Dapagliflozin improves myocardial flow reserve in patients with type 2 diabetes: the DAPAHEART Trial: a preliminary report.
Diabetes
Metabolism
Myocardial blood flow
PET
Perfusion
SGLT-2
Journal
Cardiovascular diabetology
ISSN: 1475-2840
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diabetol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147637
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2022
03 09 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2022
accepted:
22
08
2022
entrez:
3
9
2022
pubmed:
4
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials have shown that in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) reduces CV mortality and hospital admission rates for heart failure (HF). However, the mechanisms behind these benefits are not fully understood. This study was performed to investigate the effects of the SGLT-2i dapagliflozin on myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism in patients with T2D and stable coronary artery disease (coronary stenosis ≥ 30% and < 80%), with or without previous percutaneous coronary intervention (> 6 months) but no HF. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial including 16 patients with T2D randomized to SGLT-2i dapagliflozin (10 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was to detect changes in myocardial glucose uptake (MGU) from baseline to 4 weeks after treatment initiation by [(18)F]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET/CT during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. The main secondary outcome was to assess whether the hypothetical changes in MGU were associated with changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured by 16 patients were randomized to dapagliflozin (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8). The groups were well-matched for baseline characteristics (age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, renal and heart function). There was no significant change in MGU during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in the dapagliflozin group (2.22 ± 0.59 vs 1.92 ± 0.42 μmol/100 g/min, p = 0.41) compared with the placebo group (2.00 ± 0.55 vs 1.60 ± 0.45 μmol/100 g/min, p = 0.5). Dapagliflozin significantly improved MFR (2.56 ± 0.26 vs 3.59 ± 0.35 p = 0.006 compared with the placebo group 2.34 ± 0.21 vs 2.38 ± 0.24 p = 0.81; p SGLT-2 inhibition increases MFR in T2D patients. We provide new insight into SGLT-2i CV benefits, as our data show that patients on SGLT-2i are more resistant to the detrimental effects of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis due to increased MFR, probably caused by an improvement in coronary microvascular dysfunction. Trial registration EudraCT No. 2016-003614-27; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03313752.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36057768
doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01607-4
pii: 10.1186/s12933-022-01607-4
pmc: PMC9440459
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzhydryl Compounds
0
Blood Glucose
0
Glucosides
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
dapagliflozin
1ULL0QJ8UC
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03313752']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Heart J. 2014 May;35(17):1101-11
pubmed: 24366916
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):31-39
pubmed: 30424892
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357
pubmed: 30415602
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 04;4(5):575-591
pubmed: 31768475
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2019 Jul-Aug;20(7-8 Suppl 1):1S-61S
pubmed: 31379378
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424
pubmed: 32865377
Cureus. 2021 Oct 4;13(10):e18485
pubmed: 34754647
Diabetologia. 2018 Mar;61(3):722-726
pubmed: 29197997
J Clin Invest. 2014 Feb;124(2):509-14
pubmed: 24463448
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jul;12(7):2101-2113
pubmed: 34037951
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2515-2522
pubmed: 30073768
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 14;384(2):117-128
pubmed: 33200892
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983 Mar;3(1):1-7
pubmed: 6822610
Cell Metab. 2019 Oct 1;30(4):609-613
pubmed: 31477497
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1094
pubmed: 26981940
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;9(2):942-946
pubmed: 35112512
Diabetes. 2021 Mar;70(3):800-808
pubmed: 33334875
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;164:138-141
pubmed: 34799085
Cell Signal. 2022 Feb;90:110206
pubmed: 34856357
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Mar 26;20(1):74
pubmed: 33771149
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Jan 17;9:2
pubmed: 29387042
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jun 11;20(1):121
pubmed: 34116674
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Apr 5;18(1):46
pubmed: 30953516
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306
pubmed: 30990260
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Nov;113(11):736-748
pubmed: 33189592
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e020418
pubmed: 34278803
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Mar;101(3):1249-56
pubmed: 26765576
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Apr;48(4):1040-1069
pubmed: 33135093
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jul;23(7):1505-1517
pubmed: 33625777
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Jun 15;21(1):106
pubmed: 35705980
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):973
pubmed: 32130823
Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):2036-2041
pubmed: 27561923
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):479-487
pubmed: 29024278
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Feb 7;18(1):16
pubmed: 30732594
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):931-937
pubmed: 30885955
Circ J. 2022 Aug 25;86(9):1319-1328
pubmed: 34759123
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Mar;16(3):137-44
pubmed: 24237386
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1431-1435
pubmed: 33606906
Heliyon. 2022 May 20;8(5):e09503
pubmed: 35647331
J Nucl Med. 2005 Jan;46(1):75-88
pubmed: 15632037
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Jul 15;:
pubmed: 35837991
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Oct;21(10):2211-2218
pubmed: 31209982
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Mar;40(3):506-522
pubmed: 31996025
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Jul;157:104781
pubmed: 32360273