24918079
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 May;20(9):1881-7
pubmed: 27212183
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2283-2291
pubmed: 28556962
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;164(1 Pt 1):141-6
pubmed: 1986601
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):627.e1-10
pubmed: 19306963
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 May;40(5):824-9
pubmed: 16638921
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 1):396-401
pubmed: 9988808
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;173(5):1518-22
pubmed: 7503194
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983 Aug;21(4):337-42
pubmed: 6141090
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Jul;82(1):5-10
pubmed: 12834935
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jan 10;106(1):14-9
pubmed: 12475575
Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res. 1980;8:1465-7
pubmed: 6990720
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 Oct;45(10):1109-14
pubmed: 8245589
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;167(4 Pt 1):1059-63
pubmed: 1415392
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):834-7
pubmed: 8885731
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):317-22
pubmed: 3822278
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1093-7
pubmed: 1945214
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 06;(6):CD004452
pubmed: 24903678
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1992 Mar;72(3):158-61, 191
pubmed: 1319808
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Jul;37(7):787-91
pubmed: 21395905
J Reprod Med. 1984 Feb;29(2):92-7
pubmed: 6708033
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jul;106(7):736-9
pubmed: 10428533
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):103-7
pubmed: 3541613
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Oct;33(5):631-4
pubmed: 17845320
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Dec 1;126(7):809-20
pubmed: 11689
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967 Feb;74(1):68-70
pubmed: 5334978
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;198(6):633.e1-8
pubmed: 18342290
J Formos Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;108(6):493-501
pubmed: 19515630
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:36-44
pubmed: 29051107
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Sep;80(9):818-23
pubmed: 11531632
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jan 15;148(2):166-71
pubmed: 6362416
Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):240-6
pubmed: 21296600
Pediatr Res. 1993 Jun;33(6):615-9
pubmed: 8378121
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;19(2):113-9
pubmed: 17353678
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:79-84
pubmed: 27567363
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;163(1 Pt 1):105-11
pubmed: 2197860
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb;53(2):171-4
pubmed: 418970
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jan 15;142(2):183-90
pubmed: 7055183
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 May;106(5):467-73
pubmed: 10430197