Quinone binding site in a type VI sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase.
Disulfide reductase
Quinone binding site
Quinone reduction
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR)
Sulfur metabolism
Journal
Applied microbiology and biotechnology
ISSN: 1432-0614
Titre abrégé: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8406612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
01
07
2022
accepted:
21
09
2022
revised:
16
09
2022
pubmed:
12
10
2022
medline:
19
11
2022
entrez:
11
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Monotopic membrane-bound flavoproteins, sulfide:quinone oxidoreductases (SQRs), have a variety of physiological functions, including sulfide detoxification. SQR enzymes are classified into six groups. SQRs use the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor to transfer electrons from sulfide to quinone. A type VI SQR of the photosynthetic purple sulfur bacterium, Thiocapsa roseopersicina (TrSqrF), has been previously characterized, and the mechanism of sulfide oxidation has been proposed. This paper reports the characterization of quinone binding site (QBS) of TrSqrF composed of conserved aromatic and apolar amino acids. Val331, Ile333, and Phe366 were identified near the benzoquinone ring of enzyme-bound decylubiquinone (dUQ) using the TrSqrF homology model. In silico analysis revealed that Val331 and Ile333 alternately connected with the quinone head group via hydrogen bonds, and Phe366 and Trp369 bound the quinones via hydrophobic interactions. TrSqrF variants containing alanine (V331A, I333A, F366A) and aromatic amino acid (V331F, I333F, F366Y), as well as a C-terminal α-helix deletion (CTD) mutant were generated. These amino acids are critical for quinone binding and, thus, catalysis. Spectroscopic analyses proved that all mutants contained FAD. I333F replacement resulted in the lack of the charge transfer complex. In summary, the interactions described above maintain the quinone molecule's head in an optimal position for direct electron transfer from FAD. Surprisingly, the CTD mutant retained a relatively high level of specific activity while remaining membrane-anchored. This is a unique study because it focuses on the QBS and the oxidative stage of a type VI sulfide-dependent quinone reduction. KEY POINTS: • V331, I333, F366, and W369 were shown to interact with decylubiquinone in T. roseopersicina SqrF • These amino acids are involved in proper positioning of quinones next to FAD • I333 is essential in formation of a charge transfer complex from FAD to quinone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36219222
doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12202-8
pii: 10.1007/s00253-022-12202-8
pmc: PMC9666304
doi:
Substances chimiques
quinone
3T006GV98U
Flavin-Adenine Dinucleotide
146-14-5
Quinone Reductases
EC 1.6.99.-
Sulfides
0
Benzoquinones
0
Amino Acids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7505-7517Subventions
Organisme : Magyarország Kormánya
ID : EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00010
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Bacteriol. 2009 Feb;191(3):1026-34
pubmed: 19028893
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2021 Feb 1;1862(2):148337
pubmed: 33202220
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2017 Oct;1858(10):823-832
pubmed: 28801048
Proteomics. 2005 Nov;5(17):4338-46
pubmed: 16220535
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2020 Feb 1;1861(2):148132
pubmed: 31816290
Methods Enzymol. 1978;53:579-91
pubmed: 101738
Proteins. 2010 Apr;78(5):1073-83
pubmed: 20077566
Structure. 2019 May 7;27(5):794-805.e4
pubmed: 30905673
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;102(12):5133-5147
pubmed: 29680900
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Mar;1827(3):266-75
pubmed: 23103448
Biochemistry. 2016 Nov 29;55(47):6524-6534
pubmed: 27806570
Mikrobiologiia. 1974 Mar;43(2):326-32
pubmed: 4275197
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Oct;1837(10):1691-8
pubmed: 25111750
Biochem Cell Biol. 2016 Apr;94(2):159-66
pubmed: 26914540
J Mol Biol. 2010 Apr 30;398(2):292-305
pubmed: 20303979
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Jan 2;313(1):22-7
pubmed: 14672692
J Phys Chem B. 2011 Aug 4;115(30):9431-8
pubmed: 21714551
Redox Biol. 2018 Jun;16:209-214
pubmed: 29524843
J Biol Chem. 2015 Oct 9;290(41):25072-80
pubmed: 26318450
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Sep;20(9):1564-74
pubmed: 12832624
Electrophoresis. 2004 May;25(9):1327-33
pubmed: 15174055
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106(24):9625-30
pubmed: 19487671
J Struct Biol. 2012 Jun;178(3):319-28
pubmed: 22542586
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016 Jun;363(12):
pubmed: 27190141
Redox Biol. 2013 May 23;1:313-8
pubmed: 24024166
Biochemistry. 2002 Oct 1;41(39):11552-65
pubmed: 12269799
FEBS Lett. 1982 Sep 6;146(1):101-5
pubmed: 6291984
Chem Asian J. 2013 Nov;8(11):2708-13
pubmed: 23907989
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018 Sep;1859(9):742-753
pubmed: 29684324
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2476-83
pubmed: 11375153
Biochemistry. 2009 Jun 23;48(24):5613-22
pubmed: 19438211
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Nov;1798(11):2114-23
pubmed: 20691146
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jul;3(7):e121
pubmed: 17658942
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997 Aug 28;237(3):527-31
pubmed: 9299397
J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75
pubmed: 14907713