Comprehensive UHPLC- and CE-based methods for engineered Cas9 characterization.

CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-associated proteins (Cas) are powerful gene-editing tools used in therapeutic applications. Efforts to minimize off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 have motivated the development of engineered Cas9 variants. The wild-type (WT) Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) has been engineered into a high-fidelity Cas9 (SpyFi Cas9) that shows promising results in providing high on-target activity (targeting efficiency) while reducing off-target editing (unwanted mutations). This work describes for the first time the development of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based methods for a full characterization of different engineered Cas9 variants, including determination of purity, size variants, isoelectric points (pI), post-translational modifications (PTMs), and functional activities. The purity and size variant characterization were first determined by CE-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). An in vitro DNA cleavage assay using an automated electrophoresis tool was employed to investigate the functional activity of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes derived from Cas9 variants. The pIs of the engineered Cas9 proteins were determined by imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF), while intact mass measurements were performed by reversed-phase (RP)-UHPLC coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). A peptide mapping assay based on LC-UV-MS/MS using endoproteinase Lys-C under non-reducing conditions was developed to confirm amino acid sequences, allowing differentiation of SpyFi Cas9 from WT SpCas9. The potential of using a low-resolution MS detector, especially for a GMP environment, as a low-cost and simple method to identify SpyFi Cas9 is discussed.

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.