Clinical and NGS predictors of response to regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma.
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
DNA Modification Methylases
/ genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ genetics
ErbB Receptors
/ metabolism
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Mitogens
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Phenylurea Compounds
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Pyridines
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ genetics
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 09 2022
28 09 2022
Historique:
received:
04
04
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
entrez:
28
9
2022
pubmed:
29
9
2022
medline:
1
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Predictive factors for response to regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, are scarcely recognized. The objective of this study was to identify molecular predictive factors for response to regorafenib using a clinically available platform. We analyzed a prospective cohort of 30 patients harboring recurrent glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, and treated with regorafenib. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues using a clinically available platform. Moreover, MGMT methylation and EGFRvIII expression analyses were performed. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 30% and median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months, in line with literature data. NGS analysis revealed a mutation in the EGFR pathway in 18% of cases and a mutation in the mitogen-activated protein-kinase (MAPK) pathway in 18% of cases. In the remaining cases, no mutations were detected. Patients carrying MAPK pathway mutation had a poor response to regorafenib treatment, with a significantly shorter PFS and a nonsignificantly shorter OS compared to EGFR-mutated patients (for PFS, 2.5 vs 4.5 months, p = 0.0061; for OS, 7 vs 9 months, p = 0.1076). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MAPK pathway mutations independently predicted a shorter PFS after regorafenib treatment (p = 0.0188). The negative prognostic role of MAPK pathway alteration was reinforced when we combined EGFR-mutated with EGFRvIII-positive cases. Recurrent glioblastoma tumors with an alteration in MAPK pathway could belong to the mesenchymal subtype and respond poorly to regorafenib treatment, while EGFR-altered cases have a better response to regorafenib. We thus provide a molecular selection criterion easy to implement in the clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36171338
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20417-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-20417-y
pmc: PMC9519741
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mitogens
0
Phenylurea Compounds
0
Pyridines
0
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
regorafenib
24T2A1DOYB
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16265Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Neoplasia. 2011 Dec;13(12):1113-21
pubmed: 22241957
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 May 08;5:64
pubmed: 24991467
Oncogene. 2006 May 25;25(22):3206-11
pubmed: 16418724
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):E529-E540
pubmed: 32186345
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2735-44
pubmed: 26124478
Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 15;65(24):11536-44
pubmed: 16357163
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):264-276
pubmed: 32661549
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):110-119
pubmed: 30522967
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4478-4484
pubmed: 32518098
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021 Jan;42(1):108-114
pubmed: 32398685
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77
pubmed: 24120142
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1954-1963
pubmed: 29141164
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 12;11:672500
pubmed: 34322383
Int J Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;129(1):245-55
pubmed: 21170960
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):59-70
pubmed: 30053126
J Cell Physiol. 2015 Jan;230(1):131-9
pubmed: 24911215
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 26;12(5):
pubmed: 35629107
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Jul;87:102029
pubmed: 32408220
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72
pubmed: 20231676
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931