Accuracy of anatomic 3-dimensionally printed canine humeral models.
Journal
Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
Titre abrégé: Vet Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8113214
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
revised:
19
07
2022
received:
18
03
2022
accepted:
05
09
2022
pubmed:
23
9
2022
medline:
31
12
2022
entrez:
22
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the accuracy of various three-dimensional print (3DP) technologies using morphometric measurements. Experimental. Cadaveric canine humeri and size-matched 3DP models. Fiduciary radiopaque markers were affixed to canine humeri of three different sizes (4, 13, 29 kg) at predetermined anatomical landmarks. 3DP models were created using one of three printers; desktop printers Form 3L and Ultimaker 5S, and industrial printer Objet Connex (n = 5/group/printer). Marker based morphometric dimensions between cadavers and 3DP models were statistically compared using 2-factor repeated measures ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (p < .05). Bone size and printer type both significantly affected 3DP accuracy, with size having the larger effect (p < .0001 and p < .02, respectively). Regardless of printing technology, model size was smaller than native bone in most cases. At the humeral condylar level, the best accuracy was seen in the medium-sized humerus with the Ultimaker printer ([0.09 mm], p < .03). Accuracy was reduced in the proximal humerus in all groups. Desktop printers were overall more accurate than the industrial printer. Although significant differences were identified between models of different sizes, the submillimetric magnitude of these differences is unlikely to be clinically relevant. While preoperative planning using 3DP models is becoming mainstream, accurate representation of the actual bone is critical. This study demonstrates that common desktop printers are suitable for this purpose.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116-126Subventions
Organisme : Michigan State University Endowed Research Funds
ID : Endowed Julia Glasow Fund Purebred Dogs
Informations de copyright
© 2022 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Références
Brown GA, Milner B, Firoozbakhsh K. Application of computer-generated stereolithography and interpositioning template in acetabular fractures: a report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:347-352.
Salmi M, Ituarte IF, Chekurov S, Huotilainen E. Effect of build orientation in 3D printing production for material extrusion, material jetting, binder jetting, sheet object lamination, vat photopolymerisation, and powder bed fusion. Int J Collab Enterp. 2016;5(3-4):218-231.
Upex P, Jouffroy P, Riouallon G. Application of 3D printing for treating fractures of both columns of the acetabulum: benefit of pre-contouring plates on the mirrored healthy pelvis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(3):331-334.
Fujioka T, Nakata K, Nishida H, et al. A novel patient-specific drill guide template for stabilization of thoracolumbar vertebrae of dogs: cadaveric study and clinical cases. Vet Surg. 2019;48(3):336-342.
Petropolis C, Kozan D, Sigurdson L. Accuracy of medical models made by consumer-grade fused deposition modelling printers. Plast Surg. 2015;23(2):91-94.
DiPaola M, Wodajo FM. Building the future of orthopedics: one layer at a time. 3D Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery. Elsevier; 2019 (p. ix).
Groth CH, Kravitz ND, Jones PE, et al. Three-dimensional printing technology. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48(8):475-485.
Ferràs-Tarragó J, Sabalza-Baztán O, Sahuquillo-Arce JM, et al. Security of 3D-printed polylactide acid piece sterilization in the operating room: a sterility test. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;1-6. doi:10.1007/s00068-020-01564-1
Aguado-Maestro I, De Frutos-Serna M, González-Nava A, Merino-De Santos AB, García-Alonso M. Are the common sterilization methods completely effective for our in-house 3D printed biomodels and surgical guides? Injury. 2021;52(6):1341-1345.
Hall DC Jr, Palmer P, Ji HF, Ehrlich GD, Król JE. Bacterial biofilm growth on 3D-printed materials. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:1-13. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.646303
Larguier L, Hespel AM, Jamet N, et al. Accuracy and precision of measurements performed on threedimensional printed pelvises when compared to computed tomography measurements. J Vet Sci. 2019;20(3):1-10. https://synapse.koreamed.org/articles/1125081
Chang PS, Parker TH, Patrick CW, Miller MJ. The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(2):164-170.
Karlin L, Weinstock P, Hedequist D, Prabhu SP. The surgical treatment of spinal deformity in children with myelomeningocele: the role of personalized three-dimensional printed models. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017;26(4):375-382.
Zheng YX, Yu DF, Zhao JG, Wu YL, Zheng B. 3D printout models vs. 3D-rendered images: which is better for preoperative planning? J Surg Educ. 2016;73(3):518-523.
Matsumoto JS, Morris JM, Foley TA, et al. Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at Mayo Clinic. Radiographics. 2015;35(7):1989-2006.
Namba K, Higaki A, Kaneko N, Mashiko T, Nemoto S, Watanabe E. Microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm coiling using the 3-dimensional printing rapid prototyping technology: preliminary result in the first 10 consecutive cases. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(1):178-186.
Giannopoulos AA, Steigner ML, George E, et al. Cardiothoracic applications of 3-dimensional printing. J Thorac Imaging. 2016;31(5):253-272.
Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, et al. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2015;35(7):1965-1988.
Erickson DM, Chance D, Schmitt S, Mathis J. An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57(9):1040-1043.
Liu YF, Xu LW, Zhu HY, Liu SS. Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:63.
Weinstock P, Prabhu SP, Flynn K, Orbach DB, Smith E. Optimizing cerebrovascular surgical and endovascular procedures in children via personalized 3D printing. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16(5):584-589.
Yang M, Li C, Li Y, et al. Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine. 2015;94(8):1-8. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000582. PMID: 25715261; PMCID: PMC4554159.
Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1485-1500.
Fitzwater KL, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OL, et al. Evaluation of the effect of computed tomography scan protocols and freeform fabrication methods on bone biomodel accuracy. Am J Vet Res. 2011;72:1178-1185.
Li F, Liu C, Song X, Huan Y, Gao S, Jiang Z. Production of accurate skeletal models of domestic animals using three dimensional scanning and printing technology. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):73-80.
Anderson JR, Thompson WL, Alkattan AK, et al. Three-dimensional printing of anatomically accurate, patient specific intracranial aneurysm models. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(5):517-520. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011686 Epub 2015 Apr 10.
Lau I, Wong YH, Yeong CH, et al. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low- and high-cost 3D-printed heart models. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(1):107-114. doi:10.21037/qims.2019.01.02
George E, Liacouras P, Rybicki FJ, Mitsouras D. Measuring and establishing the accuracy and reproducibility of 3D printed medical models. Radiographics. 2017;37(5):1424-1450.
Stopp S, Wolff T, Irlinger F, Lueth T. A new method for printer calibration and contour accuracy manufacturing with 3D-print technology. Rapid Prototyp J. 2008;14(3):167-172.
Msallem B, Sharma N, Cao S, Halbeisen FS, Zeilhofer HF, Thieringer FM. Evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed anatomical mandibular models using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ printing technology. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):817.
Mejia S, Stewart N, Miller A, et al. Accuracy of external measurements of 3-dimensional (3D) printed biomodels of the canine radius used in an in-hospital setting. Can J Vet Res. 2019;83(3):181-186.
Cone JA, Martin TM, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OL, Griffith EH. Accuracy and repeatability of long-bone replicas of small animals fabricated by use of low-end and high-end commercial three-dimensional printers. Am J Vet Res. 2017;78(8):900-905.
Marturello DM, Perry KL, Dejardin LM. Clinical application of the small I-Loc nail in 30 feline fractures: a prospective study. Vet Surg. 2021;50(3):588-599.
Reems MR, Beale BS, Hulse DA. Use of a plate-rod construct and principles of biological osteosynthesis for repair of diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 47 cases (1994-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223(3):330-335.
Nascimento Silva D, Gerhardt De Oliveira M, Meurer E, Mi M, Lopes Da Silva JV, Santa-Barbara A. Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(8):443-449.
Marturello DM, Wei F, Déjardin LM. Characterization of the torsional structural properties of feline femurs and surrogate bone models for mechanical testing of orthopedic implants. Vet Surg. 2019;48(2):229-236.
Lansdowne JL, Sinnott MT, Déjardin LM, et al. In vitro mechanical comparison of screwed, bolted, and novel interlocking nail systems to buttress plate fixation in torsion and mediolateral bending. Vet Surg. 2007;36(4):368-377.
Marturello DM, von Pfeil DJF, Déjardin LM. Mechanical comparison of small interlocking nail systems in torsion using a feline bone model surrogate. Vet Surg. 2020;49(2):380-389.
Marturello DM, Von Pfeil DJ, Déjardin LM. Evaluation of a feline bone surrogate and in vitro mechanical comparison of small interlocking nail systems in mediolateral bending. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2021;34:223-233.
Seminati E, Canepa Talamas D, Young M, Twiste M, Dhokia V, Bilzon JL. Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models. PloS One. 2017;12(9):e0184498.
Bardet JF, Hohn RB, Rl R, et al. Fractures of the humerus in dogs and cats: a retrospective study of 130 cases. Vet Surg. 1983;12:73-77.
Lau SC, Keith PP. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty: not as accurate as it would seem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(1):90-95.
Dallalana RJ, McMahon RA, East B, Geraghty L. Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2016;10(2):59-66.
Cabarcas BC, Cvetanovich GL, Gowd AK, Liu JN, Manderle BJ, Verma NN. Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Open Access. 2019;3(3):117-129.
Maini L, Verma T, Sharma A, Sharma A, Mishra A, Jha S. Evaluation of accuracy of virtual surgical planning for patient-specific pre-contoured plate in acetabular fracture fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(4):495-504.
Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi-Kanno N, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med. 2014;10(1):1-8.
Zimmerer RM, Ellis E III, Aniceto GS, et al. A prospective multicenter study to compare the precision of posttraumatic internal orbital reconstruction with standard preformed and individualized orbital implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(9):1485-1497.
Favero CS, English JD, Cozad BE, Wirthlin JO, Short MM, Kasper FK. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152(4):557-565.
Mahesh M. Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):949-962.
Zhu Z, Anwer N, Mathieu L. Geometric deviation modeling with statistical shape analysis in design for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2019;84:496-501.
Ibrahim D, Broilo TL, Heitz C, et al. Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet™ models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37(3):167-173.