Motion-based microwave tomographic measurement device for three-dimensional coverage in a magnetic resonance system.
breast cancer
magnetic resonance imaging
microwave imaging
multi-modality
phantom experiments
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
revised:
10
07
2022
received:
08
04
2022
accepted:
03
08
2022
pubmed:
15
8
2022
medline:
28
12
2022
entrez:
14
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We have developed a fully 3D data acquisition system for microwave breast imaging which can operate simultaneously inside a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI is used regularly for breast imaging to distinguish tumors from normal tissue. It generally has poor specificity unless used with a gadolinium contrast agent. Microwave imaging could fill this need because of the good endogenous tumor:normal tissue property contrast, especially in light of safety concerns for gadolinium. The antenna array consists of 16 monopole antennas positioned in a horizontal circle surrounding the breast which can then be moved vertically for 3D coverage of the breast. The tank system materials were chosen to minimize artifacts in the MR image within the specific shared imaging zone. The support rods are stainless steel, albeit positioned sufficiently far from the imaging target to have little effect. The mechanical motion parts are all 3D printed plastic. Unlike many conventional antennas, the monopoles consist of just the center conductor and insulator of the coaxial cable, making it one of the least possible metallic structures. Data were acquired both inside and outside of the MR bore to confirm that the MR bore did not have adverse effects on the microwave imaging process. The imaging tank was filled with a mixture of glycerin and water to both provide a reasonable property match to the phantom and to highly attenuate the fields which also acted to suppress multi-path signals. Microwave images were reconstructed using our Gauss-Newton scheme combined with a log transformation for a more linear convergence. MR images were also acquired to assess the effects of the microwave tank structures on the imaging. The microwave measurement data were acquired in log magnitude and phase format at 200 MHz increments from 700-1900 MHz. Each antenna acted sequentially as a transmitter while the complement of 15 acted as a receiver. The single frequency images were reconstructed using a Gauss-Newton iterative technique with a standard log transformation to linearize the process. The data showed that the signal strengths were between 7-10 dB lower for the case when the array was inside the MRI versus when not. Notwithstanding, the image quality was still high because of the significant signal to noise ratio. The reconstructed images in both situations demonstrated good 3D object recovery of the vertically size and shaped varying object. The MR images were not adversely affected by the presence of antennas or feed structures. We have demonstrated that our technique can recover high-quality images of a 3D varying object within an MRI system. Compatibility issues have been addressed for both the microwave and MRI systems. The reduced SNR for the case operating in the MRI did not adversely affect the images. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a microwave imaging system operating in an MRI with full 3D volumetric capability.
Substances chimiques
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7638-7647Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA240760
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA240760
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Schnall MD. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to early detection of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2001;3:17-21.
Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3524-3531.
Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1095-1102.
Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:333-341.
Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:619-626.
Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004;292:2735-2742.
Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295-1303.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75-89.
Park JM, Franken EA Jr., Garg M, Fajardo LL, Niklason LT. Breast tomosynthesis: Present considerations and future applications. RadioGraphics. 2007;27:S231-S240.
Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:616-623.
Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13-30.
Bartella, L, Smith CS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Imaging breast cancer. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45:45-67.
Segal AJ, Bush WH Jr. Avoidable errors in dealing with anaphylactoid reactions to iodinated contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:147-151.
Nicholas BA, Vricella GJ, Smith M, Passalacqua M, Gulani V, Ponsky LE. Contrast-induced nephropathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: Minimizing the risk. Can J Urol. 2012;19:6074-6080.
FDA Drug Safety Communication: “New warnings for using gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with kidney dysfunction”, US Food and Drug Administration. 2010. Accessed September 9, 2010. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm223966.htm
Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E, Reeder SB. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:564-570.
Terashima KH, Reich DS. Gadolinium deposition: practical guidelines in the face of uncertainty. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:495-497.
Yang WT, Carkaci S, Chen L, et al. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Feasibility study with surgical mastectomy specimens. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1312-1315.
Lord ML, Chettle DR, Grafe JL, Noseworthy MD, McNeill FE. Observed deposition of gadolinium in bone using a new noninvasive in vivo biomedical device: Results of a small pilot feasibility study. Radiology. 2017;287:96-103.
McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2015;275:772-782.
Poplack SP, Paulsen KD, Hartov A, et al. Electromagnetic breast imaging: Pilot results in women with abnormal mammography. Radiology. 2007;243:350-359.
Lazebnik M, Popovic D, McCartney L, et al. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:6093-6115.
Sugitani T, Kubota S-I, Kuroki S-I, et al. Complex permittivities of breast tumor tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Appl Phys Lett. 2014;104:253702.
Martellosio A, Pasian M, Bozzi M, et al. Dielectric properties characterization from 0.5 to 50 GHz of breast cancer tissues. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2017;65:998-1011.
Cheng Y, Fu M. Dielectric properties for non-invasive detection of normal, benign, and malignant breast tissues using microwave theories. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9:459-465.
Meaney PM, Geimer SD, Paulsen KD. Two-step inversion in microwave imaging with a logarithmic transformation. Med Phys. 2017;44:4239-4251.
Meaney PM. Microwave imaging for two-dimensional electrical property distribution profiling. PhD Thesis. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH; 1995.
Golnabi AH, Meaney PM, Paulsen KD. Development of a soft prior algorithm for 3D microwave tomography. Med Phys. 2016;43:1933-1944.
Meaney PM, Golnabi AH, Epstein N, et al. Integration of a microwave tomographic imaging system with MR for improved breast imaging. Med Phys. 2013;40:103101.
Epstein NR, Meaney PM, Paulsen KD. 3D parallel-detection microwave tomography for clinical breast imaging. Rev Sci Instrum. 2014;85:124704.
Meaney PM, Schubitidze F, Fanning MW, Kmiec M, Epstein N, Paulsen KD. Surface wave multi-path signals in near-field microwave imaging. Int J Biomed. 2012;2012:697253.
Yang X, Eastlake T, Zheng T, et al. A dedicated 3-ch breast coil for microwave tomography at 3T. Proceedings of the ISMRM. 2021;4264.
Guy A. Analyses of electromagnetic fields induced in biological tissues by thermographic studies on equivalent phantom models. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 1971;19:205-213.
Meaney PM, Paulsen KD, Geimer S, Haider S, Fanning MW. Quantification of 3D field effects during 2D microwave imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49:708-720.