Structure of the HOPS tethering complex, a lysosomal membrane fusion machinery.
HOPS
Rab GTPase
S. cerevisiae
cell biology
lysosome
membrane fusion
molecular biophysics
structural biology
tethering
vacuole
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 09 2022
13 09 2022
Historique:
received:
08
06
2022
accepted:
12
09
2022
pubmed:
14
9
2022
medline:
26
10
2022
entrez:
13
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lysosomes are essential for cellular recycling, nutrient signaling, autophagy, and pathogenic bacteria and viruses invasion. Lysosomal fusion is fundamental to cell survival and requires HOPS, a conserved heterohexameric tethering complex. On the membranes to be fused, HOPS binds small membrane-associated GTPases and assembles SNAREs for fusion, but how the complex fulfills its function remained speculative. Here, we used cryo-electron microscopy to reveal the structure of HOPS. Unlike previously reported, significant flexibility of HOPS is confined to its extremities, where GTPase binding occurs. The SNARE-binding module is firmly attached to the core, therefore, ideally positioned between the membranes to catalyze fusion. Our data suggest a model for how HOPS fulfills its dual functionality of tethering and fusion and indicate why it is an essential part of the membrane fusion machinery. Our cells break down the nutrients that they receive from the body to create the building blocks needed to keep us alive. This is done by compartments called lysosomes that are filled with a cocktail of proteins called enzymes, which speed up the breakdown process. Lysosomes are surrounded by a membrane, a barrier of fatty molecules that protects the rest of the cell from being digested. When new nutrients reach the cell, they travel to the lysosome packaged in vesicles, which have their own fatty membrane. To allow the nutrients to enter the lysosome without creating a leak, the membranes of the vesicles and the lysosome must fuse. The mechanism through which these membranes fuse is not fully clear. It is known that both fusing membranes must contain proteins called SNAREs, which wind around each other when they interact. However, this alone is not enough. Other proteins are also required to tether the membranes together before they fuse. To understand how these tethers play a role, Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al. studied the structure of the HOPS complex from yeast. This assembly of six proteins is vital for lysosomal fusion and, has a composition similar to the equivalent complex in humans. Using cryo-electron microscopy, a technique that relies on freezing purified proteins to image them with an electron microscope and reveal their structure, allowed Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al. to provide a model for how HOPS interacts with SNAREs and membranes. In addition to HOPS acting as a tether to bring the membranes together, it can also bind directly to SNAREs. This creates a bridge that allows the proteins to wrap around each other, driving the membranes to fuse. HOPS is a crucial component in the cellular machinery, and mutations in the complex can cause devastating neurological defects. The complex is also targeted by viruses – such as SARS-CoV-2 – that manipulate HOPS to reduce its activity. Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al.’s findings could help researchers to develop drugs to maintain or recover the activity of HOPS. However, this will require additional information about its structure and how the complex acts in the biological environment of the cell.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Our cells break down the nutrients that they receive from the body to create the building blocks needed to keep us alive. This is done by compartments called lysosomes that are filled with a cocktail of proteins called enzymes, which speed up the breakdown process. Lysosomes are surrounded by a membrane, a barrier of fatty molecules that protects the rest of the cell from being digested. When new nutrients reach the cell, they travel to the lysosome packaged in vesicles, which have their own fatty membrane. To allow the nutrients to enter the lysosome without creating a leak, the membranes of the vesicles and the lysosome must fuse. The mechanism through which these membranes fuse is not fully clear. It is known that both fusing membranes must contain proteins called SNAREs, which wind around each other when they interact. However, this alone is not enough. Other proteins are also required to tether the membranes together before they fuse. To understand how these tethers play a role, Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al. studied the structure of the HOPS complex from yeast. This assembly of six proteins is vital for lysosomal fusion and, has a composition similar to the equivalent complex in humans. Using cryo-electron microscopy, a technique that relies on freezing purified proteins to image them with an electron microscope and reveal their structure, allowed Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al. to provide a model for how HOPS interacts with SNAREs and membranes. In addition to HOPS acting as a tether to bring the membranes together, it can also bind directly to SNAREs. This creates a bridge that allows the proteins to wrap around each other, driving the membranes to fuse. HOPS is a crucial component in the cellular machinery, and mutations in the complex can cause devastating neurological defects. The complex is also targeted by viruses – such as SARS-CoV-2 – that manipulate HOPS to reduce its activity. Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al.’s findings could help researchers to develop drugs to maintain or recover the activity of HOPS. However, this will require additional information about its structure and how the complex acts in the biological environment of the cell.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36098503
doi: 10.7554/eLife.80901
pii: 80901
pmc: PMC9592082
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
0
rab GTP-Binding Proteins
EC 3.6.5.2
SNARE Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Shvarev, Schoppe, König et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
DS, JS, CK, AP, NF, SK, LL, DJ, KS, DK, FF, AM, CU No competing interests declared
Références
J Cell Sci. 2019 May 15;132(10):
pubmed: 31092635
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 Aug;23(8):761-3
pubmed: 27428774
Methods. 2016 May 1;100:35-41
pubmed: 27016144
Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):5813-24
pubmed: 1840635
EMBO Mol Med. 2021 May 7;13(5):e13258
pubmed: 33851776
Elife. 2021 May 04;10:
pubmed: 33944780
Biochem J. 2017 Oct 23;474(21):3615-3626
pubmed: 28931724
Annu Rev Biochem. 2021 Jun 20;90:581-603
pubmed: 33823650
Protein Sci. 2018 Jan;27(1):293-315
pubmed: 29067766
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4):
pubmed: 33468652
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Mar 15;28(6):707-711
pubmed: 28292915
Elife. 2017 Jul 18;6:
pubmed: 28718762
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7899):180-186
pubmed: 34929720
Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:523-30
pubmed: 9048379
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 24;8(25):eabo5272
pubmed: 35731863
Nature. 2017 Nov 30;551(7682):634-638
pubmed: 29088698
Dev Cell. 2018 Jun 4;45(5):621-636.e7
pubmed: 29870720
Traffic. 2019 Jul;20(7):479-490
pubmed: 31062920
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009 Jun;65(Pt 6):582-601
pubmed: 19465773
EMBO J. 2008 Aug 6;27(15):2031-42
pubmed: 18650938
Nature. 2011 Aug 24;477(7364):340-3
pubmed: 21866103
Curr Biol. 2020 Nov 16;30(22):4399-4412.e7
pubmed: 32916113
Cell Logist. 2014 May 12;4:e29191
pubmed: 25210650
J Comput Chem. 2004 Oct;25(13):1605-12
pubmed: 15264254
Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Apr 15;22(8):1353-63
pubmed: 21325627
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 7;109(6):1991-6
pubmed: 22308417
Elife. 2020 May 11;9:
pubmed: 32391792
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016 May 09;4:35
pubmed: 27243003
Nat Methods. 2017 Mar;14(3):290-296
pubmed: 28165473
Traffic. 2001 Jul;2(7):476-86
pubmed: 11422941
FEBS Lett. 2015 Sep 14;589(19 Pt A):2487-97
pubmed: 26072291
Brain. 2021 Apr 12;144(3):769-780
pubmed: 33764426
PLoS Genet. 2016 Apr 27;12(4):e1005848
pubmed: 27120463
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Aug 15;27(16):2590-7
pubmed: 27385334
Yeast. 2004 Aug;21(11):947-62
pubmed: 15334558
J Biol Chem. 2018 Jan 12;293(2):731-739
pubmed: 29184002
Elife. 2022 Sep 13;11:
pubmed: 36098503
Science. 2015 Sep 4;349(6252):1111-4
pubmed: 26339030
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Jun 1;74(Pt 6):531-544
pubmed: 29872004
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 5;110(10):3823-8
pubmed: 23417307
Traffic. 2010 Oct;11(10):1334-46
pubmed: 20604902
Trends Biochem Sci. 2021 Feb;46(2):97-112
pubmed: 33012625
Cell. 2009 Dec 11;139(6):1119-29
pubmed: 20005805
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):583-589
pubmed: 34265844
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jan 7;50(D1):D439-D444
pubmed: 34791371
Elife. 2020 Jan 21;9:
pubmed: 31961324
Protein Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):70-82
pubmed: 32881101
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Jan 15;28(2):322-332
pubmed: 27852901
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010 Apr;66(Pt 4):486-501
pubmed: 20383002
Science. 2009 Jan 23;323(5913):474-7
pubmed: 19164740
Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Nov;12(11):3375-85
pubmed: 11694574
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 Aug;23(8):758-60
pubmed: 27428773
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012 Apr;68(Pt 4):352-67
pubmed: 22505256
Dev Cell. 2014 Jul 14;30(1):86-94
pubmed: 25026035
EMBO J. 2021 Oct 1;40(19):e108863
pubmed: 34459017
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1189-91
pubmed: 19151095
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2019 Oct 1;75(Pt 10):861-877
pubmed: 31588918
Nat Cell Biol. 2020 Feb;22(2):213-224
pubmed: 31988382
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010 Feb;66(Pt 2):213-21
pubmed: 20124702
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Aug;17(8):465-79
pubmed: 27301672
J Cell Biol. 2010 Nov 15;191(4):845-59
pubmed: 21079247
Dev Cell. 2014 Jul 14;30(1):95-102
pubmed: 25026036
Neuron. 2017 Aug 2;95(3):591-607.e10
pubmed: 28772123
IUCrJ. 2019 Jun 27;6(Pt 4):526-531
pubmed: 31316797
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 23;10(1):1833
pubmed: 31015428
Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):201-7
pubmed: 23060190
Nature. 2016 Sep 1;537(7618):107-111
pubmed: 27556945
Mol Biol Cell. 2022 May 1;33(5):ar38
pubmed: 35171720
J Biol Chem. 2015 Dec 18;290(51):30280-90
pubmed: 26463206
J Cell Biol. 2020 Feb 3;219(2):
pubmed: 31904797
Elife. 2014 Sep 25;3:e03251
pubmed: 25255215
J Appl Crystallogr. 2007 Aug 1;40(Pt 4):658-674
pubmed: 19461840
Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Nov;8(11):2307-27
pubmed: 9362071
Annu Rev Biophys. 2022 May 9;51:377-408
pubmed: 35167762
Dev Cell. 2021 Feb 22;56(4):427-442.e5
pubmed: 33422265
J Med Genet. 2015 Nov;52(11):749-53
pubmed: 26307567
Elife. 2021 Jan 29;10:
pubmed: 33513092
Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Sep;23(17):3429-37
pubmed: 22787280
Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Jul 15;22(14):2601-11
pubmed: 21613544
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2302:153-178
pubmed: 33877627
Curr Biol. 2022 Jul 11;32(13):2821-2833.e6
pubmed: 35609603
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
pubmed: 15034147
Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Dec 1;32(22):br14
pubmed: 34668759
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 13;110(33):13345-50
pubmed: 23901104
J Biol Chem. 2015 Feb 27;290(9):5405-13
pubmed: 25564619