Increased intrathecal neurofilament light and immunoglobulin M predict severe disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
biomarkers
cerebrospinal fluid
intrathecal IgM synthesis
multiple sclerosis
neurofilament light
prognosis
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
13
06
2022
accepted:
25
07
2022
entrez:
29
8
2022
pubmed:
30
8
2022
medline:
31
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emerging evidence supports that determination of intrathecal immunoglobulin M (IgM) synthesis (ITMS) and neurofilament light (NfL) concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be clinically useful as disease severity biomarkers in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Monocentric observational longitudinal cohort study in which prospectively collected data were retrospectively retrieved. Included were patients with RRMS (n=457) who had a diagnostic investigation including analysis of ITMS and CSF neurofilament light (cNfL). ITMS was calculated with the linear index formula, the intrathecal fraction of IgM according to Reiber (IgM All investigated methods to calculate ITMS significantly predicted evidence of disease activity (EDA-3) within 24 months. IgM In a real-world setting, ITMS was a useful biomarker in early RRMS to predict disabling MS and its prognostic value was even stronger in combination with cNfL. Our data suggest that determination of ITMS and cNfL should be included in the diagnostic work-up of RRMS for prognostic purposes and in decisions of disease-modifying therapy.
Sections du résumé
Background
Emerging evidence supports that determination of intrathecal immunoglobulin M (IgM) synthesis (ITMS) and neurofilament light (NfL) concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be clinically useful as disease severity biomarkers in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
Methods
Monocentric observational longitudinal cohort study in which prospectively collected data were retrospectively retrieved. Included were patients with RRMS (n=457) who had a diagnostic investigation including analysis of ITMS and CSF neurofilament light (cNfL). ITMS was calculated with the linear index formula, the intrathecal fraction of IgM according to Reiber (IgM
Results
All investigated methods to calculate ITMS significantly predicted evidence of disease activity (EDA-3) within 24 months. IgM
Conclusions
In a real-world setting, ITMS was a useful biomarker in early RRMS to predict disabling MS and its prognostic value was even stronger in combination with cNfL. Our data suggest that determination of ITMS and cNfL should be included in the diagnostic work-up of RRMS for prognostic purposes and in decisions of disease-modifying therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36032114
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.967953
pmc: PMC9399944
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Oligoclonal Bands
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
967953Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Rosenstein, Rasch, Axelsson, Novakova, Blennow, Zetterberg and Lycke.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
IR has received compensation for lectures from biogen. MA has received compensation for lectures and/or advisory boards from Biogen, Genzyme, and Novartis. LN has received honoraria for lecture from Biogen, Novartis and Teva, and for advisory boards from Merck. KB has served as a consultant, at advisory boards, or at data monitoring committees for Abcam, Axon, BioArctic, Biogen, JOMDD/Shimadzu. Julius Clinical, Lilly, MagQu, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, all unrelated to the work presented in this paper. HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Alector, Annexon, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Pinteon Therapeutics, Red Abbey Labs, Passage Bio, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Alzecure, Biogen, and Roche, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program (outside submitted work). JL has received travel support and/or lecture honoraria and has served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme; and has received unconditional research grants from Biogen and Novartis. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neurology. 2011 Jun 7;76(23):1996-2001
pubmed: 21646626
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):307-316
pubmed: 32199096
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1197-1204
pubmed: 34398221
Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132(199):11-9
pubmed: 26046553
J Neurol. 2011 May;258(5):882-8
pubmed: 21197541
Mult Scler. 2022 May;28(6):872-884
pubmed: 34392718
J Clin Invest. 2005 Jan;115(1):187-94
pubmed: 15630459
Neurochem Res. 2000 Oct;25(9-10):1439-51
pubmed: 11059815
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 23;10:1008
pubmed: 31608004
Mult Scler. 2012 May;18(5):587-91
pubmed: 21965422
Mult Scler. 2017 Mar;23(3):456-463
pubmed: 27325603
J Neurol Sci. 1994 Apr;122(2):189-203
pubmed: 8021703
Mult Scler. 2012 Feb;18(2):174-80
pubmed: 21868488
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jul;63:103847
pubmed: 35550481
J Neurol Sci. 1990 May;96(2-3):131-42
pubmed: 2115907
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77(8):953-5
pubmed: 16574727
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;84(11):1192-8
pubmed: 23744892
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Apr;25(4):614-618
pubmed: 29272057
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Mult Scler. 2021 Feb;27(2):198-207
pubmed: 32091300
Mult Scler. 2011 Mar;17(3):335-43
pubmed: 21135023
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Jan;135(1):17-24
pubmed: 27558404
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
Mult Scler. 2008 Mar;14(2):183-7
pubmed: 17942517
Neurology. 2019 Oct 8;93(15):e1439-e1451
pubmed: 31501228
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
Mult Scler. 2020 Jun 12;:1352458520925369
pubmed: 32530385
Neurol Sci. 2018 Aug;39(8):1423-1430
pubmed: 29882169
Ann Neurol. 2021 Sep;90(3):477-489
pubmed: 34057235
Brain. 2014 Oct;137(Pt 10):2703-14
pubmed: 25060097
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2013 Apr;2(2):65-7
pubmed: 25877624
Ann Neurol. 2003 Feb;53(2):222-6
pubmed: 12557289
Mult Scler. 2020 Nov;26(13):1658-1669
pubmed: 31610739
Neurology. 2004 Nov 9;63(9):1586-90
pubmed: 15534240
Neurology. 2002 Aug 27;59(4):555-9
pubmed: 12196648
J Neuroimmunol. 2015 Jun 15;283:64-9
pubmed: 26004159
Mult Scler. 2021 Oct;27(11):1706-1716
pubmed: 33433258
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Jul 22;8(5):
pubmed: 34301819
Ann Neurol. 2018 May;83(5):1032-1036
pubmed: 29665046
J Neurol. 2018 Feb;265(2):424-430
pubmed: 29273846
J Neuroimmunol. 2013 Apr 15;257(1-2):76-81
pubmed: 23434160
Curr Dir Autoimmun. 2004;7:149-64
pubmed: 14719379
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 11;116(24):11900-11905
pubmed: 31147461
Neuroradiology. 2012 Jan;54(1):5-12
pubmed: 21327771
J Neuroimmunol. 2010 Sep 14;226(1-2):143-6
pubmed: 20538349
Mol Diagn Ther. 2020 Jun;24(3):263-277
pubmed: 32162206
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;4(4):329-33
pubmed: 26195051
Eur J Neurol. 2007 Aug;14(8):907-11
pubmed: 17662013
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Apr;23(4):713-21
pubmed: 26806360
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):841-849
pubmed: 31034002
Mult Scler. 2010 Mar;16(3):287-92
pubmed: 20086018