Thermodynamic Properties of Crystalline Cellulose Allomorphs Studied with Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Methods.

cellulose density functional theory phonon properties quantum chemical calculations quasiharmonic approximation thermodynamics

Journal

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 22 08 2022
revised: 18 09 2022
accepted: 19 09 2022
entrez: 14 10 2022
pubmed: 15 10 2022
medline: 18 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The phonon properties and thermodynamics of four crystalline cellulose allomorphs, Iα, Iβ, II, and III1, have been investigated using dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT). In line with experimental findings, the free energy differences between the studied cellulose allomorphs are small, less than 1 kJ/mol per atom. The calculated specific heat at constant volume (Cv) has been compared with the available experimental data in the temperature range 10-300 K. Quasiharmonic approximation has been employed to study thermodynamics and specific heat at constant pressure (Cp). For the studied temperature range of 10-400 K, the specific heat of all cellulose allomorphs shows very similar behavior. The calculated and experimental specific heat agree well at low temperatures below 100 K, but the deviation between theory and experiment increases with temperature. This may be due to increasing phonon anharmonicity as the temperature increases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36234777
pii: molecules27196240
doi: 10.3390/molecules27196240
pmc: PMC9570836
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cellulose 9004-34-6

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 318890
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 318891

Références

J Chem Phys. 2015 Jan 28;142(4):044114
pubmed: 25637976
Chem Rev. 2010 Jun 9;110(6):3479-500
pubmed: 20201500
J Chem Phys. 2015 May 28;142(20):204502
pubmed: 26026453
J Chem Phys. 2010 Apr 21;132(15):154104
pubmed: 20423165
J Comput Chem. 2011 May;32(7):1456-65
pubmed: 21370243
J Chem Phys. 2014 Sep 28;141(12):124115
pubmed: 25273420
Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Sep 1;243:116440
pubmed: 32532390
J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Nov 26;125(47):14300-6
pubmed: 14624578
Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Oct 28;77(18):3865-3868
pubmed: 10062328
J Comput Chem. 2006 Nov 30;27(15):1787-99
pubmed: 16955487
Science. 1984 Jan 20;223(4633):283-5
pubmed: 17801599
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2005 Sep 21;7(18):3297-305
pubmed: 16240044
J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Aug 7;124(31):9074-82
pubmed: 12149011
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 May 7;17(17):11670-7
pubmed: 25864537
Biomacromolecules. 2001 Summer;2(2):410-6
pubmed: 11749200

Auteurs

Divya Srivastava (D)

Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.

Jouni Ahopelto (J)

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland.

Antti J Karttunen (AJ)

Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.

Articles similaires

Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 Ligands Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protein Binding Thermodynamics
Anthraquinones Kinetics Water Purification Adsorption Thermodynamics
Crystallography, X-Ray DNA Protein Binding HMGA Proteins AT-Hook Motifs

Comparative assessment of physics-based in silico methods to calculate relative solubilities.

Adiran Garaizar Suarez, Andreas H Göller, Michael E Beck et al.
1.00
Solvents Solubility Quantum Theory Molecular Dynamics Simulation Thermodynamics

Classifications MeSH