Scientific and regulatory activities initiated by the U.S. Food and drug administration to foster approvals of generic dry powder inhalers: Bioequivalence perspective.
Bioequivalence
Dry powder inhaler
Generic drug product
Journal
Advanced drug delivery reviews
ISSN: 1872-8294
Titre abrégé: Adv Drug Deliv Rev
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710523
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
revised:
26
08
2022
accepted:
30
08
2022
pubmed:
7
9
2022
medline:
19
10
2022
entrez:
6
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Regulatory science for generic dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in the United States (U.S.) has evolved over the last decade. In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the draft product-specific guidance (PSG) for fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate inhalation powder. This was the first PSG for a DPI available in the U.S., which provided details on a weight-of-evidence approach for establishing bioequivalence (BE). A variety of research activities including in vivo and in vitro studies were used to support these recommendations, which have led to the first approval of a generic DPI in the U.S. for fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate inhalation powder in January of 2019. This review describes the scientific and regulatory activities that have been initiated by FDA to support the current BE recommendations for DPIs that led to the first generic DPI approvals, as well as research with novel in vitro and in silico methods that may potentially facilitate generic DPI development and approval.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36067967
pii: S0169-409X(22)00416-1
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114526
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drugs, Generic
0
Powders
0
Salmeterol Xinafoate
6EW8Q962A5
Fluticasone
CUT2W21N7U
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114526Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.