Genome size and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of field-grown and in vitro regenerated Pluchea lanceolata plants.

Asteraceae Genetic homogeneity Histology Organogenesis Photosynthetic pigments Triterpenoids

Journal

Journal of applied genetics
ISSN: 2190-3883
Titre abrégé: J Appl Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9514582

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 27 06 2022
accepted: 16 09 2022
revised: 16 09 2022
pubmed: 30 9 2022
medline: 17 1 2023
entrez: 29 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pluchea lanceolata is a threatened pharmacologically important plant from the family Asteraceae. It is a source of immunologically active compounds; large-scale propagation may offer compounds with medicinal benefits. Traditional propagation method is ineffective as the seeds are not viable; and root sprout propagation is a slow process and produces less numbers of plants. Plant tissue culture technique is an alternative, efficient method for increasing mass propagation and it also facilitate genetic improvement. The present study investigated a three-way regeneration system in P. lanceolata using indirect shoot regeneration (ISR), direct shoot regeneration (DSR), and somatic embryo mediated regeneration (SER). Aseptic leaf and nodal explants were inoculated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium amended with plant growth regulators (PGRs), 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D), 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), and 6-benzyl amino purine (BAP) either singly or in combinations. Compact, yellowish green callus was obtained from leaf explants in 1.0 mg/l BAP (89.10%) added medium; ISR percentage was high, i.e., 69.33% in 2.0 mg/l BAP + 0.5 mg/l NAA enriched MS with 4.02 mean number of shoots per callus mass. Highest DSR frequency (67.15%) with an average of 5.62 shoot numbers per explant was noted in 0.5 mg/l BAP added MS medium. Somatic embryos were produced in 1.0 mg/l NAA fortified medium with 4.1 mean numbers of somatic embryos per culture. On BAP (1.0 mg/l) + 0.5 mg/l gibberellic acid (GA

Identifiants

pubmed: 36175751
doi: 10.1007/s13353-022-00727-7
pii: 10.1007/s13353-022-00727-7
pmc: PMC9522435
doi:

Substances chimiques

lupeol O268W13H3O

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-21

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Institute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences.

Références

Fitoterapia. 2012 Dec;83(8):1371-85
pubmed: 22877846
Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022;150(1):129-140
pubmed: 35250130
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):99-110
pubmed: 15596459
3 Biotech. 2013 Dec;3(6):471-479
pubmed: 28324418
Protoplasma. 2014 May;251(3):703-9
pubmed: 23990110
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 22;7:301
pubmed: 27047498
J Chromatogr A. 2009 Sep 18;1216(38):6662-70
pubmed: 19695573
Planta. 2018 Jul;248(1):1-18
pubmed: 29736623
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2020 Jul 13;18(1):31
pubmed: 32661633
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Sep 1;170(13):1202-11
pubmed: 23790533
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Jun 17;2013:680425
pubmed: 23853539
Phytother Res. 2021 Mar;35(3):1230-1236
pubmed: 33034398
Cytometry A. 2003 Feb;51(2):127-8; author reply 129
pubmed: 12541287
J Appl Genet. 2022 May;63(2):199-211
pubmed: 34859368
Plants (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;10(3):
pubmed: 33668870
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Apr;1849(4):385-402
pubmed: 25038583
J Med Chem. 2017 Apr 27;60(8):3221-3240
pubmed: 28135088
Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6
pubmed: 6727660
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Jun 12;16(6):13561-78
pubmed: 26075872
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013 Jan;19(1):117-25
pubmed: 24381443
J Appl Genet. 2020 Feb;61(1):25-35
pubmed: 31919659
3 Biotech. 2019 Nov;9(11):414
pubmed: 31696019
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 26;10:536
pubmed: 31134106
Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Jan;7(1):121-31
pubmed: 22301978
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2527:11-27
pubmed: 35951180
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jul 27;8:1298
pubmed: 28798758
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):255-60
pubmed: 15596473
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 07;10:77
pubmed: 30792725
Mol Biol Rep. 2021 Jan;48(1):513-526
pubmed: 33442831
Braz J Biol. 2016 Feb;76(1):218-27
pubmed: 26909639
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):63-8
pubmed: 23961221
Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1-15
pubmed: 16654194

Auteurs

Jyoti Mamgain (J)

Cellular Differentiation and Molecular Genetics Section, Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.

A Mujib (A)

Cellular Differentiation and Molecular Genetics Section, Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. amujib3@yahoo.co.in.

Rukaya Syeed (R)

Cellular Differentiation and Molecular Genetics Section, Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.

Bushra Ejaz (B)

Cellular Differentiation and Molecular Genetics Section, Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.

Moien Qadir Malik (MQ)

Cellular Differentiation and Molecular Genetics Section, Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.

Yashika Bansal (Y)

Cellular Differentiation and Molecular Genetics Section, Department of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.

Articles similaires

Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis

Regeneration of a Discoid Meniscus: A Case Report.

Myung-Jin Cha, John P Avendano, Aoife MacMahon et al.
1.00
Humans Female Child, Preschool Menisci, Tibial Arthroscopy
Periodontal Ligament Humans Regeneration Stem Cells Animals
Klebsiella pneumoniae Volatile Organic Compounds Metabolomics Ion Mobility Spectrometry Bacterial Proteins

Classifications MeSH