Hot-Carrier Transfer across a Nanoparticle-Molecule Junction: The Importance of Orbital Hybridization and Level Alignment.
Adsorption
Hot-carrier
Nanoparticles
Plasmonic catalysis
TDDFT
Journal
Nano letters
ISSN: 1530-6992
Titre abrégé: Nano Lett
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101088070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 11 2022
09 11 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
10
2022
medline:
11
11
2022
entrez:
6
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While direct hot-carrier transfer can increase photocatalytic activity, it is difficult to discern experimentally and competes with several other mechanisms. To shed light on these aspects, here, we model from first-principles hot-carrier generation across the interface between plasmonic nanoparticles and a CO molecule. The hot-electron transfer probability depends nonmonotonically on the nanoparticle-molecule distance and can be effective at long distances, even before a strong chemical bond can form; hot-hole transfer on the other hand is limited to shorter distances. These observations can be explained by the energetic alignment between molecular and nanoparticle states as well as the excitation frequency. The hybridization of the molecular orbitals is the key predictor for hot-carrier transfer in these systems, emphasizing the necessity of ground state hybridization for accurate predictions. Finally, we show a nontrivial dependence of the hot-carrier distribution on the excitation energy, which could be exploited when optimizing photocatalytic systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36200744
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02327
pmc: PMC9650767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8786-8792Références
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8
pubmed: 8744570
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Dec 08;11(12):
pubmed: 34947678
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1996 Oct 15;54(15):10862-10868
pubmed: 9984884
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1993 Jan 1;47(1):558-561
pubmed: 10004490
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Science. 2018 Oct 5;362(6410):69-72
pubmed: 30287657
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1996 Oct 15;54(16):11169-11186
pubmed: 9984901
Nano Lett. 2018 Apr 11;18(4):2545-2550
pubmed: 29522350
Nat Nanotechnol. 2015 Jan;10(1):25-34
pubmed: 25559968
ACS Nano. 2020 Aug 25;14(8):9963-9971
pubmed: 32687311
Faraday Discuss. 2019 May 1;214:35-58
pubmed: 30806397
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Oct 10;13(10):4779-4790
pubmed: 28862851
Chem Sci. 2020 Aug 13;11(33):9022-9023
pubmed: 34125118
J Phys Condens Matter. 2017 Jul 12;29(27):273002
pubmed: 28323250
J Chem Phys. 2007 May 21;126(19):194702
pubmed: 17523823
Phys Rev A. 1995 Mar;51(3):1944-1954
pubmed: 9911804
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1996 Aug 15;54(7):4484-4487
pubmed: 9986402
ACS Nano. 2019 Mar 26;13(3):3188-3195
pubmed: 30768238
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 16;5:5788
pubmed: 25511713
Nano Lett. 2020 Apr 8;20(4):2348-2358
pubmed: 32134672
Nano Lett. 2021 Jan 27;21(2):1083-1089
pubmed: 33416331
Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 02;6:7044
pubmed: 26033445
Science. 2019 May 3;364(6439):
pubmed: 31048461
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362
pubmed: 32939066
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20):
pubmed: 33972426
Chem Sci. 2020 Apr 21;11(19):5017-5027
pubmed: 34122958
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Aug 28;103(9):096102
pubmed: 19792809
Nat Chem. 2011 Jun;3(6):467-72
pubmed: 21602862
J Phys Condens Matter. 2010 Jun 30;22(25):253202
pubmed: 21393795
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1994 Dec 15;50(24):17953-17979
pubmed: 9976227
Faraday Discuss. 2019 May 1;214:189-197
pubmed: 30855061
ACS Nano. 2019 Dec 24;13(12):13658-13667
pubmed: 31393703
Nat Mater. 2019 May;18(5):489-495
pubmed: 30936481
Science. 2019 May 3;364(6439):
pubmed: 31048463
F1000Res. 2021 Jan 18;10:33
pubmed: 34035898
Nat Mater. 2015 Jun;14(6):567-76
pubmed: 25990912
J Phys Condens Matter. 2010 Jan 20;22(2):022201
pubmed: 21386245